Message ID | 1592818308-23001-4-git-send-email-mkshah@codeaurora.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | irqchip: qcom: pdc: Introduce irq_set_wake call | expand |
Hi, On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 2:32 AM Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org> wrote: > > msmgpio irqchip is not using return value of irq_set_wake call. > Start using it. > > Fixes: e35a6ae0eb3a ("pinctrl/msm: Setup GPIO chip in hierarchy") > Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org> > --- > drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c | 8 +++----- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Seems right to me. Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:32 AM Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org> wrote: > msmgpio irqchip is not using return value of irq_set_wake call. > Start using it. > > Fixes: e35a6ae0eb3a ("pinctrl/msm: Setup GPIO chip in hierarchy") > Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org> Is this something that's causing regressions so I should apply it for fixes, or is it fine to keep this with the rest of the series for v5.9? Yours, Linus Walleij
Hi, On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 6:19 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:32 AM Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org> wrote: > > > msmgpio irqchip is not using return value of irq_set_wake call. > > Start using it. > > > > Fixes: e35a6ae0eb3a ("pinctrl/msm: Setup GPIO chip in hierarchy") > > Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org> > > Is this something that's causing regressions so I should apply it for > fixes, or is it fine to keep this with the rest of the series for v5.9? I would let Maulik comment more, but as far as I can tell the function has been ignoring the return value of irq_set_irq_wake() for much longer. Presumably one could logically say: Fixes: 6aced33f4974 ("pinctrl: msm: drop wake_irqs bitmap") ...though when you get past the commit that Maulik tagged you need a backport rather than a straight cherry-pick. That would make me believe that there is no real hurry to land the fix here. -Doug
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c index b909ffe..92fe7d6 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c @@ -978,12 +978,10 @@ static int msm_gpio_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on) * when TLMM is powered on. To allow that, enable the GPIO * summary line to be wakeup capable at GIC. */ - if (d->parent_data) - irq_chip_set_wake_parent(d, on); - - irq_set_irq_wake(pctrl->irq, on); + if (d->parent_data && test_bit(d->hwirq, pctrl->skip_wake_irqs)) + return irq_chip_set_wake_parent(d, on); - return 0; + return irq_set_irq_wake(pctrl->irq, on); } static int msm_gpio_irq_reqres(struct irq_data *d)
msmgpio irqchip is not using return value of irq_set_wake call. Start using it. Fixes: e35a6ae0eb3a ("pinctrl/msm: Setup GPIO chip in hierarchy") Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org> --- drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)