Message ID | 20200302193630.68771-1-minchan@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | introduce memory hinting API for external process | expand |
On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 11:36:23 -0800 Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> wrote: > Now, we have MADV_PAGEOUT and MADV_COLD as madvise hinting API. With that, > application could give hints to kernel what memory range are preferred to be > reclaimed. However, in some platform(e.g., Android), the information > required to make the hinting decision is not known to the app. > Instead, it is known to a centralized userspace daemon(e.g., ActivityManagerService), > and that daemon must be able to initiate reclaim on its own without any app > involvement. > > To solve the concern, this patch introduces new syscall - process_madvise(2). > Bascially, it's same with madvise(2) syscall but it has some differences. > > 1. It needs pidfd of target process to provide the hint > 2. It supports only MADV_{COLD|PAGEOUT|MERGEABLE|UNMEREABLE} at this moment. > Other hints in madvise will be opened when there are explicit requests from > community to prevent unexpected bugs we couldn't support. > 3. Only privileged processes can do something for other process's address > space. > > For more detail of the new API, please see "mm: introduce external memory hinting API" > description in this patchset. Thanks, I grabbed these. I massaged the patch titles significantly - mainly to alert readers to the fact that we're proposing a new syscall. Is a manpage for process_madvise(2) being prepared?
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 01:16:18PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 11:36:23 -0800 Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> wrote: > > > Now, we have MADV_PAGEOUT and MADV_COLD as madvise hinting API. With that, > > application could give hints to kernel what memory range are preferred to be > > reclaimed. However, in some platform(e.g., Android), the information > > required to make the hinting decision is not known to the app. > > Instead, it is known to a centralized userspace daemon(e.g., ActivityManagerService), > > and that daemon must be able to initiate reclaim on its own without any app > > involvement. > > > > To solve the concern, this patch introduces new syscall - process_madvise(2). > > Bascially, it's same with madvise(2) syscall but it has some differences. > > > > 1. It needs pidfd of target process to provide the hint > > 2. It supports only MADV_{COLD|PAGEOUT|MERGEABLE|UNMEREABLE} at this moment. > > Other hints in madvise will be opened when there are explicit requests from > > community to prevent unexpected bugs we couldn't support. > > 3. Only privileged processes can do something for other process's address > > space. > > > > For more detail of the new API, please see "mm: introduce external memory hinting API" > > description in this patchset. > > Thanks, I grabbed these. > > I massaged the patch titles significantly - mainly to alert readers to > the fact that we're proposing a new syscall. > > Is a manpage for process_madvise(2) being prepared? I will prepare it, Thanks!