| Message ID | 20201005213852.233004-4-preichl@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | xfs: Remove wrappers for some semaphores | expand |
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 11:38:51PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote: > In its current form, xfs_isilocked() is only able to test one lock type > at a time - ilock, iolock, or mmap lock, but combinations are not > properly handled. The intent here is to check that both XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL > and XFS_ILOCK_EXCL are held, so test them each separately. > > The commit ecfea3f0c8c6 ("xfs: split xfs_bmap_shift_extents") ORed the > flags together which was an error, so this patch reverts that part of > the change and check the locks independently. > > Fixes: ecfea3f0c8c6 ("xfs: split xfs_bmap_shift_extents") > > Suggested-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com> Looks good, Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> --D > --- > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c > index ced3b996cd8a..ff5cc8a5d476 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c > @@ -5787,7 +5787,8 @@ xfs_bmap_collapse_extents( > if (XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp)) > return -EIO; > > - ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)); > + ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)); > + ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)); > > if (!(ifp->if_flags & XFS_IFEXTENTS)) { > error = xfs_iread_extents(tp, ip, whichfork); > @@ -5904,7 +5905,8 @@ xfs_bmap_insert_extents( > if (XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp)) > return -EIO; > > - ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)); > + ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)); > + ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)); > > if (!(ifp->if_flags & XFS_IFEXTENTS)) { > error = xfs_iread_extents(tp, ip, whichfork); > -- > 2.26.2 >
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c index ced3b996cd8a..ff5cc8a5d476 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c @@ -5787,7 +5787,8 @@ xfs_bmap_collapse_extents( if (XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp)) return -EIO; - ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)); + ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)); + ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)); if (!(ifp->if_flags & XFS_IFEXTENTS)) { error = xfs_iread_extents(tp, ip, whichfork); @@ -5904,7 +5905,8 @@ xfs_bmap_insert_extents( if (XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp)) return -EIO; - ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)); + ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)); + ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)); if (!(ifp->if_flags & XFS_IFEXTENTS)) { error = xfs_iread_extents(tp, ip, whichfork);
In its current form, xfs_isilocked() is only able to test one lock type at a time - ilock, iolock, or mmap lock, but combinations are not properly handled. The intent here is to check that both XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL and XFS_ILOCK_EXCL are held, so test them each separately. The commit ecfea3f0c8c6 ("xfs: split xfs_bmap_shift_extents") ORed the flags together which was an error, so this patch reverts that part of the change and check the locks independently. Fixes: ecfea3f0c8c6 ("xfs: split xfs_bmap_shift_extents") Suggested-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com> --- fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)