Message ID | 20201008214022.2044402-1-mkl@pengutronix.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show |
Series | pull-request: can 2020-10-08 | expand |
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 23:40:19 +0200 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > The first patch is part of my pull request "linux-can-fixes-for-5.9-20201006", > so consider that one obsolete and take this instead. > > The first patch is by Lucas Stach and fixes m_can driver by removing an > erroneous call to m_can_class_suspend() in runtime suspend. Which causes the > pinctrl state to get stuck on the "sleep" state, which breaks all CAN > functionality on SoCs where this state is defined. > > The last two patches target the j1939 protocol: Cong Wang fixes a syzbot > finding of an uninitialized variable in the j1939 transport protocol. I > contribute a patch, that fixes the initialization of a same uninitialized > variable in a different function. Pulled, thanks! Since we missed 5.9 would you like me to queue these up for stable?
On 10/10/20 7:32 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 23:40:19 +0200 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> The first patch is part of my pull request "linux-can-fixes-for-5.9-20201006", >> so consider that one obsolete and take this instead. >> >> The first patch is by Lucas Stach and fixes m_can driver by removing an >> erroneous call to m_can_class_suspend() in runtime suspend. Which causes the >> pinctrl state to get stuck on the "sleep" state, which breaks all CAN >> functionality on SoCs where this state is defined. >> >> The last two patches target the j1939 protocol: Cong Wang fixes a syzbot >> finding of an uninitialized variable in the j1939 transport protocol. I >> contribute a patch, that fixes the initialization of a same uninitialized >> variable in a different function. > > Pulled, thanks! > > Since we missed 5.9 would you like me to queue these up for stable? Yes. tnx, Marc