| Message ID | 20200427073132.29997-3-wens@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | arm64: dts: rockchip: misc. cleanups and improvements | expand |
Hi Chen-Yu, > From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> > > With SDIO now enabled, the numbering of the existing MMC host controllers > gets incremented by 1, as the SDIO host is the first one. > > Increment the numbering of the MMC LED triggers to match. > > Fixes: cf3c5397835f ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable sdio0 and uart0 on rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine") > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts | 8 ++++++++ > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts > index 2acb3d500fb9..f0686fc276be 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts > @@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ vcc3v3_pcie: vcc3v3-pcie { > }; > }; > > +&diy_led { > + linux,default-trigger = "mmc2"; > +}; > + > &pcie_phy { > status = "okay"; > }; > @@ -91,3 +95,7 @@ &uart0 { > pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_xfer &uart0_cts &uart0_rts>; > status = "okay"; > }; > + > +&yellow_led { > + linux,default-trigger = "mmc1"; > +}; > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi > index 9f225e9c3d54..bc060ac7972d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi > @@ -70,14 +70,14 @@ work-led { > linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat"; > }; > > - diy-led { > + diy_led: diy-led { This changes an existing nodename into something that is still not the preferred way. In the current Rockchip dts there are nodenames like 'work', 'yellow' that causing warnings with the command: make -k ARCH=arm dtbs_check Could you give a generic guide line/example, so all these changes are treated the same way? As if the naming follows the preferred 'led-0' line. > label = "red:diy"; > gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > default-state = "off"; > linux,default-trigger = "mmc1"; > }; > > - yellow-led { > + yellow_led: yellow-led { > label = "yellow:yellow-led"; > gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > default-state = "off"; > -- > 2.26.0
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 4:57 PM Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Chen-Yu, > > > From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> > > > > With SDIO now enabled, the numbering of the existing MMC host controllers > > gets incremented by 1, as the SDIO host is the first one. > > > > Increment the numbering of the MMC LED triggers to match. > > > > Fixes: cf3c5397835f ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable sdio0 and uart0 on rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine") > > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> > > --- > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts | 8 ++++++++ > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi | 4 ++-- > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts > > index 2acb3d500fb9..f0686fc276be 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts > > @@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ vcc3v3_pcie: vcc3v3-pcie { > > }; > > }; > > > > +&diy_led { > > + linux,default-trigger = "mmc2"; > > +}; > > + > > &pcie_phy { > > status = "okay"; > > }; > > @@ -91,3 +95,7 @@ &uart0 { > > pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_xfer &uart0_cts &uart0_rts>; > > status = "okay"; > > }; > > + > > +&yellow_led { > > + linux,default-trigger = "mmc1"; > > +}; > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi > > index 9f225e9c3d54..bc060ac7972d 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi > > @@ -70,14 +70,14 @@ work-led { > > linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat"; > > }; > > > > > - diy-led { > > + diy_led: diy-led { > > This changes an existing nodename into something that is still not the > preferred way. In the current Rockchip dts there are nodenames like > 'work', 'yellow' that causing warnings with the command: This doesn't change the node name at all. It only adds a label. If it doesn't pass the check now, it didn't pass the check before. I just realized that the footnote I added before is gone because I regenerated the patches. The original footnote was something along the lines of: I opted to not change the node names nor the labels as the discussion had not concluded. The other reason being that people may have scripts or device tree overlays depending on the existing node names. Previously I asked the following but got no response: Is changing this after it has been in some kernel releases OK? Wouldn't it be considered a break of sysfs ABI? Also, is there some guideline on how to name the labels? For sunxi we've been doing "${vendor}:${color}:${function}" since forever. As far as I can tell, the hardware vendor [1] has no specific uses for these two (red and yellow) LEDs designed in. And their GPIO lines are simply labeled "DIY" (for the red one) and "YELLOW". So I'm not sure if putting "our" interpretations and the default-trigger into the label is wise. For reference, the green one has its GPIO line labeled "WORK", and their intention from [1] is to have it as some sort of power / activity indicator. Hence it is named / labeled "work". As for the node names, I think we can keep it as is for now. It's not the preferred form, but there's really no need to change it either. And some overlay or script might actually expect that name. > make -k ARCH=arm dtbs_check > > Could you give a generic guide line/example, so all these changes are > treated the same way? As if the naming follows the preferred 'led-0' line. I'm not sure what you are asking for. ChenYu > > label = "red:diy"; > > gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > > default-state = "off"; > > linux,default-trigger = "mmc1"; > > }; > > > > - yellow-led { > > + yellow_led: yellow-led { > > label = "yellow:yellow-led"; > > gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > > default-state = "off"; > > -- > > 2.26.0 >
On 4/27/20 11:17 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 4:57 PM Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Chen-Yu, >> >>> From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> >>> >>> With SDIO now enabled, the numbering of the existing MMC host controllers >>> gets incremented by 1, as the SDIO host is the first one. >>> >>> Increment the numbering of the MMC LED triggers to match. >>> >>> Fixes: cf3c5397835f ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable sdio0 and uart0 on rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine") >>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> >>> --- >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts | 8 ++++++++ >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi | 4 ++-- >>> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts >>> index 2acb3d500fb9..f0686fc276be 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts >>> @@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ vcc3v3_pcie: vcc3v3-pcie { >>> }; >>> }; >>> >>> +&diy_led { >>> + linux,default-trigger = "mmc2"; If you decide to use a free form trigger that is not a 'standard' one, then it becomes a user property. User defined properties should not go in a generic dts. It's up to the user what function he/she gives to that led! >>> +}; >>> + >>> &pcie_phy { >>> status = "okay"; >>> }; >>> @@ -91,3 +95,7 @@ &uart0 { >>> pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_xfer &uart0_cts &uart0_rts>; >>> status = "okay"; >>> }; >>> + >>> +&yellow_led { >>> + linux,default-trigger = "mmc1"; >>> +}; >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi >>> index 9f225e9c3d54..bc060ac7972d 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi >>> @@ -70,14 +70,14 @@ work-led { >>> linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat"; >>> }; >>> >> >>> - diy-led { >>> + diy_led: diy-led { >> >> This changes an existing nodename into something that is still not the Correction: It takes an existing nodename and adds a label. >> preferred way. In the current Rockchip dts there are nodenames like >> 'work', 'yellow' that causing warnings with the command: > > This doesn't change the node name at all. It only adds a label. > If it doesn't pass the check now, it didn't pass the check before. > > I just realized that the footnote I added before is gone because I > regenerated the patches. The original footnote was something along > the lines of: > > I opted to not change the node names nor the labels as the discussion > had not concluded. The other reason being that people may have scripts > or device tree overlays depending on the existing node names. > > Previously I asked the following but got no response: > > Is changing this after it has been in some kernel releases OK? Wouldn't > it be considered a break of sysfs ABI? > > Also, is there some guideline on how to name the labels? For sunxi we've > been doing "${vendor}:${color}:${function}" since forever. > > As far as I can tell, the hardware vendor [1] has no specific uses for > these two (red and yellow) LEDs designed in. And their GPIO lines are > simply labeled "DIY" (for the red one) and "YELLOW". So I'm not sure > if putting "our" interpretations and the default-trigger into the > label is wise. > > For reference, the green one has its GPIO line labeled "WORK", and their > intention from [1] is to have it as some sort of power / activity indicator. > Hence it is named / labeled "work". > > As for the node names, I think we can keep it as is for now. It's not > the preferred form, but there's really no need to change it either. > And some overlay or script might actually expect that name. > >> make -k ARCH=arm dtbs_check >> >> Could you give a generic guide line/example, so all these changes are >> treated the same way? As if the naming follows the preferred 'led-0' line. > > I'm not sure what you are asking for. Your nodename just happend to contain 'led' to pass the regex. There are many other names in use. 'If' the DT maintainer (=Heiko) decides the get rid of all the warnings for led nodes then that change would require all nodename to be handled to same (=preferred way): Change this: diy_led: diy-led yellow_led: yellow-led Into something like: led_0: led-0 led_1: led-1 > > ChenYu > >>> label = "red:diy"; >>> gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; >>> default-state = "off"; >>> linux,default-trigger = "mmc1"; >>> }; >>> >>> - yellow-led { >>> + yellow_led: yellow-led { >>> label = "yellow:yellow-led"; >>> gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; >>> default-state = "off"; >>> -- >>> 2.26.0 >>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 6:09 PM Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 4/27/20 11:17 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 4:57 PM Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Chen-Yu, > >> > >>> From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> > >>> > >>> With SDIO now enabled, the numbering of the existing MMC host controllers > >>> gets incremented by 1, as the SDIO host is the first one. > >>> > >>> Increment the numbering of the MMC LED triggers to match. > >>> > >>> Fixes: cf3c5397835f ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable sdio0 and uart0 on rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine") > >>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> > >>> --- > >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts | 8 ++++++++ > >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi | 4 ++-- > >>> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts > >>> index 2acb3d500fb9..f0686fc276be 100644 > >>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts > >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts > >>> @@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ vcc3v3_pcie: vcc3v3-pcie { > >>> }; > >>> }; > >>> > >>> +&diy_led { > > >>> + linux,default-trigger = "mmc2"; > > If you decide to use a free form trigger that is not a 'standard' one, > then it becomes a user property. > User defined properties should not go in a generic dts. > It's up to the user what function he/she gives to that led! The original (in the base .dtsi file for this series of boards) trigger is already a non-standard, i.e. not listed in the bindings, one. Now I would very much like to get rid of user specific stuff, and I also mentioned that in the previous round of discussions. No one said anything. > >>> +}; > >>> + > >>> &pcie_phy { > >>> status = "okay"; > >>> }; > >>> @@ -91,3 +95,7 @@ &uart0 { > >>> pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_xfer &uart0_cts &uart0_rts>; > >>> status = "okay"; > >>> }; > >>> + > >>> +&yellow_led { > >>> + linux,default-trigger = "mmc1"; > >>> +}; > >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi > >>> index 9f225e9c3d54..bc060ac7972d 100644 > >>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi > >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi > >>> @@ -70,14 +70,14 @@ work-led { > >>> linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat"; > >>> }; > >>> > >> > >>> - diy-led { > >>> + diy_led: diy-led { > >> > >> This changes an existing nodename into something that is still not the > > Correction: > It takes an existing nodename and adds a label. OK. > >> preferred way. In the current Rockchip dts there are nodenames like > >> 'work', 'yellow' that causing warnings with the command: > > > > This doesn't change the node name at all. It only adds a label. > > If it doesn't pass the check now, it didn't pass the check before. > > > > I just realized that the footnote I added before is gone because I > > regenerated the patches. The original footnote was something along > > the lines of: > > > > I opted to not change the node names nor the labels as the discussion > > had not concluded. The other reason being that people may have scripts > > or device tree overlays depending on the existing node names. > > > > Previously I asked the following but got no response: > > > > Is changing this after it has been in some kernel releases OK? Wouldn't > > it be considered a break of sysfs ABI? > > > > Also, is there some guideline on how to name the labels? For sunxi we've > > been doing "${vendor}:${color}:${function}" since forever. > > > > As far as I can tell, the hardware vendor [1] has no specific uses for > > these two (red and yellow) LEDs designed in. And their GPIO lines are > > simply labeled "DIY" (for the red one) and "YELLOW". So I'm not sure > > if putting "our" interpretations and the default-trigger into the > > label is wise. > > > > For reference, the green one has its GPIO line labeled "WORK", and their > > intention from [1] is to have it as some sort of power / activity indicator. > > Hence it is named / labeled "work". > > > > As for the node names, I think we can keep it as is for now. It's not > > the preferred form, but there's really no need to change it either. > > And some overlay or script might actually expect that name. > > > >> make -k ARCH=arm dtbs_check > >> > >> Could you give a generic guide line/example, so all these changes are > >> treated the same way? As if the naming follows the preferred 'led-0' line. > > > > I'm not sure what you are asking for. > > Your nodename just happend to contain 'led' to pass the regex. > There are many other names in use. Right. So if it passes, what's the problem? > 'If' the DT maintainer (=Heiko) decides the get rid of all the warnings > for led nodes then that change would require all nodename to be handled > to same (=preferred way): > > Change this: > > diy_led: diy-led > yellow_led: yellow-led > > Into something like: > > led_0: led-0 > led_1: led-1 As I already said, if the maintainers want to clean this up, I am happy to provide patches towards this. That is not the case right now. Furthermore, that cleanup is not directly related to what I'm trying to fix in this patch, which is, from the original submitter's point of view, incorrect triggers are used when the mezzanine board is added. Also, DT labels "led_0" and "led_1" are useless. They have no relation to what is used in the schematics, which are "work", "diy", and "yellow". The board itself doesn't have anything silk-screened on, so on that end the only thing to go with is the color. So for fixing up the LED node names, we'd probably want the following: diy_led: led-0 yellow_led: led-1 work_led: led-2 Is that what you're asking for? ChenYu > > > > ChenYu > > > >>> label = "red:diy"; > >>> gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > >>> default-state = "off"; > >>> linux,default-trigger = "mmc1"; > >>> }; > >>> > >>> - yellow-led { > >>> + yellow_led: yellow-led { > >>> label = "yellow:yellow-led"; > >>> gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > >>> default-state = "off"; > >>> -- > >>> 2.26.0 > >> >
On 4/27/20 12:33 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 6:09 PM Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 4/27/20 11:17 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 4:57 PM Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Chen-Yu, >>>> >>>>> From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> >>>>> >>>>> With SDIO now enabled, the numbering of the existing MMC host controllers >>>>> gets incremented by 1, as the SDIO host is the first one. >>>>> >>>>> Increment the numbering of the MMC LED triggers to match. >>>>> >>>>> Fixes: cf3c5397835f ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable sdio0 and uart0 on rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine") >>>>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> >>>>> --- >>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts | 8 ++++++++ >>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi | 4 ++-- >>>>> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts >>>>> index 2acb3d500fb9..f0686fc276be 100644 >>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts >>>>> @@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ vcc3v3_pcie: vcc3v3-pcie { >>>>> }; >>>>> }; >>>>> >>>>> +&diy_led { >> >>>>> + linux,default-trigger = "mmc2"; >> >> If you decide to use a free form trigger that is not a 'standard' one, >> then it becomes a user property. >> User defined properties should not go in a generic dts. >> It's up to the user what function he/she gives to that led! > > The original (in the base .dtsi file for this series of boards) trigger > is already a non-standard, i.e. not listed in the bindings, one. > > Now I would very much like to get rid of user specific stuff, and I > also mentioned that in the previous round of discussions. No one said > anything. > >>>>> +}; >>>>> + >>>>> &pcie_phy { >>>>> status = "okay"; >>>>> }; >>>>> @@ -91,3 +95,7 @@ &uart0 { >>>>> pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_xfer &uart0_cts &uart0_rts>; >>>>> status = "okay"; >>>>> }; >>>>> + >>>>> +&yellow_led { >>>>> + linux,default-trigger = "mmc1"; >>>>> +}; >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi >>>>> index 9f225e9c3d54..bc060ac7972d 100644 >>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi >>>>> @@ -70,14 +70,14 @@ work-led { >>>>> linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat"; >>>>> }; >>>>> >>>> >>>>> - diy-led { >>>>> + diy_led: diy-led { >>>> >>>> This changes an existing nodename into something that is still not the >> >> Correction: >> It takes an existing nodename and adds a label. > > OK. > >>>> preferred way. In the current Rockchip dts there are nodenames like >>>> 'work', 'yellow' that causing warnings with the command: >>> >>> This doesn't change the node name at all. It only adds a label. >>> If it doesn't pass the check now, it didn't pass the check before. >>> >>> I just realized that the footnote I added before is gone because I >>> regenerated the patches. The original footnote was something along >>> the lines of: >>> >>> I opted to not change the node names nor the labels as the discussion >>> had not concluded. The other reason being that people may have scripts >>> or device tree overlays depending on the existing node names. >>> >>> Previously I asked the following but got no response: >>> >>> Is changing this after it has been in some kernel releases OK? Wouldn't >>> it be considered a break of sysfs ABI? >>> >>> Also, is there some guideline on how to name the labels? For sunxi we've >>> been doing "${vendor}:${color}:${function}" since forever. >>> >>> As far as I can tell, the hardware vendor [1] has no specific uses for >>> these two (red and yellow) LEDs designed in. And their GPIO lines are >>> simply labeled "DIY" (for the red one) and "YELLOW". So I'm not sure >>> if putting "our" interpretations and the default-trigger into the >>> label is wise. >>> >>> For reference, the green one has its GPIO line labeled "WORK", and their >>> intention from [1] is to have it as some sort of power / activity indicator. >>> Hence it is named / labeled "work". >>> >>> As for the node names, I think we can keep it as is for now. It's not >>> the preferred form, but there's really no need to change it either. >>> And some overlay or script might actually expect that name. >>> >>>> make -k ARCH=arm dtbs_check >>>> >>>> Could you give a generic guide line/example, so all these changes are >>>> treated the same way? As if the naming follows the preferred 'led-0' line. >>> >>> I'm not sure what you are asking for. >> >> Your nodename just happend to contain 'led' to pass the regex. >> There are many other names in use. > > Right. So if it passes, what's the problem? > >> 'If' the DT maintainer (=Heiko) decides the get rid of all the warnings >> for led nodes then that change would require all nodename to be handled >> to same (=preferred way): >> >> Change this: >> >> diy_led: diy-led >> yellow_led: yellow-led >> >> Into something like: >> >> led_0: led-0 >> led_1: led-1 > > As I already said, if the maintainers want to clean this up, I am happy to > provide patches towards this. That is not the case right now. Furthermore, > that cleanup is not directly related to what I'm trying to fix in this > patch, which is, from the original submitter's point of view, incorrect > triggers are used when the mezzanine board is added. > > Also, DT labels "led_0" and "led_1" are useless. They have no relation to > what is used in the schematics, which are "work", "diy", and "yellow". The > board itself doesn't have anything silk-screened on, so on that end the only > thing to go with is the color. > > So for fixing up the LED node names, we'd probably want the following: > > diy_led: led-0 > yellow_led: led-1 > work_led: led-2 That doesn't look pretty either. Would like to hear the maintainers view on how to handle other cases without 'led' like for example 'blue' for mk808. > > Is that what you're asking for? > > > ChenYu > >>> >>> ChenYu >>> >>>>> label = "red:diy"; >>>>> gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; >>>>> default-state = "off"; >>>>> linux,default-trigger = "mmc1"; >>>>> }; >>>>> >>>>> - yellow-led { >>>>> + yellow_led: yellow-led { >>>>> label = "yellow:yellow-led"; >>>>> gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; >>>>> default-state = "off"; >>>>> -- >>>>> 2.26.0 >>>> >>
Hi, >> So for fixing up the LED node names, we'd probably want the following: >> >> diy_led: led-0 >> yellow_led: led-1 >> work_led: led-2 Change proposal for led nodes to comply with preexisting dts. Does this work? diy_led: led_0: led-0 yellow_led: led_1: led-1 work_led: led_2: led-2 blue: led_0: led-0 A check does not give any warnings. make -k ARCH=arm dtbs_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-gpio.yaml > > That doesn't look pretty either. > Would like to hear the maintainers view on how to handle other cases > without 'led' like for example 'blue' for mk808. >
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:12 PM Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > >> So for fixing up the LED node names, we'd probably want the following: > >> > >> diy_led: led-0 > >> yellow_led: led-1 > >> work_led: led-2 > > Change proposal for led nodes to comply with preexisting dts. > Does this work? > > diy_led: led_0: led-0 > yellow_led: led_1: led-1 > work_led: led_2: led-2 > > > blue: led_0: led-0 > > A check does not give any warnings. > > make -k ARCH=arm dtbs_check > DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-gpio.yaml IMO the led_N labels are kind of useless... they don't convey the information needed to identify the device. A reader seeing &led_0 { linux,default_triggger = "activity"; }; in some device tree (overlay) has no idea what this snippet is supposed to do. The person has to go back to the base dts / dtsi file to figure that out. But seriously, you should start a separate thread to discuss this issue. ChenYu > > > > That doesn't look pretty either. > > Would like to hear the maintainers view on how to handle other cases > > without 'led' like for example 'blue' for mk808. > >
On 2020-04-27 3:12 pm, Johan Jonker wrote: > Hi, > >>> So for fixing up the LED node names, we'd probably want the following: >>> >>> diy_led: led-0 >>> yellow_led: led-1 >>> work_led: led-2 > > Change proposal for led nodes to comply with preexisting dts. > Does this work? > > diy_led: led_0: led-0 > yellow_led: led_1: led-1 > work_led: led_2: led-2 Yuck, why? Labels are simply human-readable source annotations for the sake of referencing nodes more easily. Meaningful label names - that correlate to SoC or board components, schematic names, or physical labels on the board/device - make the DT sources easier to read, review, and maintain. There are a handful of cases where one node might have multiple labels, e.g. if two logical supply nets come from the same regulator on certain board variants, but there is zero point in defining redundant labels that just meaninglessly echo the DT's own structure. > blue: led_0: led-0 > > A check does not give any warnings. I should hope not. Labels are there to be consumed by DT compilers (and whatever symbolic overlay handlers count as... DT linkers, maybe?) - they have no business being within the scope of the bindings that define a contract for system software consuming the final DTB. Robin. > make -k ARCH=arm dtbs_check > DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-gpio.yaml > >> >> That doesn't look pretty either. >> Would like to hear the maintainers view on how to handle other cases >> without 'led' like for example 'blue' for mk808. >> > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-rockchip mailing list > Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip >
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts index 2acb3d500fb9..f0686fc276be 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dts @@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ vcc3v3_pcie: vcc3v3-pcie { }; }; +&diy_led { + linux,default-trigger = "mmc2"; +}; + &pcie_phy { status = "okay"; }; @@ -91,3 +95,7 @@ &uart0 { pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_xfer &uart0_cts &uart0_rts>; status = "okay"; }; + +&yellow_led { + linux,default-trigger = "mmc1"; +}; diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi index 9f225e9c3d54..bc060ac7972d 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi @@ -70,14 +70,14 @@ work-led { linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat"; }; - diy-led { + diy_led: diy-led { label = "red:diy"; gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; default-state = "off"; linux,default-trigger = "mmc1"; }; - yellow-led { + yellow_led: yellow-led { label = "yellow:yellow-led"; gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; default-state = "off";