Message ID | 20200710094544.430258-1-daniel@0x0f.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Initial MStar/Sigmastar ARMv7 SoC support | expand |
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 11:46 AM Daniel Palmer <daniel@0x0f.com> wrote: > > This patch set adds initial support for MStar/Sigmastar's > Armv7 based SoCs. There is just enough here to get to a shell > with an initramfs but support for a lot of the hardware is > in progress and will follow. > > MStar also shipped chips with MIPS cores and ARM9 etc which > are incompatible so I've tried to make the distinction in the > code that this is strictly for the Armv7 based chips. > > Sorry for the spamming this. I just really want to make some > progress on this because I'm worried the other bits that are > needed for these SoCs (Really old AT91 support in macb and > the fotg210 usb host) will be lost or stop working in the meantime. > This already happened in u-boot. Hi Daniel, I just found the series again after looking through some backlog, and noticing I missed your submission from July 10. This looks all good to me now, so I've merged the series into the arm/newsoc branch that already contains added support for the keembay and sparx5 SoCs. If you require any changes to this, please send incremental patches against the soc tree, and submit it to soc@kernel.org so it makes it gets into patchwork. Arnd
Hi Arnd, Thanks. There is one small fix for the v5 set. One of the DTS file names got broken when I rebased on a different machine. I'll send a patch for that later today. Cheer, Daniel On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 23:37, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 11:46 AM Daniel Palmer <daniel@0x0f.com> wrote: > > > > This patch set adds initial support for MStar/Sigmastar's > > Armv7 based SoCs. There is just enough here to get to a shell > > with an initramfs but support for a lot of the hardware is > > in progress and will follow. > > > > MStar also shipped chips with MIPS cores and ARM9 etc which > > are incompatible so I've tried to make the distinction in the > > code that this is strictly for the Armv7 based chips. > > > > Sorry for the spamming this. I just really want to make some > > progress on this because I'm worried the other bits that are > > needed for these SoCs (Really old AT91 support in macb and > > the fotg210 usb host) will be lost or stop working in the meantime. > > This already happened in u-boot. > > Hi Daniel, > > I just found the series again after looking through some backlog, > and noticing I missed your submission from July 10. This looks > all good to me now, so I've merged the series into the arm/newsoc > branch that already contains added support for the keembay and > sparx5 SoCs. > > If you require any changes to this, please send incremental > patches against the soc tree, and submit it to soc@kernel.org > so it makes it gets into patchwork. > > Arnd