mbox series

[v9,0/4] arm64: mediatek: Fix mt8173 mmsys device probing

Message ID 20200226105419.632771-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series arm64: mediatek: Fix mt8173 mmsys device probing | expand

Message

Enric Balletbo i Serra Feb. 26, 2020, 10:54 a.m. UTC 
Dear all,

Those patches are intended to solve an old standing issue on some
Mediatek devices (mt8173, mt2701 and mt2712).

Up to now both drivers, clock and drm are probed with the same device tree
compatible. But only the first driver gets probed, which in effect breaks
graphics on those devices.

The MMSYS (Multimedia subsystem) in Mediatek SoCs has some registers to
control clock gates (which is used in the clk driver) and some registers
to set the routing and enable the differnet blocks of the display
and MDP (Media Data Path) subsystem. On this series the clk driver is
not a pure clock controller but a system controller that can provide
access to the shared registers between the different drivers that need
it (mediatek-drm and mediatek-mdp). Hence the MMSYS clk driver was moved
to drivers/soc/mediatek and is the entry point (parent) which will trigger
the probe of the corresponding mediatek-drm driver.

**IMPORTANT** This series only fixes the issue on mt8173 to make it
simple and as is the only platform I can test. Similar changes should be
applied for mt2701 and mt2712 to have display working.

For reference, here are the links to the old discussions:
* v8: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=244891
* v7: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=241217
* v6: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=213219
* v5: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=44063
* v4:
  * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10530871/
  * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10530883/
  * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10530885/
  * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10530911/
  * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10530913/
* v3:
  * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10367857/
  * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10367861/
  * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10367877/
  * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10367875/
  * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10367885/
  * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10367883/
  * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10367889/
  * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10367907/
  * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10367909/
  * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10367905/
* v2: No relevant discussion, see v3
* v1:
  * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10016497/
  * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10016499/
  * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10016505/
  * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10016507/

Best regards,
 Enric

Changes in v9:
- Move mmsys to drivers/soc/mediatek (CK)
- Do not move the display routing from the drm driver (CK)
- Removed from this series because are not needed:
  * [PATCH v8 5/6] drm/mediatek: Move MMSYS configuration to include/linux/platform_data
- Removed from this series because are applied:
  * [PATCH v8 3/6] media: mtk-mdp: Check return value of of_clk_get.

Changes in v8:
- Select REGMAP and MFD_SYSCON (Randy Dunlap)
- Be a builtin_platform_driver like other mediatek mmsys drivers.
- New patch introduced in this series.

Changes in v7:
- Add R-by from CK
- Free clk_data->clks as well
- Get rid of private data structure

Enric Balletbo i Serra (1):
  drm/mediatek: Fix mediatek-drm device probing

Matthias Brugger (3):
  drm/mediatek: Use regmap for register access
  drm/mediatek: Omit warning on probe defers
  soc: mediatek: Move mt8173 MMSYS to platform driver

 drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8173.c         | 104 ----------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/Kconfig          |   2 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_color.c |   5 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c   |   5 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c  |   5 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c        |  12 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c   |   4 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c    |  53 ++++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.h    |   4 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c    |  45 ++++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.h    |   2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c        |   8 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi.c       |   4 +-
 drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig              |   7 ++
 drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile             |   1 +
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8173-mmsys.c       | 143 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 16 files changed, 233 insertions(+), 171 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8173-mmsys.c

Comments

Ezequiel Garcia Feb. 26, 2020, 8:29 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 07:40 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 2/26/20 2:54 AM, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig
> > index 2114b563478c..dcd6481a14d0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig
> > @@ -44,4 +44,11 @@ config MTK_SCPSYS
> >  	  Say yes here to add support for the MediaTek SCPSYS power domain
> >  	  driver.
> >  
> > +config MT8173_MMSYS
> > +	bool "MediaTek MT8173 MMSYS Support"
> 
> Hi,
> Can this be tristate instead of bool?
> 

Wouldn't that conflict with
the driver being a builtin_platform_driver,
or am I just confusing things badly?

Thanks,
Ezequiel

> +	depends on COMMON_CLK_MT8173
> > +	help
> > +	  Say yes here to add support for the MediaTek MT8173 Multimedia
> > +	  Subsystem (MMSYS).
> > +
> >  endmenu
> 
> thanks.
> -- 
> ~Randy
> 
>
Randy Dunlap Feb. 26, 2020, 8:36 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 2/26/20 12:29 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 07:40 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 2/26/20 2:54 AM, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig
>>> index 2114b563478c..dcd6481a14d0 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig
>>> @@ -44,4 +44,11 @@ config MTK_SCPSYS
>>>  	  Say yes here to add support for the MediaTek SCPSYS power domain
>>>  	  driver.
>>>  
>>> +config MT8173_MMSYS
>>> +	bool "MediaTek MT8173 MMSYS Support"
>>
>> Hi,
>> Can this be tristate instead of bool?
>>
> 
> Wouldn't that conflict with
> the driver being a builtin_platform_driver,
> or am I just confusing things badly?

OK, it probably would conflict.

Thanks.

>> +	depends on COMMON_CLK_MT8173
>>> +	help
>>> +	  Say yes here to add support for the MediaTek MT8173 Multimedia
>>> +	  Subsystem (MMSYS).
>>> +
>>>  endmenu