Message ID | 20200903100537.1337-1-paul@xen.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | fix 'xl block-detach' | expand |
Ping? Can I get a toolstack maintainer opinion on this? Thanks, Paul > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> > Sent: 03 September 2020 11:06 > To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > Cc: Paul Durrant <pdurrant@amazon.com> > Subject: [PATCH 0/2] fix 'xl block-detach' > > From: Paul Durrant <pdurrant@amazon.com> > > This series makes it behave as the documentation states it should > > Paul Durrant (2): > xl: implement documented --force option for block-detach > libxl: do not automatically force detach of block devices > > docs/man/xl.1.pod.in | 4 ++-- > tools/libxl/libxl_device.c | 9 ++++++--- > tools/xl/xl_block.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++----- > tools/xl/xl_cmdtable.c | 3 ++- > 4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.20.1
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 11:52:48AM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote:
> Ping? Can I get a toolstack maintainer opinion on this?
This series landed in my @xen.org inbox just fine but I haven't got
around reviewing it.
Wei.
From: Paul Durrant <pdurrant@amazon.com> This series makes it behave as the documentation states it should Paul Durrant (2): xl: implement documented --force option for block-detach libxl: do not automatically force detach of block devices docs/man/xl.1.pod.in | 4 ++-- tools/libxl/libxl_device.c | 9 ++++++--- tools/xl/xl_block.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++----- tools/xl/xl_cmdtable.c | 3 ++- 4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)