Message ID | 20200725120039.91071-1-colyli@suse.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | bcache patches for Linux v5.9 | expand |
On 7/25/20 6:00 AM, Coly Li wrote: > Hi Jens, > > This is the first wave bcache series for Linux v5.9. > > The most part of change is to add large_bucket size support to bcache, > which permits user to extend the bucket size from 16bit to 32bit width. > This is the initial state of large bucket feature, more improvement will > happen in future versions. > > Most of the patches from me are for the large_bucket feature, except for, > - The fix for stripe size overflow > bcache: avoid nr_stripes overflow in bcache_device_init() > bcache: fix overflow in offset_to_stripe() > - The fix to I/O account on wrong device > bcache: fix bio_{start,end}_io_acct with proper device > > Also we have Gustavo A. R. Silva to contribute 2 patches to cleanup > kzalloc() code by using struct_size(), Jean Delvare to contribute a > typo fix in bcache Kconfig file, and Xu Wang to contribute two code > cleanup patches. > > Please take them for your Linux v5.9 block drivers branch. Thanks, applied.
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 07:39:00AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Please take them for your Linux v5.9 block drivers branch. > > Thanks, applied. Can you please revert "cache: fix bio_{start,end}_io_acct with proper device" again? It really is a gross hack making things worse rather than better.
On 2020/7/28 20:14, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 07:39:00AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> Please take them for your Linux v5.9 block drivers branch. >> >> Thanks, applied. > > Can you please revert "cache: fix bio_{start,end}_io_acct with proper > device" again? It really is a gross hack making things worse rather > than better. > Hi Christoph and Jens, My plan was to submit another fix to current fix. If you plan to revert the original fix, it is OK to me, just generate the patch on different code base. Thanks. Coly Li
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 08:40:16PM +0800, Coly Li wrote: > On 2020/7/28 20:14, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 07:39:00AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > >>> Please take them for your Linux v5.9 block drivers branch. > >> > >> Thanks, applied. > > > > Can you please revert "cache: fix bio_{start,end}_io_acct with proper > > device" again? It really is a gross hack making things worse rather > > than better. > > > > Hi Christoph and Jens, > > My plan was to submit another fix to current fix. If you plan to revert > the original fix, it is OK to me, just generate the patch on different > code base. Let's get the fixup out ASAP then..
On 7/28/20 6:40 AM, Coly Li wrote: > On 2020/7/28 20:14, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 07:39:00AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >>>> Please take them for your Linux v5.9 block drivers branch. >>> >>> Thanks, applied. >> >> Can you please revert "cache: fix bio_{start,end}_io_acct with proper >> device" again? It really is a gross hack making things worse rather >> than better. >> > > Hi Christoph and Jens, > > My plan was to submit another fix to current fix. If you plan to revert > the original fix, it is OK to me, just generate the patch on different > code base. That's fine, just do an incremental so we avoid having a revert.