Message ID | 20200629124752.1018358-1-lee.jones@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <SRS0=SqQd=AK=lists.infradead.org=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@kernel.org> Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B70618 for <patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:49:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3992F23D22 for <patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:49:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="ABtn2aiR"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="MMrJypkt" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3992F23D22 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender :Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Owner; bh=v5di9KZqAD5dddvwXvZksAzSdcOhwPmVY4tlQddCvjo=; b=ABtn2aiRvgUGzAdAJZorconOK6 HU+qxUCjT9zzr9zzTVDEP1VHMK9x053148d53KTS5FYKFEjxxueXlPMcjF5zjPpPjJdbMW1lEfzly rPcqvZFoh8z9/zD5Y8sRQkj2QCgZkihyvDNl9mqB/mv3QXdHoVU9mA1DDA+tKxB/mKDAADDtrOP9U isFvL4vJSJtUIAfBMZheXk7aN0uekfo0e1H4GbQex3QPT0K7soY+HmseN495YmyuXUIYXSFvn00IB 3UJxjsbmXfPcSJhSUSvTjX8SF8mJg9zcB1AXOb49mqYBCw/NWirARkxI0Fu/a+nNktTvqP6dQ8iiJ ak/205Eg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jptCZ-0001hY-CK; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:47:59 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-x341.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::341]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jptCW-0001gc-9F for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:47:57 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-x341.google.com with SMTP id f18so15998105wml.3 for <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 05:47:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rudM74e1Pgb+dgRXbno543NZk9dhJh2T8QURDAwNqxo=; b=MMrJypktX2dGwbWK2WJwHSZlgTCxBvMicf8S6HeV+IEHyBd/BsMsD7DMpdBDI83MMv QyiPxbAJaQSWycHKbp7oaNquqzwC+4IpMBeTWunKJygLXDTtCouHG6kwzAS2WB0rfUvL 5sUUgJlP/7u5hxVJQ8kkalGly7nDzvinuu1S6Ow2rv0xN+jughtx7Ou23KzkI16t7Y9X ir8XBS6MkFgqtdbkxyPOsNQN/TqvwoD+BQGpXSohEbzVF7hCKT5WgnGh6cM9H9htgNKl UqFX7dMSyrL855EudgAl3ujqkL8MW+azJAKRg4/RN+dpJ51bk5lqXzd0ImdK4NFYM5cI F/Bg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rudM74e1Pgb+dgRXbno543NZk9dhJh2T8QURDAwNqxo=; b=bh3JCtcrx/l76wLlyMOwi0lPNtaZnsnr7HDH/FlZdBIS4V+G12lOhmcU0FNvxrTjiu aw9VG84g8WfaOYlgXkrg6qpZl8hJ2KiTz109vAYdtXbJT9V0y9EOJlJjxn8X5L7E2KSZ 4Z+5YhpT12F5QmoJuv6t02LPkGBfctrw/HT4j3SuQuVUi/al5gGBIcXQw56J+J0hoNCA vN1IUllRBbuMC6BgaGIR00IZqchUqLwYUQ+d0BhhdO0jyM0Hc2XUzL4Rj5kLpSgf0RFj Nkf1n5VLlJ3Lw9bmjenXKJLJ/5Pgk8Tl00ovCY7IhS34BiU9+2C9gcjm3fL4tm5nk16C CO+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530tkvpcr1pcK93yQm6hXpKgDemkMz25xsv58gXz/vTlJfDZEB9c FnGiS9vUk0yZt7MlLGKyjpCmQOvwNQ4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJymTdB7uYUnNxNAvBDg/jFPSHnhR3EKfJTDqrjBJtflMfvEKlNxtCKuRryFRR89Pu116D8EKw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:3142:: with SMTP id x63mr16024940wmx.62.1593434875113; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 05:47:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2.27.35.144]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e17sm12995924wrr.88.2020.06.29.05.47.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 05:47:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> To: thierry.reding@gmail.com, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/4] Fix a bunch of W=1 warnings in PWM Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 13:47:48 +0100 Message-Id: <20200629124752.1018358-1-lee.jones@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Note: CRM114 invocation failed X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-0.2 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:341 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: <linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-arm-kernel>, <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/> List-Post: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> List-Help: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel>, <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" <linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org> Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org |
Series |
Fix a bunch of W=1 warnings in PWM
|
expand
|
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 01:47:48PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > Attempting to clean-up W=1 kernel builds, which are currently > overwhelmingly riddled with niggly little warnings. > > Lee Jones (4): > pwm: bcm-iproc: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty > cycle > pwm: bcm-kona: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle > pwm: mediatek: Provide missing kerneldoc description for 'soc' arg > pwm: omap-dmtimer: Repair pwm_omap_dmtimer_chip's broken kerneldoc > header > > drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c | 3 +-- > drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c | 2 +- > drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c | 1 + > drivers/pwm/pwm-omap-dmtimer.c | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. Thierry