Message ID | 20201013160845.1772-4-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | fix all errors except one reported by dt_binding_check | expand |
On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 00:08:42 +0800, Zhen Lei wrote: > scripts/dtc/checks.c: > if (get_property(node, "spi-slave")) > spi_addr_cells = 0; > if (node_addr_cells(node) != spi_addr_cells) > FAIL(c, dti, node, "incorrect #address-cells for SPI bus"); > if (node_size_cells(node) != 0) > FAIL(c, dti, node, "incorrect #size-cells for SPI bus"); > > The above code in check_spi_bus_bridge() require that the number of address > cells must be 0. So we should explicitly declare "#address-cells = <0>". > > Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-controller.yaml | 20 ++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > Applied, thanks! Note that I tried fixing this in dtc, but that was rejected. So this gets the schema in sync with dtc. Rob
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-controller.yaml index 2b154803b181c8b..1b56d5e40f1fcde 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-controller.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-controller.yaml @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ properties: pattern: "^spi(@.*|-[0-9a-f])*$" "#address-cells": - const: 1 + enum: [0, 1] "#size-cells": const: 0 @@ -52,11 +52,19 @@ properties: description: The SPI controller acts as a slave, instead of a master. -oneOf: - - required: - - "#address-cells" - - required: - - spi-slave +allOf: + - if: + not: + required: + - spi-slave + then: + properties: + "#address-cells": + const: 1 + else: + properties: + "#address-cells": + const: 0 patternProperties: "^slave$":
scripts/dtc/checks.c: if (get_property(node, "spi-slave")) spi_addr_cells = 0; if (node_addr_cells(node) != spi_addr_cells) FAIL(c, dti, node, "incorrect #address-cells for SPI bus"); if (node_size_cells(node) != 0) FAIL(c, dti, node, "incorrect #size-cells for SPI bus"); The above code in check_spi_bus_bridge() require that the number of address cells must be 0. So we should explicitly declare "#address-cells = <0>". Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> --- .../devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-controller.yaml | 20 ++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)