Message ID | 20200304153601.23423-1-philmd@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | misc: Replace zero-length arrays with flexible array member | expand |
On 3/4/20 4:35 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > v2: > - do not modify qed.h (structure with single member) > - based on hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi fix series > > This is a tree-wide cleanup inspired by a Linux kernel commit > (from Gustavo A. R. Silva). Please ignore, for some reason the 'v2' tag is missing.
On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:35:59 +0100 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> wrote: > v2: > - do not modify qed.h (structure with single member) > - based on hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi fix series > > This is a tree-wide cleanup inspired by a Linux kernel commit > (from Gustavo A. R. Silva). > > --v-- description start --v-- > > The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language > extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to > declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible > array member [1], introduced in C99: > > struct foo { > int stuff; > struct boo array[]; > }; > > By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler > warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the > structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined > behavior bugs from being unadvertenly introduced [2] to the > Linux codebase from now on. > > --^-- description end --^-- > > Do the similar housekeeping in the QEMU codebase (which uses > C99 since commit 7be41675f7cb). > > The first patch is done with the help of a coccinelle semantic > patch. However Coccinelle does not recognize: > > struct foo { > int stuff; > struct boo array[]; > } QEMU_PACKED; > > but does recognize: > > struct QEMU_PACKED foo { > int stuff; > struct boo array[]; > }; > > I'm not sure why, neither it is worth refactoring all QEMU > structures to use the attributes before the structure name, > so I did the 2nd patch manually. > > Anyway this is annoying, because many structures are not handled > by coccinelle. Maybe this needs to be reported to upstream > coccinelle? > > I used spatch 1.0.8 with: > > -I include --include-headers \ > --macro-file scripts/cocci-macro-file.h \ > --keep-comments --indent 4 > > Regards, > > Phil. > > Based-on: <20200304153311.22959-1-philmd@redhat.com> > Supersedes: <20200304005105.27454-1-philmd@redhat.com> For acpi parts Acked-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> > > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (2): > misc: Replace zero-length arrays with flexible array member > (automatic) > misc: Replace zero-length arrays with flexible array member (manual) > > docs/interop/vhost-user.rst | 4 ++-- > bsd-user/qemu.h | 2 +- > contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.h | 2 +- > hw/m68k/bootinfo.h | 2 +- > hw/scsi/srp.h | 6 +++--- > hw/xen/xen_pt.h | 2 +- > include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h | 16 ++++++++-------- > include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h | 2 +- > include/hw/boards.h | 2 +- > include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h | 3 ++- > include/hw/s390x/event-facility.h | 2 +- > include/hw/s390x/sclp.h | 8 ++++---- > include/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.h | 2 +- > include/sysemu/cryptodev.h | 2 +- > include/tcg/tcg.h | 2 +- > pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.h | 2 +- > pc-bios/s390-ccw/sclp.h | 2 +- > tests/qtest/libqos/ahci.h | 2 +- > block/linux-aio.c | 2 +- > block/vmdk.c | 2 +- > hw/acpi/nvdimm.c | 6 +++--- > hw/char/sclpconsole-lm.c | 2 +- > hw/char/sclpconsole.c | 2 +- > hw/dma/soc_dma.c | 2 +- > hw/i386/x86.c | 2 +- > hw/misc/omap_l4.c | 2 +- > hw/nvram/eeprom93xx.c | 2 +- > hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_qp_ops.c | 4 ++-- > hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c | 2 +- > hw/usb/dev-network.c | 2 +- > hw/usb/dev-smartcard-reader.c | 4 ++-- > hw/virtio/virtio.c | 4 ++-- > net/queue.c | 2 +- > target/s390x/ioinst.c | 2 +- > 34 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) >