diff mbox series

[v5,3/5] thermal: devfreq_cooling: Use PM QoS to set frequency limits

Message ID 20200318114548.19916-4-lukasz.luba@arm.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Add support for devices in the Energy Model | expand

Commit Message

Lukasz Luba March 18, 2020, 11:45 a.m. UTC 
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>

Now that devfreq supports limiting the frequency range of a device
through PM QoS make use of it instead of disabling OPPs that should
not be used.

The switch from disabling OPPs to PM QoS introduces a subtle behavioral
change in case of conflicting requests (min > max): PM QoS gives
precedence to the MIN_FREQUENCY request, while higher OPPs disabled
with dev_pm_opp_disable() would override MIN_FREQUENCY.

Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
---

Added missing Chanwoo's Reviewed-by in posted patch v3.

 drivers/thermal/devfreq_cooling.c | 70 ++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

Comments

Daniel Lezcano April 3, 2020, 4:43 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 18/03/2020 12:45, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
> 
> Now that devfreq supports limiting the frequency range of a device
> through PM QoS make use of it instead of disabling OPPs that should
> not be used.
> 
> The switch from disabling OPPs to PM QoS introduces a subtle behavioral
> change in case of conflicting requests (min > max): PM QoS gives
> precedence to the MIN_FREQUENCY request, while higher OPPs disabled
> with dev_pm_opp_disable() would override MIN_FREQUENCY.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>

This patch is standalone, right? If yes, I will apply it.
Matthias Kaehlcke April 3, 2020, 5:18 p.m. UTC | #2 
Hi Daniel,

On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 06:43:20PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 18/03/2020 12:45, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> > From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
> > 
> > Now that devfreq supports limiting the frequency range of a device
> > through PM QoS make use of it instead of disabling OPPs that should
> > not be used.
> > 
> > The switch from disabling OPPs to PM QoS introduces a subtle behavioral
> > change in case of conflicting requests (min > max): PM QoS gives
> > precedence to the MIN_FREQUENCY request, while higher OPPs disabled
> > with dev_pm_opp_disable() would override MIN_FREQUENCY.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
> 
> This patch is standalone, right? If yes, I will apply it.

Yes, it is standalone, please apply

Thanks

Matthias
Daniel Lezcano April 3, 2020, 5:19 p.m. UTC | #3 
On 03/04/2020 19:18, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 06:43:20PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 18/03/2020 12:45, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>>> From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
>>>
>>> Now that devfreq supports limiting the frequency range of a device
>>> through PM QoS make use of it instead of disabling OPPs that should
>>> not be used.
>>>
>>> The switch from disabling OPPs to PM QoS introduces a subtle behavioral
>>> change in case of conflicting requests (min > max): PM QoS gives
>>> precedence to the MIN_FREQUENCY request, while higher OPPs disabled
>>> with dev_pm_opp_disable() would override MIN_FREQUENCY.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
>>
>> This patch is standalone, right? If yes, I will apply it.
> 
> Yes, it is standalone, please apply

Applied on 'testing', thanks
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/devfreq_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/devfreq_cooling.c
index a87d4fa031c8..f7f32e98331b 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/devfreq_cooling.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/devfreq_cooling.c
@@ -24,11 +24,13 @@ 
 #include <linux/idr.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
+#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
 #include <linux/thermal.h>
 
 #include <trace/events/thermal.h>
 
-#define SCALE_ERROR_MITIGATION 100
+#define HZ_PER_KHZ		1000
+#define SCALE_ERROR_MITIGATION	100
 
 static DEFINE_IDA(devfreq_ida);
 
@@ -54,6 +56,8 @@  static DEFINE_IDA(devfreq_ida);
  *		The 'res_util' range is from 100 to (power_table[state] * 100)
  *		for the corresponding 'state'.
  * @capped_state:	index to cooling state with in dynamic power budget
+ * @req_max_freq:	PM QoS request for limiting the maximum frequency
+ *			of the devfreq device.
  */
 struct devfreq_cooling_device {
 	int id;
@@ -66,49 +70,9 @@  struct devfreq_cooling_device {
 	struct devfreq_cooling_power *power_ops;
 	u32 res_util;
 	int capped_state;
+	struct dev_pm_qos_request req_max_freq;
 };
 
-/**
- * partition_enable_opps() - disable all opps above a given state
- * @dfc:	Pointer to devfreq we are operating on
- * @cdev_state:	cooling device state we're setting
- *
- * Go through the OPPs of the device, enabling all OPPs until
- * @cdev_state and disabling those frequencies above it.
- */
-static int partition_enable_opps(struct devfreq_cooling_device *dfc,
-				 unsigned long cdev_state)
-{
-	int i;
-	struct device *dev = dfc->devfreq->dev.parent;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < dfc->freq_table_size; i++) {
-		struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
-		int ret = 0;
-		unsigned int freq = dfc->freq_table[i];
-		bool want_enable = i >= cdev_state ? true : false;
-
-		opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact(dev, freq, !want_enable);
-
-		if (PTR_ERR(opp) == -ERANGE)
-			continue;
-		else if (IS_ERR(opp))
-			return PTR_ERR(opp);
-
-		dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
-
-		if (want_enable)
-			ret = dev_pm_opp_enable(dev, freq);
-		else
-			ret = dev_pm_opp_disable(dev, freq);
-
-		if (ret)
-			return ret;
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int devfreq_cooling_get_max_state(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev,
 					 unsigned long *state)
 {
@@ -135,7 +99,7 @@  static int devfreq_cooling_set_cur_state(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev,
 	struct devfreq_cooling_device *dfc = cdev->devdata;
 	struct devfreq *df = dfc->devfreq;
 	struct device *dev = df->dev.parent;
-	int ret;
+	unsigned long freq;
 
 	if (state == dfc->cooling_state)
 		return 0;
@@ -145,9 +109,10 @@  static int devfreq_cooling_set_cur_state(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev,
 	if (state >= dfc->freq_table_size)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	ret = partition_enable_opps(dfc, state);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+	freq = dfc->freq_table[state];
+
+	dev_pm_qos_update_request(&dfc->req_max_freq,
+				  DIV_ROUND_UP(freq, HZ_PER_KHZ));
 
 	dfc->cooling_state = state;
 
@@ -530,9 +495,15 @@  of_devfreq_cooling_register_power(struct device_node *np, struct devfreq *df,
 	if (err)
 		goto free_dfc;
 
-	err = ida_simple_get(&devfreq_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
+	err = dev_pm_qos_add_request(df->dev.parent, &dfc->req_max_freq,
+				     DEV_PM_QOS_MAX_FREQUENCY,
+				     PM_QOS_MAX_FREQUENCY_DEFAULT_VALUE);
 	if (err < 0)
 		goto free_tables;
+
+	err = ida_simple_get(&devfreq_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (err < 0)
+		goto remove_qos_req;
 	dfc->id = err;
 
 	snprintf(dev_name, sizeof(dev_name), "thermal-devfreq-%d", dfc->id);
@@ -553,6 +524,10 @@  of_devfreq_cooling_register_power(struct device_node *np, struct devfreq *df,
 
 release_ida:
 	ida_simple_remove(&devfreq_ida, dfc->id);
+
+remove_qos_req:
+	dev_pm_qos_remove_request(&dfc->req_max_freq);
+
 free_tables:
 	kfree(dfc->power_table);
 	kfree(dfc->freq_table);
@@ -601,6 +576,7 @@  void devfreq_cooling_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
 
 	thermal_cooling_device_unregister(dfc->cdev);
 	ida_simple_remove(&devfreq_ida, dfc->id);
+	dev_pm_qos_remove_request(&dfc->req_max_freq);
 	kfree(dfc->power_table);
 	kfree(dfc->freq_table);