[0/5] USB Type-C fixes

Message

Heikki Krogerus Sept. 16, 2020, 8:16 a.m. UTC

Hi,

There are two fixes for the UCSI drivers that address issues related
to the alternate modes. The other three fixes are for the PMC mux
driver. We were missing dependency on ACPI and the port number that
was used with the IOM was incorrect.

Let me know if you want anything to be changed.

thanks,

Azhar Shaikh (1):
  usb: typec: intel_pmc_mux: Pass correct USB Type-C port number to SoC

Heikki Krogerus (3):
  usb: typec: ucsi: acpi: Increase command completion timeout value
  usb: typec: ucsi: Prevent mode overrun
  usb: typec: intel_pmc_mux: Add dependency on ACPI

Madhusudanarao Amara (1):
  usb: typec: intel_pmc_mux: Handle SCU IPC error conditions

 drivers/usb/typec/mux/Kconfig         |  1 +
 drivers/usb/typec/mux/intel_pmc_mux.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
 drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c         | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
 drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_acpi.c    |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Comments

Greg KH Sept. 16, 2020, 8:37 a.m. UTC | #1

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:16:12AM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> There are two fixes for the UCSI drivers that address issues related
> to the alternate modes. The other three fixes are for the PMC mux
> driver. We were missing dependency on ACPI and the port number that
> was used with the IOM was incorrect.
> 
> Let me know if you want anything to be changed.

This seems to be a mix of patches to be sent to Linus for 5.9-final and
some for 5.10-rc1, right?

Can you resend these as two series so I know which one is which?

thanks,

greg k-h

Heikki Krogerus Sept. 16, 2020, 8:42 a.m. UTC | #2

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:37:09AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:16:12AM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > There are two fixes for the UCSI drivers that address issues related
> > to the alternate modes. The other three fixes are for the PMC mux
> > driver. We were missing dependency on ACPI and the port number that
> > was used with the IOM was incorrect.
> > 
> > Let me know if you want anything to be changed.
> 
> This seems to be a mix of patches to be sent to Linus for 5.9-final and
> some for 5.10-rc1, right?
> 
> Can you resend these as two series so I know which one is which?

OK.