| Message ID | 1313075212-8366-5-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:06:41PM +0200, jean.pihet@newoldbits.com wrote: > From: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> > > In preparation for the per-device constratins support, re-organize > the data strctures: > - add a struct pm_qos_constraints which contains the constraints > related data > - update struct pm_qos_object contents to the PM QoS internal object > data. Add a pointer to struct pm_qos_constraints > - update the internal code to use the new data structs. > > Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> > --- > include/linux/pm_qos.h | 19 ++++++++++ > kernel/power/qos.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- > 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/pm_qos.h b/include/linux/pm_qos.h > index 6b0968f..9772311 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pm_qos.h > +++ b/include/linux/pm_qos.h > @@ -25,6 +25,25 @@ struct pm_qos_request { > int pm_qos_class; > }; > > +enum pm_qos_type { > + PM_QOS_UNITIALIZED, what is this for? > + PM_QOS_MAX, /* return the largest value */ > + PM_QOS_MIN /* return the smallest value */ > +}; > + > +/* > + * Note: The lockless read path depends on the CPU accessing > + * target_value atomically. Atomic access is only guaranteed on all CPU > + * types linux supports for 32 bit quantites > + */ > +struct pm_qos_constraints { > + struct plist_head list; > + s32 target_value; /* Do not change to 64 bit */ > + s32 default_value; > + enum pm_qos_type type; > + struct blocking_notifier_head *notifiers; > +}; > + > #ifdef CONFIG_PM > void pm_qos_add_request(struct pm_qos_request *req, int pm_qos_class, > s32 value); > diff --git a/kernel/power/qos.c b/kernel/power/qos.c > index fa9a090..66e8d6f 100644 > --- a/kernel/power/qos.c > +++ b/kernel/power/qos.c > @@ -49,62 +49,54 @@ > * or pm_qos_object list and pm_qos_objects need to happen with pm_qos_lock > * held, taken with _irqsave. One lock to rule them all > */ > -enum pm_qos_type { > - PM_QOS_MAX, /* return the largest value */ > - PM_QOS_MIN /* return the smallest value */ > -}; > - > -/* > - * Note: The lockless read path depends on the CPU accessing > - * target_value atomically. Atomic access is only guaranteed on all CPU > - * types linux supports for 32 bit quantites > - */ > struct pm_qos_object { > - struct plist_head constraints; > - struct blocking_notifier_head *notifiers; > + struct pm_qos_constraints *constraints; > struct miscdevice pm_qos_power_miscdev; > char *name; > - s32 target_value; /* Do not change to 64 bit */ > - s32 default_value; > - enum pm_qos_type type; > }; > > static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pm_qos_lock); > > static struct pm_qos_object null_pm_qos; > + > static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(cpu_dma_lat_notifier); > -static struct pm_qos_object cpu_dma_pm_qos = { > - .constraints = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(cpu_dma_pm_qos.constraints, pm_qos_lock), > - .notifiers = &cpu_dma_lat_notifier, > - .name = "cpu_dma_latency", > +static struct pm_qos_constraints cpu_dma_constraints = { > + .list = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(cpu_dma_constraints.list, pm_qos_lock), > .target_value = PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, > .default_value = PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, > .type = PM_QOS_MIN, > + .notifiers = &cpu_dma_lat_notifier, > +}; > +static struct pm_qos_object cpu_dma_pm_qos = { > + .constraints = &cpu_dma_constraints, > + .name = "cpu_dma_latency", > }; > > static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(network_lat_notifier); > -static struct pm_qos_object network_lat_pm_qos = { > - .constraints = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_lat_pm_qos.constraints, > - pm_qos_lock), > - .notifiers = &network_lat_notifier, > - .name = "network_latency", > +static struct pm_qos_constraints network_lat_constraints = { > + .list = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_lat_constraints.list, pm_qos_lock), > .target_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, > .default_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, > - .type = PM_QOS_MIN > + .type = PM_QOS_MIN, > + .notifiers = &network_lat_notifier, > +}; > +static struct pm_qos_object network_lat_pm_qos = { > + .constraints = &network_lat_constraints, > + .name = "network_latency", > }; > - > > static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(network_throughput_notifier); > -static struct pm_qos_object network_throughput_pm_qos = { > - .constraints = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_throughput_pm_qos.constraints, > - pm_qos_lock), > - .notifiers = &network_throughput_notifier, > - .name = "network_throughput", > +static struct pm_qos_constraints network_tput_constraints = { > + .list = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_tput_constraints.list, pm_qos_lock), > .target_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT_DEFAULT_VALUE, > .default_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT_DEFAULT_VALUE, > .type = PM_QOS_MAX, > + .notifiers = &network_throughput_notifier, > +}; > +static struct pm_qos_object network_throughput_pm_qos = { > + .constraints = &network_tput_constraints, > + .name = "network_throughput", > }; > - > > static struct pm_qos_object *pm_qos_array[] = { > &null_pm_qos, > @@ -131,15 +123,15 @@ static const struct file_operations pm_qos_power_fops = { > /* unlocked internal variant */ > static inline int pm_qos_get_value(struct pm_qos_object *o) > { > - if (plist_head_empty(&o->constraints)) > - return o->default_value; > + if (plist_head_empty(&o->constraints->list)) > + return o->constraints->default_value; > > - switch (o->type) { > + switch (o->constraints->type) { > case PM_QOS_MIN: > - return plist_first(&o->constraints)->prio; > + return plist_first(&o->constraints->list)->prio; > > case PM_QOS_MAX: > - return plist_last(&o->constraints)->prio; > + return plist_last(&o->constraints->list)->prio; > > default: > /* runtime check for not using enum */ > @@ -149,12 +141,12 @@ static inline int pm_qos_get_value(struct pm_qos_object *o) > > static inline s32 pm_qos_read_value(struct pm_qos_object *o) > { > - return o->target_value; > + return o->constraints->target_value; > } > > static inline void pm_qos_set_value(struct pm_qos_object *o, s32 value) > { > - o->target_value = value; > + o->constraints->target_value = value; > } > > static void update_target(struct pm_qos_object *o, struct plist_node *node, > @@ -172,20 +164,20 @@ static void update_target(struct pm_qos_object *o, struct plist_node *node, > * with new value and add, then see if the extremal > * changed > */ > - plist_del(node, &o->constraints); > + plist_del(node, &o->constraints->list); > plist_node_init(node, value); > - plist_add(node, &o->constraints); > + plist_add(node, &o->constraints->list); > } else if (del) { > - plist_del(node, &o->constraints); > + plist_del(node, &o->constraints->list); > } else { > - plist_add(node, &o->constraints); > + plist_add(node, &o->constraints->list); > } > curr_value = pm_qos_get_value(o); > pm_qos_set_value(o, curr_value); > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm_qos_lock, flags); > > if (prev_value != curr_value) > - blocking_notifier_call_chain(o->notifiers, > + blocking_notifier_call_chain(o->constraints->notifiers, > (unsigned long)curr_value, > NULL); > } > @@ -232,7 +224,7 @@ void pm_qos_add_request(struct pm_qos_request *req, > return; > } > if (value == PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE) > - new_value = o->default_value; > + new_value = o->constraints->default_value; > else > new_value = value; > plist_node_init(&req->node, new_value); > @@ -268,7 +260,7 @@ void pm_qos_update_request(struct pm_qos_request *req, > o = pm_qos_array[req->pm_qos_class]; > > if (new_value == PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE) > - temp = o->default_value; > + temp = o->constraints->default_value; > else > temp = new_value; > > @@ -317,7 +309,8 @@ int pm_qos_add_notifier(int pm_qos_class, struct notifier_block *notifier) > int retval; > > retval = blocking_notifier_chain_register( > - pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->notifiers, notifier); > + pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->constraints->notifiers, > + notifier); > > return retval; > } > @@ -336,7 +329,8 @@ int pm_qos_remove_notifier(int pm_qos_class, struct notifier_block *notifier) > int retval; > > retval = blocking_notifier_chain_unregister( > - pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->notifiers, notifier); > + pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->constraints->notifiers, > + notifier); > > return retval; > } > -- > 1.7.2.5 > looks ok but I'm wondering what the uninititalized qos type is for. --mark -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Saturday, August 13, 2011, mark gross wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:06:41PM +0200, jean.pihet@newoldbits.com wrote: > > From: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> > > > > In preparation for the per-device constratins support, re-organize > > the data strctures: > > - add a struct pm_qos_constraints which contains the constraints > > related data > > - update struct pm_qos_object contents to the PM QoS internal object > > data. Add a pointer to struct pm_qos_constraints > > - update the internal code to use the new data structs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> > > --- > > include/linux/pm_qos.h | 19 ++++++++++ > > kernel/power/qos.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- > > 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/pm_qos.h b/include/linux/pm_qos.h > > index 6b0968f..9772311 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/pm_qos.h > > +++ b/include/linux/pm_qos.h > > @@ -25,6 +25,25 @@ struct pm_qos_request { > > int pm_qos_class; > > }; > > > > +enum pm_qos_type { > > + PM_QOS_UNITIALIZED, > what is this for? I seem to remember discussing that previously, but I can't recall what it's for. Jean? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Rafael, Mark, On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > On Saturday, August 13, 2011, mark gross wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:06:41PM +0200, jean.pihet@newoldbits.com wrote: >> > From: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> >> > >> > In preparation for the per-device constratins support, re-organize >> > the data strctures: >> > - add a struct pm_qos_constraints which contains the constraints >> > related data >> > - update struct pm_qos_object contents to the PM QoS internal object >> > data. Add a pointer to struct pm_qos_constraints >> > - update the internal code to use the new data structs. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> >> > --- >> > include/linux/pm_qos.h | 19 ++++++++++ >> > kernel/power/qos.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- >> > 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/include/linux/pm_qos.h b/include/linux/pm_qos.h >> > index 6b0968f..9772311 100644 >> > --- a/include/linux/pm_qos.h >> > +++ b/include/linux/pm_qos.h >> > @@ -25,6 +25,25 @@ struct pm_qos_request { >> > int pm_qos_class; >> > }; >> > >> > +enum pm_qos_type { >> > + PM_QOS_UNITIALIZED, >> what is this for? > > I seem to remember discussing that previously, but I can't recall what > it's for. Jean? > Sorry it is a left over from the previous version, it has been used to detect non initialized data structs. It is still used to detect an error in pm_qos_get_value and so by its callers pm_qos_update_target and pm_qos_power_read. I have to admit the usefulness is quite limited. Is the removal of PM_QOS_UNITIALIZED needed? I would say no. Regards, Jean -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Sunday, August 14, 2011, Jean Pihet wrote: > Rafael, Mark, > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > On Saturday, August 13, 2011, mark gross wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:06:41PM +0200, jean.pihet@newoldbits.com wrote: > >> > From: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> > >> > > >> > In preparation for the per-device constratins support, re-organize > >> > the data strctures: > >> > - add a struct pm_qos_constraints which contains the constraints > >> > related data > >> > - update struct pm_qos_object contents to the PM QoS internal object > >> > data. Add a pointer to struct pm_qos_constraints > >> > - update the internal code to use the new data structs. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> > >> > --- > >> > include/linux/pm_qos.h | 19 ++++++++++ > >> > kernel/power/qos.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- > >> > 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) > >> > > >> > diff --git a/include/linux/pm_qos.h b/include/linux/pm_qos.h > >> > index 6b0968f..9772311 100644 > >> > --- a/include/linux/pm_qos.h > >> > +++ b/include/linux/pm_qos.h > >> > @@ -25,6 +25,25 @@ struct pm_qos_request { > >> > int pm_qos_class; > >> > }; > >> > > >> > +enum pm_qos_type { > >> > + PM_QOS_UNITIALIZED, > >> what is this for? > > > > I seem to remember discussing that previously, but I can't recall what > > it's for. Jean? > > > > Sorry it is a left over from the previous version, it has been used to > detect non initialized data structs. > It is still used to detect an error in pm_qos_get_value and so by its > callers pm_qos_update_target and pm_qos_power_read. I have to admit > the usefulness is quite limited. > > Is the removal of PM_QOS_UNITIALIZED needed? I would say no. I agree. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/include/linux/pm_qos.h b/include/linux/pm_qos.h index 6b0968f..9772311 100644 --- a/include/linux/pm_qos.h +++ b/include/linux/pm_qos.h @@ -25,6 +25,25 @@ struct pm_qos_request { int pm_qos_class; }; +enum pm_qos_type { + PM_QOS_UNITIALIZED, + PM_QOS_MAX, /* return the largest value */ + PM_QOS_MIN /* return the smallest value */ +}; + +/* + * Note: The lockless read path depends on the CPU accessing + * target_value atomically. Atomic access is only guaranteed on all CPU + * types linux supports for 32 bit quantites + */ +struct pm_qos_constraints { + struct plist_head list; + s32 target_value; /* Do not change to 64 bit */ + s32 default_value; + enum pm_qos_type type; + struct blocking_notifier_head *notifiers; +}; + #ifdef CONFIG_PM void pm_qos_add_request(struct pm_qos_request *req, int pm_qos_class, s32 value); diff --git a/kernel/power/qos.c b/kernel/power/qos.c index fa9a090..66e8d6f 100644 --- a/kernel/power/qos.c +++ b/kernel/power/qos.c @@ -49,62 +49,54 @@ * or pm_qos_object list and pm_qos_objects need to happen with pm_qos_lock * held, taken with _irqsave. One lock to rule them all */ -enum pm_qos_type { - PM_QOS_MAX, /* return the largest value */ - PM_QOS_MIN /* return the smallest value */ -}; - -/* - * Note: The lockless read path depends on the CPU accessing - * target_value atomically. Atomic access is only guaranteed on all CPU - * types linux supports for 32 bit quantites - */ struct pm_qos_object { - struct plist_head constraints; - struct blocking_notifier_head *notifiers; + struct pm_qos_constraints *constraints; struct miscdevice pm_qos_power_miscdev; char *name; - s32 target_value; /* Do not change to 64 bit */ - s32 default_value; - enum pm_qos_type type; }; static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pm_qos_lock); static struct pm_qos_object null_pm_qos; + static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(cpu_dma_lat_notifier); -static struct pm_qos_object cpu_dma_pm_qos = { - .constraints = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(cpu_dma_pm_qos.constraints, pm_qos_lock), - .notifiers = &cpu_dma_lat_notifier, - .name = "cpu_dma_latency", +static struct pm_qos_constraints cpu_dma_constraints = { + .list = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(cpu_dma_constraints.list, pm_qos_lock), .target_value = PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, .default_value = PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, .type = PM_QOS_MIN, + .notifiers = &cpu_dma_lat_notifier, +}; +static struct pm_qos_object cpu_dma_pm_qos = { + .constraints = &cpu_dma_constraints, + .name = "cpu_dma_latency", }; static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(network_lat_notifier); -static struct pm_qos_object network_lat_pm_qos = { - .constraints = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_lat_pm_qos.constraints, - pm_qos_lock), - .notifiers = &network_lat_notifier, - .name = "network_latency", +static struct pm_qos_constraints network_lat_constraints = { + .list = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_lat_constraints.list, pm_qos_lock), .target_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, .default_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE, - .type = PM_QOS_MIN + .type = PM_QOS_MIN, + .notifiers = &network_lat_notifier, +}; +static struct pm_qos_object network_lat_pm_qos = { + .constraints = &network_lat_constraints, + .name = "network_latency", }; - static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(network_throughput_notifier); -static struct pm_qos_object network_throughput_pm_qos = { - .constraints = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_throughput_pm_qos.constraints, - pm_qos_lock), - .notifiers = &network_throughput_notifier, - .name = "network_throughput", +static struct pm_qos_constraints network_tput_constraints = { + .list = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_tput_constraints.list, pm_qos_lock), .target_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT_DEFAULT_VALUE, .default_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT_DEFAULT_VALUE, .type = PM_QOS_MAX, + .notifiers = &network_throughput_notifier, +}; +static struct pm_qos_object network_throughput_pm_qos = { + .constraints = &network_tput_constraints, + .name = "network_throughput", }; - static struct pm_qos_object *pm_qos_array[] = { &null_pm_qos, @@ -131,15 +123,15 @@ static const struct file_operations pm_qos_power_fops = { /* unlocked internal variant */ static inline int pm_qos_get_value(struct pm_qos_object *o) { - if (plist_head_empty(&o->constraints)) - return o->default_value; + if (plist_head_empty(&o->constraints->list)) + return o->constraints->default_value; - switch (o->type) { + switch (o->constraints->type) { case PM_QOS_MIN: - return plist_first(&o->constraints)->prio; + return plist_first(&o->constraints->list)->prio; case PM_QOS_MAX: - return plist_last(&o->constraints)->prio; + return plist_last(&o->constraints->list)->prio; default: /* runtime check for not using enum */ @@ -149,12 +141,12 @@ static inline int pm_qos_get_value(struct pm_qos_object *o) static inline s32 pm_qos_read_value(struct pm_qos_object *o) { - return o->target_value; + return o->constraints->target_value; } static inline void pm_qos_set_value(struct pm_qos_object *o, s32 value) { - o->target_value = value; + o->constraints->target_value = value; } static void update_target(struct pm_qos_object *o, struct plist_node *node, @@ -172,20 +164,20 @@ static void update_target(struct pm_qos_object *o, struct plist_node *node, * with new value and add, then see if the extremal * changed */ - plist_del(node, &o->constraints); + plist_del(node, &o->constraints->list); plist_node_init(node, value); - plist_add(node, &o->constraints); + plist_add(node, &o->constraints->list); } else if (del) { - plist_del(node, &o->constraints); + plist_del(node, &o->constraints->list); } else { - plist_add(node, &o->constraints); + plist_add(node, &o->constraints->list); } curr_value = pm_qos_get_value(o); pm_qos_set_value(o, curr_value); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm_qos_lock, flags); if (prev_value != curr_value) - blocking_notifier_call_chain(o->notifiers, + blocking_notifier_call_chain(o->constraints->notifiers, (unsigned long)curr_value, NULL); } @@ -232,7 +224,7 @@ void pm_qos_add_request(struct pm_qos_request *req, return; } if (value == PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE) - new_value = o->default_value; + new_value = o->constraints->default_value; else new_value = value; plist_node_init(&req->node, new_value); @@ -268,7 +260,7 @@ void pm_qos_update_request(struct pm_qos_request *req, o = pm_qos_array[req->pm_qos_class]; if (new_value == PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE) - temp = o->default_value; + temp = o->constraints->default_value; else temp = new_value; @@ -317,7 +309,8 @@ int pm_qos_add_notifier(int pm_qos_class, struct notifier_block *notifier) int retval; retval = blocking_notifier_chain_register( - pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->notifiers, notifier); + pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->constraints->notifiers, + notifier); return retval; } @@ -336,7 +329,8 @@ int pm_qos_remove_notifier(int pm_qos_class, struct notifier_block *notifier) int retval; retval = blocking_notifier_chain_unregister( - pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->notifiers, notifier); + pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->constraints->notifiers, + notifier); return retval; }