Message ID | 20200428090956.GR487496@lahna.fi.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [GIT,PULL] Thunderbolt/USB4 fix for v5.7-rc4 | expand |
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:09:56PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > Hi Greg, > > The following changes since commit ae83d0b416db002fe95601e7f97f64b59514d936: > > Linux 5.7-rc2 (2020-04-19 14:35:30 -0700) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/westeri/thunderbolt.git tags/thunderbolt-fix-for-v5.7-rc4 > > for you to fetch changes up to 9d2214b14103594efdbf33018b893b9417846d42: > > thunderbolt: Check return value of tb_sw_read() in usb4_switch_op() (2020-04-20 11:54:19 +0300) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > thunderbolt: Fix for v5.7-rc4 > > - Fix checking return value of tb_sw_read() in usb4_switch_op(). > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Mika Westerberg (1): > thunderbolt: Check return value of tb_sw_read() in usb4_switch_op() Why does this commit not have a cc: stable tag on it? I can apply it by hand and add it, but that will not show up as a pull request/merge, is that ok? thanks, greg k-h
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:50:18PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:09:56PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > The following changes since commit ae83d0b416db002fe95601e7f97f64b59514d936: > > > > Linux 5.7-rc2 (2020-04-19 14:35:30 -0700) > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/westeri/thunderbolt.git tags/thunderbolt-fix-for-v5.7-rc4 > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 9d2214b14103594efdbf33018b893b9417846d42: > > > > thunderbolt: Check return value of tb_sw_read() in usb4_switch_op() (2020-04-20 11:54:19 +0300) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > thunderbolt: Fix for v5.7-rc4 > > > > - Fix checking return value of tb_sw_read() in usb4_switch_op(). > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Mika Westerberg (1): > > thunderbolt: Check return value of tb_sw_read() in usb4_switch_op() > > Why does this commit not have a cc: stable tag on it? I can apply it by > hand and add it, but that will not show up as a pull request/merge, is > that ok? I'm not sure this qualifies as stable material to be honest. Changes that this triggers is really low because there are no USB4 devices available for public at the moment (that's the reason I did not add the tag). If you still think it should have stable tag, then it would be great if you could add it. It is fine if it goes in as a patch not a merge. Thanks!
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 02:58:15PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:50:18PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:09:56PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > The following changes since commit ae83d0b416db002fe95601e7f97f64b59514d936: > > > > > > Linux 5.7-rc2 (2020-04-19 14:35:30 -0700) > > > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/westeri/thunderbolt.git tags/thunderbolt-fix-for-v5.7-rc4 > > > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 9d2214b14103594efdbf33018b893b9417846d42: > > > > > > thunderbolt: Check return value of tb_sw_read() in usb4_switch_op() (2020-04-20 11:54:19 +0300) > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > thunderbolt: Fix for v5.7-rc4 > > > > > > - Fix checking return value of tb_sw_read() in usb4_switch_op(). > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Mika Westerberg (1): > > > thunderbolt: Check return value of tb_sw_read() in usb4_switch_op() > > > > Why does this commit not have a cc: stable tag on it? I can apply it by > > hand and add it, but that will not show up as a pull request/merge, is > > that ok? > > I'm not sure this qualifies as stable material to be honest. Changes > that this triggers is really low because there are no USB4 devices > available for public at the moment (that's the reason I did not add the > tag). > > If you still think it should have stable tag, then it would be great if > you could add it. It is fine if it goes in as a patch not a merge. I'll add it and queue it up now, thanks. greg k-h
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 07:01:31PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 02:58:15PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:50:18PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:09:56PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > > > The following changes since commit ae83d0b416db002fe95601e7f97f64b59514d936: > > > > > > > > Linux 5.7-rc2 (2020-04-19 14:35:30 -0700) > > > > > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/westeri/thunderbolt.git tags/thunderbolt-fix-for-v5.7-rc4 > > > > > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 9d2214b14103594efdbf33018b893b9417846d42: > > > > > > > > thunderbolt: Check return value of tb_sw_read() in usb4_switch_op() (2020-04-20 11:54:19 +0300) > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > thunderbolt: Fix for v5.7-rc4 > > > > > > > > - Fix checking return value of tb_sw_read() in usb4_switch_op(). > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Mika Westerberg (1): > > > > thunderbolt: Check return value of tb_sw_read() in usb4_switch_op() > > > > > > Why does this commit not have a cc: stable tag on it? I can apply it by > > > hand and add it, but that will not show up as a pull request/merge, is > > > that ok? > > > > I'm not sure this qualifies as stable material to be honest. Changes > > that this triggers is really low because there are no USB4 devices > > available for public at the moment (that's the reason I did not add the > > tag). > > > > If you still think it should have stable tag, then it would be great if > > you could add it. It is fine if it goes in as a patch not a merge. > > I'll add it and queue it up now, thanks. Thanks Greg!