Message ID | 20200625141015.31719-7-Quirin.Gylstorff@siemens.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
Series | secureboot with efibootguard | expand |
On 25.06.20 16:10, Q. Gylstorff wrote: > From: Quirin Gylstorff <quirin.gylstorff@siemens.com> > > Signed-off-by: Quirin Gylstorff <quirin.gylstorff@siemens.com> > --- > recipes-core/swupdate/files/swupdate_handlers.lua | 8 ++++++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/recipes-core/swupdate/files/swupdate_handlers.lua b/recipes-core/swupdate/files/swupdate_handlers.lua > index c9b9962..f2ecc54 100644 > --- a/recipes-core/swupdate/files/swupdate_handlers.lua > +++ b/recipes-core/swupdate/files/swupdate_handlers.lua > @@ -311,8 +311,12 @@ function handler_roundrobin(image) > if rootparam and rootdevice then break end > end > if not rootdevice then > - swupdate.error("Cannot determine current root device.") > - return 1 > + -- Use findmnt to get the rootdev > + rootdevice = io.popen('findmnt -nl / -o PARTUUID'):read("*l") > + if not rootdevice then > + swupdate.error("Cannot determine current root device.") > + return 1 > + end > end > swupdate.info(string.format("Current root device is: %s", rootdevice)) > > Seems not really specific to secure-boot, rather related to the initramfs-based rootfs selection. But is that one actually using PARTUUID in the end? Or rather device paths? Anyway, I'm not against merging this. It should just be correctly labeled. Or maybe even merged into the swupdate patch from the first series. Jan
On 6/29/20 10:14 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 25.06.20 16:10, Q. Gylstorff wrote: >> From: Quirin Gylstorff <quirin.gylstorff@siemens.com> >> >> Signed-off-by: Quirin Gylstorff <quirin.gylstorff@siemens.com> >> --- >> recipes-core/swupdate/files/swupdate_handlers.lua | 8 ++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/recipes-core/swupdate/files/swupdate_handlers.lua >> b/recipes-core/swupdate/files/swupdate_handlers.lua >> index c9b9962..f2ecc54 100644 >> --- a/recipes-core/swupdate/files/swupdate_handlers.lua >> +++ b/recipes-core/swupdate/files/swupdate_handlers.lua >> @@ -311,8 +311,12 @@ function handler_roundrobin(image) >> if rootparam and rootdevice then break end >> end >> if not rootdevice then >> - swupdate.error("Cannot determine current root device.") >> - return 1 >> + -- Use findmnt to get the rootdev >> + rootdevice = io.popen('findmnt -nl / -o PARTUUID'):read("*l") >> + if not rootdevice then >> + swupdate.error("Cannot determine current root device.") >> + return 1 >> + end >> end >> swupdate.info(string.format("Current root device is: %s", >> rootdevice)) >> > > Seems not really specific to secure-boot, rather related to the > initramfs-based rootfs selection. But is that one actually using > PARTUUID in the end? Or rather device paths? it uses the partuuid from root. If someone finds a better way to get the current root without parsing the kernel commandline I would use that. > > Anyway, I'm not against merging this. It should just be correctly > labeled. Or maybe even merged into the swupdate patch from the first > series. I move the patch to the a/b update patch. > > Jan >
diff --git a/recipes-core/swupdate/files/swupdate_handlers.lua b/recipes-core/swupdate/files/swupdate_handlers.lua index c9b9962..f2ecc54 100644 --- a/recipes-core/swupdate/files/swupdate_handlers.lua +++ b/recipes-core/swupdate/files/swupdate_handlers.lua @@ -311,8 +311,12 @@ function handler_roundrobin(image) if rootparam and rootdevice then break end end if not rootdevice then - swupdate.error("Cannot determine current root device.") - return 1 + -- Use findmnt to get the rootdev + rootdevice = io.popen('findmnt -nl / -o PARTUUID'):read("*l") + if not rootdevice then + swupdate.error("Cannot determine current root device.") + return 1 + end end swupdate.info(string.format("Current root device is: %s", rootdevice))