diff mbox series

[v6,07/12] ARM: DTS: omap5: add sgx gpu child node

Message ID 004611c9660943759b635a87484932869927cf74.1586939718.git.hns@goldelico.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series ARM/MIPS: DTS: add child nodes describing the PVRSGX GPU present in some OMAP SoC and JZ4780 (and many more) | expand

Commit Message

H. Nikolaus Schaller April 15, 2020, 8:35 a.m. UTC
and add interrupt.

Tested-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com> # Pyra-Handheld.
Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

H. Nikolaus Schaller April 15, 2020, 11:46 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Krzysztof,

> Am 15.04.2020 um 13:38 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>:
> 
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 10:36, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com> wrote:
>> 
>> and add interrupt.
>> 
>> Tested-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com> # Pyra-Handheld.
> 
> Don't add your own Tested-by tags. These are implied by authorship,
> otherwise all patches people make should have such tag.

Ok I see. AFAIR it originates in several phases of editing to report on which device it was tested.

Is there a canonical way of writing "tested-on: ${HARDWARE}"?

E.g. would this be ok?

Signed-off: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com> # tested on Pyra-Handheld

BR and thanks,
Nikolaus Schaller
H. Nikolaus Schaller April 15, 2020, 2:07 p.m. UTC | #2
> Am 15.04.2020 um 15:47 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>:
> 
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 01:46:06PM +0200, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>> 
>>> Am 15.04.2020 um 13:38 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>:
>>> 
>>> On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 10:36, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> and add interrupt.
>>>> 
>>>> Tested-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com> # Pyra-Handheld.
>>> 
>>> Don't add your own Tested-by tags. These are implied by authorship,
>>> otherwise all patches people make should have such tag.
>> 
>> Ok I see. AFAIR it originates in several phases of editing to report on which device it was tested.
>> 
>> Is there a canonical way of writing "tested-on: ${HARDWARE}"?
>> 
>> E.g. would this be ok?
>> 
>> Signed-off: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com> # tested on Pyra-Handheld
> 
> If you think tested platform is worth mentioning in the commit msg
> (it will stay there forever, ever, ever) then just add a line like:
> 
> "Add SGX GPU node. Tested on Pyra-Handheld."
> 
> From time to time we add such information to note that only one platform
> was actually tested.

Yes that is what it should express.

>  I am not sure what benefit it brings to most
> cases... but your commit msg is so short that adding one more sentence
> seems reasonable. :)

Ok, will queue for v7.

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

BR and thanks,
Nikolaus
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi
index 2ac7f021c284..1cf41664fd00 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@  sata: sata@4a141100 {
 			ports-implemented = <0x1>;
 		};
 
-		target-module@56000000 {
+		sgx_module: target-module@56000000 {
 			compatible = "ti,sysc-omap4", "ti,sysc";
 			reg = <0x5600fe00 0x4>,
 			      <0x5600fe10 0x4>;
@@ -287,10 +287,11 @@  target-module@56000000 {
 			#size-cells = <1>;
 			ranges = <0 0x56000000 0x2000000>;
 
-			/*
-			 * Closed source PowerVR driver, no child device
-			 * binding or driver in mainline
-			 */
+			gpu: gpu@0 {
+				compatible = "ti,omap5-sgx544-116", "img,sgx544-116", "img,sgx544";
+				reg = <0x0 0x10000>;
+				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 21 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			};
 		};
 
 		target-module@58000000 {