Message ID | 20200206205301.27367-1-martin.agren@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | diff-options.txt: avoid "regex" overload in example | expand |
Hi Martin, On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 09:53:01PM +0100, Martin Ågren wrote: > When we exemplify the difference between `-G` and `-S` (using > `--pickaxe-regex`), we do so using an example diff and git-diff > invocation involving "regexec", "regexp", "regmatch", ... > > The example is correct, but we can make it easier to untangle by > avoiding writing "regex.*" unless it's really needed to make our point. > > Use some made-up, non-regexy words instead. This is a good idea, and I think that it removes additional, unnecessary confusion from the documentation here. > Reported-by: Adam Dinwoodie <adam@dinwoodie.org> > Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> > --- > Documentation/diff-options.txt | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/diff-options.txt b/Documentation/diff-options.txt > index 09faee3b44..bb31f0c42b 100644 > --- a/Documentation/diff-options.txt > +++ b/Documentation/diff-options.txt > @@ -567,13 +567,13 @@ To illustrate the difference between `-S<regex> --pickaxe-regex` and > file: > + > ---- > -+ return !regexec(regexp, two->ptr, 1, ®match, 0); > ++ return frotz(nitfol, two->ptr, 1, 0); > ... > -- hit = !regexec(regexp, mf2.ptr, 1, ®match, 0); > +- hit = frotz(nitfol, mf2.ptr, 1, 0); > ---- > + > -While `git log -G"regexec\(regexp"` will show this commit, `git log > --S"regexec\(regexp" --pickaxe-regex` will not (because the number of > +While `git log -G"frotz\(nitfol"` will show this commit, `git log > +-S"frotz\(nitfol" --pickaxe-regex` will not (because the number of > occurrences of that string did not change). > + > Unless `--text` is supplied patches of binary files without a textconv > -- > 2.25.0 Thanks for doing it. Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Thanks, Taylor
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes: > This is a good idea, and I think that it removes additional, unnecessary > confusion from the documentation here. > > Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Thanks, both.
diff --git a/Documentation/diff-options.txt b/Documentation/diff-options.txt index 09faee3b44..bb31f0c42b 100644 --- a/Documentation/diff-options.txt +++ b/Documentation/diff-options.txt @@ -567,13 +567,13 @@ To illustrate the difference between `-S<regex> --pickaxe-regex` and file: + ---- -+ return !regexec(regexp, two->ptr, 1, ®match, 0); ++ return frotz(nitfol, two->ptr, 1, 0); ... -- hit = !regexec(regexp, mf2.ptr, 1, ®match, 0); +- hit = frotz(nitfol, mf2.ptr, 1, 0); ---- + -While `git log -G"regexec\(regexp"` will show this commit, `git log --S"regexec\(regexp" --pickaxe-regex` will not (because the number of +While `git log -G"frotz\(nitfol"` will show this commit, `git log +-S"frotz\(nitfol" --pickaxe-regex` will not (because the number of occurrences of that string did not change). + Unless `--text` is supplied patches of binary files without a textconv
When we exemplify the difference between `-G` and `-S` (using `--pickaxe-regex`), we do so using an example diff and git-diff invocation involving "regexec", "regexp", "regmatch", ... The example is correct, but we can make it easier to untangle by avoiding writing "regex.*" unless it's really needed to make our point. Use some made-up, non-regexy words instead. Reported-by: Adam Dinwoodie <adam@dinwoodie.org> Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> --- Documentation/diff-options.txt | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)