Message ID | 20200923173905.11219-1-kristen@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Function Granular KASLR | expand |
Hi Kristen, On Wed, 23 Sep 2020, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote: > Function Granular Kernel Address Space Layout Randomization (fgkaslr) > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This patch set is an implementation of finer grained kernel address space > randomization. It rearranges your kernel code at load time > on a per-function level granularity, with only around a second added to > boot time. I ran live patching kernel selftests on the patch set and everything passed fine. However, we also use not-yet-upstream set of tests at SUSE for testing live patching [1] and one of them, klp_tc_12.sh, is failing. You should be able to run the set on upstream as is. The test uninterruptedly sleeps in a kretprobed function called by a patched one. The current master without fgkaslr patch set reports the stack of the sleeping task as unreliable and live patching fails. The situation is different with fgkaslr (even with nofgkaslr on the command line). The stack is returned as reliable. It looks something like [<0>] __schedule+0x465/0xa40 [<0>] schedule+0x55/0xd0 [<0>] orig_do_sleep+0xb1/0x110 [klp_test_support_mod] [<0>] swap_pages+0x7f/0x7f where the last entry is not reliable. I've seen kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x4a and some other symbols there too. Since the patched function (orig_sleep_uninterruptible_set) is not on the stack, live patching succeeds, which is not intended. With kprobe setting removed, all works as expected. So I wonder if there is still some issue with ORC somewhere as you mentioned in v4 thread. I'll investigate more next week, but wanted to report early. Regards Miroslav [1] https://github.com/lpechacek/qa_test_klp
Hi, On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 15:06 +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote: > Hi Kristen, > > On Wed, 23 Sep 2020, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote: > > > Function Granular Kernel Address Space Layout Randomization > > (fgkaslr) > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > ---- > > > > This patch set is an implementation of finer grained kernel address > > space > > randomization. It rearranges your kernel code at load time > > on a per-function level granularity, with only around a second > > added to > > boot time. > > I ran live patching kernel selftests on the patch set and everything > passed fine. > > However, we also use not-yet-upstream set of tests at SUSE for > testing > live patching [1] and one of them, klp_tc_12.sh, is failing. You > should be > able to run the set on upstream as is. > > The test uninterruptedly sleeps in a kretprobed function called by a > patched one. The current master without fgkaslr patch set reports > the > stack of the sleeping task as unreliable and live patching fails. > The > situation is different with fgkaslr (even with nofgkaslr on the > command > line). The stack is returned as reliable. It looks something like > > [<0>] __schedule+0x465/0xa40 > [<0>] schedule+0x55/0xd0 > [<0>] orig_do_sleep+0xb1/0x110 [klp_test_support_mod] > [<0>] swap_pages+0x7f/0x7f > > where the last entry is not reliable. I've seen > kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x4a and some other symbols there too. Since > the > patched function (orig_sleep_uninterruptible_set) is not on the > stack, > live patching succeeds, which is not intended. > > With kprobe setting removed, all works as expected. > > So I wonder if there is still some issue with ORC somewhere as you > mentioned in v4 thread. I'll investigate more next week, but wanted > to > report early. > > Regards > Miroslav > > [1] https://github.com/lpechacek/qa_test_klp Thanks for testing and reporting. I will grab your test and see what I can find.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 10:38:54AM -0700, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote: > This patch set is an implementation of finer grained kernel address space > randomization. It rearranges your kernel code at load time > on a per-function level granularity, with only around a second added to > boot time. > > Changes in v5: > -------------- > [...] Builds and boots; looks happy. Hopefully this can go into -tip after the coming v5.10 merge window, for v5.11? Thoughts? Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>