@@ -5138,6 +5138,18 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
* to enter the kernel to reap and flush events.
*/
if (!to_submit || ret == -EBUSY) {
+ /*
+ * Drop cur_mm before scheduling, we can't hold it for
+ * long periods (or over schedule()). Do this before
+ * adding ourselves to the waitqueue, as the unuse/drop
+ * may sleep.
+ */
+ if (cur_mm) {
+ unuse_mm(cur_mm);
+ mmput(cur_mm);
+ cur_mm = NULL;
+ }
+
/*
* We're polling. If we're within the defined idle
* period, then let us spin without work before going
@@ -5152,18 +5164,6 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
continue;
}
- /*
- * Drop cur_mm before scheduling, we can't hold it for
- * long periods (or over schedule()). Do this before
- * adding ourselves to the waitqueue, as the unuse/drop
- * may sleep.
- */
- if (cur_mm) {
- unuse_mm(cur_mm);
- mmput(cur_mm);
- cur_mm = NULL;
- }
-
prepare_to_wait(&ctx->sqo_wait, &wait,
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
This patch drops 'cur_mm' before calling cond_resched(), to prevent the sq_thread from spinning even when the user process is finished. Before this patch, if the user process ended without closing the io_uring fd, the sq_thread continues to spin until the 'sq_thread_idle' timeout ends. In the worst case where the 'sq_thread_idle' parameter is bigger than INT_MAX, the sq_thread will spin forever. Fixes: 6c271ce2f1d5 ("io_uring: add submission polling") Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> --- Hi Jens, I'm also sending a test to liburing for this case. Cheers, Stefano --- fs/io_uring.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)