Message ID | 20200323184627.ZWPg91uin%akpm@linux-foundation.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Delegated to: | Jason Gunthorpe |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/1] drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_rx.c: suppress uninitialized var warning | expand |
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 11:46:27AM -0700, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote: > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > Subject: drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_rx.c: suppress uninitialized var warning > > drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_rx.c: In function siw_proc_send: > ./include/linux/spinlock.h:288:3: warning: flags may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags); \ > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_rx.c:335:16: note: flags was declared here > unsigned long flags; > > Cc: Bernard Metzler <bmt@zurich.ibm.com> > Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > --- > > drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_rx.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > It is unclear to me how is that possible. Thanks, Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 11:46:27AM -0700, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote: > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > Subject: drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_rx.c: suppress uninitialized var warning > > drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_rx.c: In function siw_proc_send: > ./include/linux/spinlock.h:288:3: warning: flags may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags); \ > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_rx.c:335:16: note: flags was declared here > unsigned long flags; > > Cc: Bernard Metzler <bmt@zurich.ibm.com> > Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > --- > > drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_rx.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Applied to for-next, though I suppose gcc fixed this at some point as I don't see the warning here... Thanks, Jason
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_rx.c~drivers-infiniband-sw-siw-siw_qp_rxc-suppress-uninitialized-var-warning +++ a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_rx.c @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ static struct siw_wqe *siw_rqe_get(struc struct siw_srq *srq; struct siw_wqe *wqe = NULL; bool srq_event = false; - unsigned long flags; + unsigned long uninitialized_var(flags); srq = qp->srq; if (srq) {