Message ID | 20200422120532.31492-1-mateusz.gorski@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add support for different DMIC configurations | expand |
On 2020-04-22 14:05, Mateusz Gorski wrote: > Set of patches to enable DMIC capture on different hardware > configurations. > Information about supported DMIC configuration is read from NHLT and > correct pipeline configuration is selected automatically. > Also, adding additional option for topology binary name which is > based on used machine driver. *seems like this thread is missing few maintainers in CC* > > Mateusz Gorski (3): > ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Add alternative topology binary name > ASoC: Intel: Multiple I/O PCM format support for pipe > ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Automatic DMIC format configuration according to > information from NHLT > > Changes in v2: > - removed patch 1/4 swapping machine device and platform device > registration order > - alt_tplg_name creation now uses different field to read machine driver > name > - including of <sound/soc-acpi.h> moved to different patch Ain't change-block supposed to be just below message body? > > include/uapi/sound/skl-tplg-interface.h | 2 + > sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-topology.c | 189 +++++++++++++++++++++++- > sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-topology.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > You have forgotten to add my Reviewed-by tag as both, v1 and v2 were reviewed by me internally before upstreaming. Thanks for addressing Pierre's review - indeed i2s_dev field usage could have been avoided. Good review, Pierre. Don't believe series need to be resend just to fix cosmetics: Acked-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 11:11:05AM +0200, Cezary Rojewski wrote: > On 2020-04-22 14:05, Mateusz Gorski wrote: > > Changes in v2: > > - removed patch 1/4 swapping machine device and platform device > > registration order > > - alt_tplg_name creation now uses different field to read machine driver > > name > > - including of <sound/soc-acpi.h> moved to different patch > Ain't change-block supposed to be just below message body? Only in patches to stop them getting included in the git changelog. > Don't believe series need to be resend just to fix cosmetics: > Acked-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com> Well, I don't seem to have a copy of it so it'll need a resend for that unless it's just held up somewhere and arrives shortly.
On 2020-04-23 12:21, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 11:11:05AM +0200, Cezary Rojewski wrote: >> On 2020-04-22 14:05, Mateusz Gorski wrote: > >>> Changes in v2: >>> - removed patch 1/4 swapping machine device and platform device >>> registration order >>> - alt_tplg_name creation now uses different field to read machine driver >>> name >>> - including of <sound/soc-acpi.h> moved to different patch > >> Ain't change-block supposed to be just below message body? > > Only in patches to stop them getting included in the git changelog. > Thanks for info, Mark. >> Don't believe series need to be resend just to fix cosmetics: >> Acked-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com> > > Well, I don't seem to have a copy of it so it'll need a resend for that > unless it's just held up somewhere and arrives shortly. > Doubt it will as Mateusz forgot to include you & Pierre in v2. Resend it is then!