| Message ID | 20201005203451.9985-4-post@lespocky.de (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | leds: pwm: Make automatic labels work | expand |
Hi Alexander, On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 10:34:42PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote: > The node names for devices using the pwm-leds driver follow a certain > naming scheme (now). Parent node name is not enforced, but recommended > by DT project. > > DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml > CHECK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml > /home/alex/build/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'panel' does not match any of the regexes: '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' > From schema: /home/alex/src/linux/leds/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <post@lespocky.de> > --- > > Notes: > v6 -> v7: > * added warning message to commit message (Krzysztof Kozlowski) > > v6: > * added this patch to series > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml > index 541b06d80e73..92dc48a8dfa7 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml > @@ -90,10 +90,11 @@ examples: > }; > }; > > - pwmleds { > + led-controller { > compatible = "pwm-leds"; > > - panel { > + led-1 { > + label = "panel"; > pwms = <&iqs620a_pwm 0 1000000>; > max-brightness = <255>; > }; > -- > 2.20.1 > I like the consistency this brings. My only feedback is that in the other examples I found (common.yaml and leds-gpio.yaml), the children count off from 0 (e.g. led-0) instead of 1 as your series appears to. That's not a huge deal; it simply seems more consistent to count from the first index allowed by the regex (0). The patch is still fine, and so: Acked-by: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com> Kind regards, Jeff LaBundy
Hello Jeff, Am Dienstag, 6. Oktober 2020, 04:17:29 CEST schrieb Jeff LaBundy: > Hi Alexander, > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 10:34:42PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote: > > The node names for devices using the pwm-leds driver follow a certain > > naming scheme (now). Parent node name is not enforced, but recommended > > by DT project. > > > > DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml > > CHECK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml > > > > /home/alex/build/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.exampl > > e.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'panel' does not match any of the regexes: > > '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'> > > From schema: > > /home/alex/src/linux/leds/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ > > leds-pwm.yaml> > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <post@lespocky.de> > > --- > > > > Notes: > > v6 -> v7: > > * added warning message to commit message (Krzysztof Kozlowski) > > > > v6: > > * added this patch to series > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml | 5 +++-- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml index > > 541b06d80e73..92dc48a8dfa7 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml > > > > @@ -90,10 +90,11 @@ examples: > > }; > > > > }; > > > > - pwmleds { > > + led-controller { > > > > compatible = "pwm-leds"; > > > > - panel { > > + led-1 { > > + label = "panel"; > > > > pwms = <&iqs620a_pwm 0 1000000>; > > max-brightness = <255>; > > > > }; > > I like the consistency this brings. My only feedback is that in the other > examples I found (common.yaml and leds-gpio.yaml), the children count off > from 0 (e.g. led-0) instead of 1 as your series appears to. You're right. And that's also the same in leds-lp50xx.yaml and … well I did not look close enough, maybe the numbering scheme on the PCB on my desk confused me. Okay, we are already talking about starting index. What about the parent node's "led-controller" then in case there are more than one? IIRC Rob acknowledged starting from 1 like "led-controller-1", "led-controller-2" and so on. > That's not a huge deal; it simply seems more consistent to count from the > first index allowed by the regex (0). The patch is still fine, and so: > > Acked-by: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com> Thanks. I'm not sure how many more iterations of this series we will need, at least one for the binding license acks I guess, so I could also adapt the child node indexes in schema and actual dts files in v8 or so. Greets Alex
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 08:34:23AM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote: > Hello Jeff, > > Am Dienstag, 6. Oktober 2020, 04:17:29 CEST schrieb Jeff LaBundy: > > Hi Alexander, > > > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 10:34:42PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote: > > > The node names for devices using the pwm-leds driver follow a certain > > > naming scheme (now). Parent node name is not enforced, but recommended > > > by DT project. > > > > > > DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml > > > CHECK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml > > > > > > /home/alex/build/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.exampl > > > e.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'panel' does not match any of the regexes: > > > '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'> > > > From schema: > > > /home/alex/src/linux/leds/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ > > > leds-pwm.yaml> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <post@lespocky.de> > > > --- > > > > > > Notes: > > > v6 -> v7: > > > * added warning message to commit message (Krzysztof Kozlowski) > > > > > > v6: > > > * added this patch to series > > > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml | 5 +++-- > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml index > > > 541b06d80e73..92dc48a8dfa7 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml > > > > > > @@ -90,10 +90,11 @@ examples: > > > }; > > > > > > }; > > > > > > - pwmleds { > > > + led-controller { > > > > > > compatible = "pwm-leds"; > > > > > > - panel { > > > + led-1 { > > > + label = "panel"; > > > > > > pwms = <&iqs620a_pwm 0 1000000>; > > > max-brightness = <255>; > > > > > > }; > > > > I like the consistency this brings. My only feedback is that in the other > > examples I found (common.yaml and leds-gpio.yaml), the children count off > > from 0 (e.g. led-0) instead of 1 as your series appears to. > > You're right. And that's also the same in leds-lp50xx.yaml and … well I did > not look close enough, maybe the numbering scheme on the PCB on my desk > confused me. If you can tie the numbering to the PCB, then do that. > Okay, we are already talking about starting index. What about the parent > node's "led-controller" then in case there are more than one? IIRC Rob > acknowledged starting from 1 like "led-controller-1", "led-controller-2" and > so on. No, I'd assume we start at 0. > > That's not a huge deal; it simply seems more consistent to count from the > > first index allowed by the regex (0). The patch is still fine, and so: > > > > Acked-by: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com> > > Thanks. > > I'm not sure how many more iterations of this series we will need, at least > one for the binding license acks I guess, so I could also adapt the child node > indexes in schema and actual dts files in v8 or so. > > Greets > Alex > > >
On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 22:34:42 +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote: > The node names for devices using the pwm-leds driver follow a certain > naming scheme (now). Parent node name is not enforced, but recommended > by DT project. > > DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml > CHECK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml > /home/alex/build/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'panel' does not match any of the regexes: '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' > From schema: /home/alex/src/linux/leds/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <post@lespocky.de> > --- > > Notes: > v6 -> v7: > * added warning message to commit message (Krzysztof Kozlowski) > > v6: > * added this patch to series > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Hi! > The node names for devices using the pwm-leds driver follow a certain > naming scheme (now). Parent node name is not enforced, but recommended > by DT project. > > DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml > CHECK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml > /home/alex/build/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'panel' does not match any of the regexes: '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' > From schema: /home/alex/src/linux/leds/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <post@lespocky.de> Okay, so I need Rob's ack here, I guess... and rest of the series is not really for my tree. Best regards, Pavel
Hei Pavel, Am Mittwoch, 7. Oktober 2020, 12:03:59 CEST schrieb Pavel Machek: > > The node names for devices using the pwm-leds driver follow a certain > > naming scheme (now). Parent node name is not enforced, but recommended > > by DT project. > > > > DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml > > CHECK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml > > > > /home/alex/build/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.exampl > > e.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'panel' does not match any of the regexes: > > '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'> > > From schema: > > /home/alex/src/linux/leds/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/ > > leds-pwm.yaml> > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <post@lespocky.de> > > Okay, so I need Rob's ack here, I guess... and rest of the series is > not really for my tree. I think so, too. I saw you applied patch number 1, all the other patches are DT and from my side those can wait for the Acks required and maybe I change the indexes again and I'm fine resending all that after the 5.10 merge window. Thanks for applying the non-DT patches for leds subsystem, the rest will be sorted out without hurry. Greets Alex
On Wed, 07 Oct 2020, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > The node names for devices using the pwm-leds driver follow a certain > > naming scheme (now). Parent node name is not enforced, but recommended > > by DT project. > > > > DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml > > CHECK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml > > /home/alex/build/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'panel' does not match any of the regexes: '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' > > From schema: /home/alex/src/linux/leds/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <post@lespocky.de> > > Okay, so I need Rob's ack here, I guess... and rest of the series is > not really for my tree. This patch is not for your tree either. ;)
Hi! > > > The node names for devices using the pwm-leds driver follow a certain > > > naming scheme (now). Parent node name is not enforced, but recommended > > > by DT project. > > > > > > DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml > > > CHECK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml > > > /home/alex/build/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'panel' does not match any of the regexes: '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' > > > From schema: /home/alex/src/linux/leds/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <post@lespocky.de> > > > > Okay, so I need Rob's ack here, I guess... and rest of the series is > > not really for my tree. > > This patch is not for your tree either. ;) Ah, right. Usually we have one patch series for one maintainer... Best regards, Pavel
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml index 541b06d80e73..92dc48a8dfa7 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml @@ -90,10 +90,11 @@ examples: }; }; - pwmleds { + led-controller { compatible = "pwm-leds"; - panel { + led-1 { + label = "panel"; pwms = <&iqs620a_pwm 0 1000000>; max-brightness = <255>; };
The node names for devices using the pwm-leds driver follow a certain naming scheme (now). Parent node name is not enforced, but recommended by DT project. DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml CHECK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml /home/alex/build/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'panel' does not match any of the regexes: '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' From schema: /home/alex/src/linux/leds/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <post@lespocky.de> --- Notes: v6 -> v7: * added warning message to commit message (Krzysztof Kozlowski) v6: * added this patch to series Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)