mbox series

[00/28] Clean-up ASoC's W=1 build warnings

Message ID 20200707101642.1747944-1-lee.jones@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series Clean-up ASoC's W=1 build warnings | expand

Message

Lee Jones July 7, 2020, 10:16 a.m. UTC
This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1
kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with
niggly little warnings.

After these patches are applied, the build system no longer
complains about any W=0 nor W=1 level warnings in sound/soc.

Hurrah!

Lee Jones (28):
  ASoC: atmel: atmel-pcm-dma: Demote function header which is clearly
    not kerneldoc
  ASoC: atmel: atmel_ssc_dai: Demote function header which is clearly
    not kerneldoc
  ASoC: fsl: fsl-asoc-card: Use correct format when providing struct
    documentation
  ASoC: fsl: fsl_asrc: Demote obvious misuse of kerneldoc to standard
    comment blocks
  ASoC: fsl: fsl_ssi: Demote obvious misuse of kerneldoc to standard
    comment blocks
  ASoC: fsl: fsl_ssi_dbg: Demote obvious misuse of kerneldoc to standard
    comment blocks
  ASoC: fsl: fsl_spdif: Use correct formatting when denoting struct
    documentation
  ASoC: fsl: fsl_spdif: Update 'struct fsl_spdif_priv's descriptions
  ASoC: fsl: fsl_esai: Fix a bunch of kerneldoc issues
  ASoC: fsl: fsl_esai: Add descriptions for 'tx_mask' and 'rx_mask' to
    'fsl_esai'
  ASoC: pxa: pxa-ssp: Demote seemingly unintentional kerneldoc header
  ASoC: codecs: ak4458: Remove set but never checked variable 'ret'
  ASoC: qcom: qdsp6: q6asm: Provide documentation for WMA
    'codec_profile'
  ASoC: samsung: pcm: Demote half-documented kerneldoc header
  ASoC: samsung: spdif: Fix 3 misspelled struct properties
  ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-i2s: Demote half-documented kerneldoc header
  ASoC: uniphier: aio-core: Fix incorrectly named struct property and
    remove another
  ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-spdif: Fix misspelling of 'reg_dac_txdata'
  ASoC: ux500: ux500_msp_i2s: Remove unused variables 'reg_val_DR' and
    'reg_val_TSTDR'
  ASoC: sti: uniperif: Mark 'uni_tdm_hw' as __maybe_unused
  ASoC: ti: omap-mcbsp-st: Remove set, but unused variable 'w'
  ASoC: codecs: da7210: Fix formatting issues in da7210_set_dai_pll()
    header
  ASoC: soc-ac97: Demote seemingly unintentional kerneldoc header
  ASoC: codecs: jz4770: Remove defined but never used variable
    'mic_boost_tlv'
  ASoC: codecs: rt5631: Demote misuse of kerneldoc to standard comment
    blocks
  ASoC: codecs: rt5659: Remove many unused const variables
  ASoC: codecs: tlv320aic26: Demote seemingly unintentional kerneldoc
    header
  ASoC: codecs: wm8400: Remove a bunch of unused variables

 sound/soc/atmel/atmel-pcm-dma.c |  2 +-
 sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c |  2 +-
 sound/soc/codecs/ak4458.c       |  6 +++---
 sound/soc/codecs/da7210.c       | 12 ++++++-----
 sound/soc/codecs/jz4770.c       |  1 -
 sound/soc/codecs/rt5631.c       | 12 +++++------
 sound/soc/codecs/rt5659.c       | 37 ---------------------------------
 sound/soc/codecs/tlv320aic26.c  |  2 +-
 sound/soc/codecs/wm8400.c       | 12 -----------
 sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c   | 16 +++++++-------
 sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c        | 28 ++++++++++++-------------
 sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c        | 19 ++++++++++-------
 sound/soc/fsl/fsl_spdif.c       |  5 +++--
 sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c         | 28 ++++++++++++-------------
 sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi_dbg.c     |  4 ++--
 sound/soc/pxa/pxa-ssp.c         |  2 +-
 sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6asm.c    |  1 +
 sound/soc/samsung/pcm.c         |  2 +-
 sound/soc/samsung/spdif.c       |  6 +++---
 sound/soc/soc-ac97.c            |  2 +-
 sound/soc/sti/uniperif.h        |  2 +-
 sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c     |  2 +-
 sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-spdif.c   |  2 +-
 sound/soc/ti/omap-mcbsp-st.c    |  3 +--
 sound/soc/uniphier/aio-core.c   |  7 +++----
 sound/soc/ux500/ux500_msp_i2s.c |  8 +++----
 26 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 134 deletions(-)

Comments

Mark Brown July 7, 2020, 10:19 a.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 11:16:14AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1
> kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with
> niggly little warnings.

Please coordinate with Pierre (CCed) who is also submitting patches for
this issue, there's a whole bunch in flight already.
Lee Jones July 7, 2020, 10:37 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, 07 Jul 2020, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 11:16:14AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1
> > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with
> > niggly little warnings.
> 
> Please coordinate with Pierre (CCed) who is also submitting patches for
> this issue, there's a whole bunch in flight already.

Well that's frustrating.

Some of these issues have been present for years.  It's quite the
coincidence that we both submitted these this week!
Mark Brown July 7, 2020, 10:40 a.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 11:37:35AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:

> Some of these issues have been present for years.  It's quite the
> coincidence that we both submitted these this week!

I'm guessing you've both been inspired by the 0day bot turning W=1
warnings on without having first done a cleanup run :/
Pierre-Louis Bossart July 7, 2020, 3:44 p.m. UTC | #4
On 7/7/20 5:40 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 11:37:35AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> 
>> Some of these issues have been present for years.  It's quite the
>> coincidence that we both submitted these this week!
> 
> I'm guessing you've both been inspired by the 0day bot turning W=1
> warnings on without having first done a cleanup run :/

Yep, I was tired of seeing my email polluted with trivial problems last 
week, as well as seeing dead code that reviewers miss but tools don't.

Lee, do you mind if I merge your v2 series and my own v2, and then 
resubmit what hasn't been merged by Mark?
Lee Jones July 7, 2020, 7:04 p.m. UTC | #5
On Tue, 7 Jul 2020, 16:44 Pierre-Louis Bossart, <
pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 7/7/20 5:40 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 11:37:35AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> >> Some of these issues have been present for years.  It's quite the
> >> coincidence that we both submitted these this week!
> >
> > I'm guessing you've both been inspired by the 0day bot turning W=1
> > warnings on without having first done a cleanup run :/
>
> Yep, I was tired of seeing my email polluted with trivial problems last
> week, as well as seeing dead code that reviewers miss but tools don't.
>
> Lee, do you mind if I merge your v2 series and my own v2, and then
> resubmit what hasn't been merged by Mark?
>

Go for it.

>