mbox series

[v5,00/13] bus/fsl-mc: Extend mc-bus driver functionalities in preparation for mc-bus VFIO support

Message ID 20200929085441.17448-1-diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series bus/fsl-mc: Extend mc-bus driver functionalities in preparation for mc-bus VFIO support | expand

Message

Diana Madalina Craciun Sept. 29, 2020, 8:54 a.m. UTC
The vfio-mc bus driver needs some additional services to be exported by the
mc-bus driver like:
- a way to reset the DPRC container
- driver_override support
- functions to setup/tear down a DPRC
- functions for allocating the pool of interrupts. In case of VFIO the
interrupts are not configured at probe time, but later by userspace
request

v4 -> v5
- dprc_celanup should not fail

v3 -> v4
- Rebased on the latest kernel.
- Exported a dprc_remove function

v2 -> v3
- Add a new version for dprc_get_obj_region
- Export the cacheability bus specific bits defines

v1 -> v2
- Remove driver_override propagation through various functions
- Cache the DPRC API version

The patches are related with "vfio/fsl-mc: VFIO support for FSL-MC
devices" patches, but the series were split because they are targeting
different subsystems. However, the mc-bus patches may suffer changes
when addressing the VFIO review comments.

The patches do not address the comment regarding moving driver_override
in the core code. I prefer not to tie these patches on that change and
address that separately.

Bharat Bhushan (3):
  bus/fsl-mc: add support for 'driver_override' in the mc-bus
  bus/fsl-mc: Add dprc-reset-container support
  bus/fsl-mc: Extend ICID size from 16bit to 32bit

Diana Craciun (10):
  bus/fsl-mc: Do no longer export the total number of irqs outside
    dprc_scan_objects
  bus/fsl-mc: Add a new parameter to dprc_scan_objects function
  bus/fsl-mc: Set the QMAN/BMAN region flags
  bus/fsl-mc: Cache the DPRC API version
  bus/fsl-mc: Export dprc_scan/dprc_remove functions to be used by
    multiple entities
  bus/fsl-mc: Export a cleanup function for DPRC
  bus/fsl-mc: Add a container setup function
  bus/fsl_mc: Do not rely on caller to provide non NULL mc_io
  bus/fsl-mc: Export IRQ pool handling functions to be used by VFIO
  bus/fsl-mc: Add a new version for dprc_get_obj_region command

 drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc-driver.c      | 190 ++++++++++++++++----------
 drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc.c             | 141 +++++++++++++++----
 drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-allocator.c |  12 +-
 drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c       |  64 ++++++++-
 drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-private.h   |  31 ++---
 drivers/bus/fsl-mc/mc-io.c            |   7 +-
 include/linux/fsl/mc.h                |  41 +++++-
 7 files changed, 359 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)

Comments

Laurentiu Tudor Sept. 29, 2020, 11:06 a.m. UTC | #1
On 9/29/2020 11:54 AM, Diana Craciun wrote:
> The vfio-mc bus driver needs some additional services to be exported by the
> mc-bus driver like:
> - a way to reset the DPRC container
> - driver_override support
> - functions to setup/tear down a DPRC
> - functions for allocating the pool of interrupts. In case of VFIO the
> interrupts are not configured at probe time, but later by userspace
> request
> 
> v4 -> v5
> - dprc_celanup should not fail
> 
> v3 -> v4
> - Rebased on the latest kernel.
> - Exported a dprc_remove function
> 
> v2 -> v3
> - Add a new version for dprc_get_obj_region
> - Export the cacheability bus specific bits defines
> 
> v1 -> v2
> - Remove driver_override propagation through various functions
> - Cache the DPRC API version
> 
> The patches are related with "vfio/fsl-mc: VFIO support for FSL-MC
> devices" patches, but the series were split because they are targeting
> different subsystems. However, the mc-bus patches may suffer changes
> when addressing the VFIO review comments.
> 
> The patches do not address the comment regarding moving driver_override
> in the core code. I prefer not to tie these patches on that change and
> address that separately.
> 
> Bharat Bhushan (3):
>   bus/fsl-mc: add support for 'driver_override' in the mc-bus
>   bus/fsl-mc: Add dprc-reset-container support
>   bus/fsl-mc: Extend ICID size from 16bit to 32bit
> 
> Diana Craciun (10):
>   bus/fsl-mc: Do no longer export the total number of irqs outside
>     dprc_scan_objects
>   bus/fsl-mc: Add a new parameter to dprc_scan_objects function
>   bus/fsl-mc: Set the QMAN/BMAN region flags
>   bus/fsl-mc: Cache the DPRC API version
>   bus/fsl-mc: Export dprc_scan/dprc_remove functions to be used by
>     multiple entities
>   bus/fsl-mc: Export a cleanup function for DPRC
>   bus/fsl-mc: Add a container setup function
>   bus/fsl_mc: Do not rely on caller to provide non NULL mc_io
>   bus/fsl-mc: Export IRQ pool handling functions to be used by VFIO
>   bus/fsl-mc: Add a new version for dprc_get_obj_region command
> 
>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc-driver.c      | 190 ++++++++++++++++----------
>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc.c             | 141 +++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-allocator.c |  12 +-
>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c       |  64 ++++++++-
>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-private.h   |  31 ++---
>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/mc-io.c            |   7 +-
>  include/linux/fsl/mc.h                |  41 +++++-
>  7 files changed, 359 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
> 

For the series:
Reviewed-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
Acked-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>

---
Best Regards, Laurentiu
Greg KH Oct. 2, 2020, 1:55 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 02:06:41PM +0300, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/29/2020 11:54 AM, Diana Craciun wrote:
> > The vfio-mc bus driver needs some additional services to be exported by the
> > mc-bus driver like:
> > - a way to reset the DPRC container
> > - driver_override support
> > - functions to setup/tear down a DPRC
> > - functions for allocating the pool of interrupts. In case of VFIO the
> > interrupts are not configured at probe time, but later by userspace
> > request
> > 
> > v4 -> v5
> > - dprc_celanup should not fail
> > 
> > v3 -> v4
> > - Rebased on the latest kernel.
> > - Exported a dprc_remove function
> > 
> > v2 -> v3
> > - Add a new version for dprc_get_obj_region
> > - Export the cacheability bus specific bits defines
> > 
> > v1 -> v2
> > - Remove driver_override propagation through various functions
> > - Cache the DPRC API version
> > 
> > The patches are related with "vfio/fsl-mc: VFIO support for FSL-MC
> > devices" patches, but the series were split because they are targeting
> > different subsystems. However, the mc-bus patches may suffer changes
> > when addressing the VFIO review comments.
> > 
> > The patches do not address the comment regarding moving driver_override
> > in the core code. I prefer not to tie these patches on that change and
> > address that separately.
> > 
> > Bharat Bhushan (3):
> >   bus/fsl-mc: add support for 'driver_override' in the mc-bus
> >   bus/fsl-mc: Add dprc-reset-container support
> >   bus/fsl-mc: Extend ICID size from 16bit to 32bit
> > 
> > Diana Craciun (10):
> >   bus/fsl-mc: Do no longer export the total number of irqs outside
> >     dprc_scan_objects
> >   bus/fsl-mc: Add a new parameter to dprc_scan_objects function
> >   bus/fsl-mc: Set the QMAN/BMAN region flags
> >   bus/fsl-mc: Cache the DPRC API version
> >   bus/fsl-mc: Export dprc_scan/dprc_remove functions to be used by
> >     multiple entities
> >   bus/fsl-mc: Export a cleanup function for DPRC
> >   bus/fsl-mc: Add a container setup function
> >   bus/fsl_mc: Do not rely on caller to provide non NULL mc_io
> >   bus/fsl-mc: Export IRQ pool handling functions to be used by VFIO
> >   bus/fsl-mc: Add a new version for dprc_get_obj_region command
> > 
> >  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc-driver.c      | 190 ++++++++++++++++----------
> >  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc.c             | 141 +++++++++++++++----
> >  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-allocator.c |  12 +-
> >  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c       |  64 ++++++++-
> >  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-private.h   |  31 ++---
> >  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/mc-io.c            |   7 +-
> >  include/linux/fsl/mc.h                |  41 +++++-
> >  7 files changed, 359 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> For the series:
> Reviewed-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
> Acked-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>

Do you want me to take these patches in my tree, or are they going to
Linus some other way?

thanks,

greg k-h
Laurentiu Tudor Oct. 2, 2020, 1:56 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Greg,

On 10/2/2020 4:55 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 02:06:41PM +0300, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/29/2020 11:54 AM, Diana Craciun wrote:
>>> The vfio-mc bus driver needs some additional services to be exported by the
>>> mc-bus driver like:
>>> - a way to reset the DPRC container
>>> - driver_override support
>>> - functions to setup/tear down a DPRC
>>> - functions for allocating the pool of interrupts. In case of VFIO the
>>> interrupts are not configured at probe time, but later by userspace
>>> request
>>>
>>> v4 -> v5
>>> - dprc_celanup should not fail
>>>
>>> v3 -> v4
>>> - Rebased on the latest kernel.
>>> - Exported a dprc_remove function
>>>
>>> v2 -> v3
>>> - Add a new version for dprc_get_obj_region
>>> - Export the cacheability bus specific bits defines
>>>
>>> v1 -> v2
>>> - Remove driver_override propagation through various functions
>>> - Cache the DPRC API version
>>>
>>> The patches are related with "vfio/fsl-mc: VFIO support for FSL-MC
>>> devices" patches, but the series were split because they are targeting
>>> different subsystems. However, the mc-bus patches may suffer changes
>>> when addressing the VFIO review comments.
>>>
>>> The patches do not address the comment regarding moving driver_override
>>> in the core code. I prefer not to tie these patches on that change and
>>> address that separately.
>>>
>>> Bharat Bhushan (3):
>>>   bus/fsl-mc: add support for 'driver_override' in the mc-bus
>>>   bus/fsl-mc: Add dprc-reset-container support
>>>   bus/fsl-mc: Extend ICID size from 16bit to 32bit
>>>
>>> Diana Craciun (10):
>>>   bus/fsl-mc: Do no longer export the total number of irqs outside
>>>     dprc_scan_objects
>>>   bus/fsl-mc: Add a new parameter to dprc_scan_objects function
>>>   bus/fsl-mc: Set the QMAN/BMAN region flags
>>>   bus/fsl-mc: Cache the DPRC API version
>>>   bus/fsl-mc: Export dprc_scan/dprc_remove functions to be used by
>>>     multiple entities
>>>   bus/fsl-mc: Export a cleanup function for DPRC
>>>   bus/fsl-mc: Add a container setup function
>>>   bus/fsl_mc: Do not rely on caller to provide non NULL mc_io
>>>   bus/fsl-mc: Export IRQ pool handling functions to be used by VFIO
>>>   bus/fsl-mc: Add a new version for dprc_get_obj_region command
>>>
>>>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc-driver.c      | 190 ++++++++++++++++----------
>>>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc.c             | 141 +++++++++++++++----
>>>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-allocator.c |  12 +-
>>>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c       |  64 ++++++++-
>>>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-private.h   |  31 ++---
>>>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/mc-io.c            |   7 +-
>>>  include/linux/fsl/mc.h                |  41 +++++-
>>>  7 files changed, 359 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> For the series:
>> Reviewed-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
>> Acked-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
> 
> Do you want me to take these patches in my tree, or are they going to
> Linus some other way?

I'm prefectly fine with you picking up the patches through your tree.

---
Thanks & Best Regards, Laurentiu
Greg KH Oct. 2, 2020, 2:05 p.m. UTC | #4
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 04:56:52PM +0300, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On 10/2/2020 4:55 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 02:06:41PM +0300, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 9/29/2020 11:54 AM, Diana Craciun wrote:
> >>> The vfio-mc bus driver needs some additional services to be exported by the
> >>> mc-bus driver like:
> >>> - a way to reset the DPRC container
> >>> - driver_override support
> >>> - functions to setup/tear down a DPRC
> >>> - functions for allocating the pool of interrupts. In case of VFIO the
> >>> interrupts are not configured at probe time, but later by userspace
> >>> request
> >>>
> >>> v4 -> v5
> >>> - dprc_celanup should not fail
> >>>
> >>> v3 -> v4
> >>> - Rebased on the latest kernel.
> >>> - Exported a dprc_remove function
> >>>
> >>> v2 -> v3
> >>> - Add a new version for dprc_get_obj_region
> >>> - Export the cacheability bus specific bits defines
> >>>
> >>> v1 -> v2
> >>> - Remove driver_override propagation through various functions
> >>> - Cache the DPRC API version
> >>>
> >>> The patches are related with "vfio/fsl-mc: VFIO support for FSL-MC
> >>> devices" patches, but the series were split because they are targeting
> >>> different subsystems. However, the mc-bus patches may suffer changes
> >>> when addressing the VFIO review comments.
> >>>
> >>> The patches do not address the comment regarding moving driver_override
> >>> in the core code. I prefer not to tie these patches on that change and
> >>> address that separately.
> >>>
> >>> Bharat Bhushan (3):
> >>>   bus/fsl-mc: add support for 'driver_override' in the mc-bus
> >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Add dprc-reset-container support
> >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Extend ICID size from 16bit to 32bit
> >>>
> >>> Diana Craciun (10):
> >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Do no longer export the total number of irqs outside
> >>>     dprc_scan_objects
> >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Add a new parameter to dprc_scan_objects function
> >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Set the QMAN/BMAN region flags
> >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Cache the DPRC API version
> >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Export dprc_scan/dprc_remove functions to be used by
> >>>     multiple entities
> >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Export a cleanup function for DPRC
> >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Add a container setup function
> >>>   bus/fsl_mc: Do not rely on caller to provide non NULL mc_io
> >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Export IRQ pool handling functions to be used by VFIO
> >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Add a new version for dprc_get_obj_region command
> >>>
> >>>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc-driver.c      | 190 ++++++++++++++++----------
> >>>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc.c             | 141 +++++++++++++++----
> >>>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-allocator.c |  12 +-
> >>>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c       |  64 ++++++++-
> >>>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-private.h   |  31 ++---
> >>>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/mc-io.c            |   7 +-
> >>>  include/linux/fsl/mc.h                |  41 +++++-
> >>>  7 files changed, 359 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>
> >> For the series:
> >> Reviewed-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
> >> Acked-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
> > 
> > Do you want me to take these patches in my tree, or are they going to
> > Linus some other way?
> 
> I'm prefectly fine with you picking up the patches through your tree.

Great, now queued up.

greg k-h
Alex Williamson Oct. 15, 2020, 2:27 a.m. UTC | #5
On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:05:49 +0200
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 04:56:52PM +0300, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> > 
> > On 10/2/2020 4:55 PM, Greg KH wrote:  
> > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 02:06:41PM +0300, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:  
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 9/29/2020 11:54 AM, Diana Craciun wrote:  
> > >>> The vfio-mc bus driver needs some additional services to be exported by the
> > >>> mc-bus driver like:
> > >>> - a way to reset the DPRC container
> > >>> - driver_override support
> > >>> - functions to setup/tear down a DPRC
> > >>> - functions for allocating the pool of interrupts. In case of VFIO the
> > >>> interrupts are not configured at probe time, but later by userspace
> > >>> request
> > >>>
> > >>> v4 -> v5
> > >>> - dprc_celanup should not fail
> > >>>
> > >>> v3 -> v4
> > >>> - Rebased on the latest kernel.
> > >>> - Exported a dprc_remove function
> > >>>
> > >>> v2 -> v3
> > >>> - Add a new version for dprc_get_obj_region
> > >>> - Export the cacheability bus specific bits defines
> > >>>
> > >>> v1 -> v2
> > >>> - Remove driver_override propagation through various functions
> > >>> - Cache the DPRC API version
> > >>>
> > >>> The patches are related with "vfio/fsl-mc: VFIO support for FSL-MC
> > >>> devices" patches, but the series were split because they are targeting
> > >>> different subsystems. However, the mc-bus patches may suffer changes
> > >>> when addressing the VFIO review comments.
> > >>>
> > >>> The patches do not address the comment regarding moving driver_override
> > >>> in the core code. I prefer not to tie these patches on that change and
> > >>> address that separately.
> > >>>
> > >>> Bharat Bhushan (3):
> > >>>   bus/fsl-mc: add support for 'driver_override' in the mc-bus
> > >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Add dprc-reset-container support
> > >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Extend ICID size from 16bit to 32bit
> > >>>
> > >>> Diana Craciun (10):
> > >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Do no longer export the total number of irqs outside
> > >>>     dprc_scan_objects
> > >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Add a new parameter to dprc_scan_objects function
> > >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Set the QMAN/BMAN region flags
> > >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Cache the DPRC API version
> > >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Export dprc_scan/dprc_remove functions to be used by
> > >>>     multiple entities
> > >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Export a cleanup function for DPRC
> > >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Add a container setup function
> > >>>   bus/fsl_mc: Do not rely on caller to provide non NULL mc_io
> > >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Export IRQ pool handling functions to be used by VFIO
> > >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Add a new version for dprc_get_obj_region command
> > >>>
> > >>>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc-driver.c      | 190 ++++++++++++++++----------
> > >>>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc.c             | 141 +++++++++++++++----
> > >>>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-allocator.c |  12 +-
> > >>>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c       |  64 ++++++++-
> > >>>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-private.h   |  31 ++---
> > >>>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/mc-io.c            |   7 +-
> > >>>  include/linux/fsl/mc.h                |  41 +++++-
> > >>>  7 files changed, 359 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
> > >>>  
> > >>
> > >> For the series:
> > >> Reviewed-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
> > >> Acked-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>  
> > > 
> > > Do you want me to take these patches in my tree, or are they going to
> > > Linus some other way?  
> > 
> > I'm prefectly fine with you picking up the patches through your tree.  
> 
> Great, now queued up.

Hi Greg,

Diana has a vfio bus driver for fsl-mc devices queued up in my tree as
well.  After a linux-next build failure due to our branches being
applied in the wrong order, Stephen advised that the proper way to
handle this is to merge a shared branch with this series.  Do you have
a pull request imminent with this series or if not, would you mind
pushing such a branch?  Thanks,

Alex
Greg KH Oct. 15, 2020, 5:27 p.m. UTC | #6
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 08:27:42PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:05:49 +0200
> Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 04:56:52PM +0300, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > > 
> > > On 10/2/2020 4:55 PM, Greg KH wrote:  
> > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 02:06:41PM +0300, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:  
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On 9/29/2020 11:54 AM, Diana Craciun wrote:  
> > > >>> The vfio-mc bus driver needs some additional services to be exported by the
> > > >>> mc-bus driver like:
> > > >>> - a way to reset the DPRC container
> > > >>> - driver_override support
> > > >>> - functions to setup/tear down a DPRC
> > > >>> - functions for allocating the pool of interrupts. In case of VFIO the
> > > >>> interrupts are not configured at probe time, but later by userspace
> > > >>> request
> > > >>>
> > > >>> v4 -> v5
> > > >>> - dprc_celanup should not fail
> > > >>>
> > > >>> v3 -> v4
> > > >>> - Rebased on the latest kernel.
> > > >>> - Exported a dprc_remove function
> > > >>>
> > > >>> v2 -> v3
> > > >>> - Add a new version for dprc_get_obj_region
> > > >>> - Export the cacheability bus specific bits defines
> > > >>>
> > > >>> v1 -> v2
> > > >>> - Remove driver_override propagation through various functions
> > > >>> - Cache the DPRC API version
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The patches are related with "vfio/fsl-mc: VFIO support for FSL-MC
> > > >>> devices" patches, but the series were split because they are targeting
> > > >>> different subsystems. However, the mc-bus patches may suffer changes
> > > >>> when addressing the VFIO review comments.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The patches do not address the comment regarding moving driver_override
> > > >>> in the core code. I prefer not to tie these patches on that change and
> > > >>> address that separately.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Bharat Bhushan (3):
> > > >>>   bus/fsl-mc: add support for 'driver_override' in the mc-bus
> > > >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Add dprc-reset-container support
> > > >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Extend ICID size from 16bit to 32bit
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Diana Craciun (10):
> > > >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Do no longer export the total number of irqs outside
> > > >>>     dprc_scan_objects
> > > >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Add a new parameter to dprc_scan_objects function
> > > >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Set the QMAN/BMAN region flags
> > > >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Cache the DPRC API version
> > > >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Export dprc_scan/dprc_remove functions to be used by
> > > >>>     multiple entities
> > > >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Export a cleanup function for DPRC
> > > >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Add a container setup function
> > > >>>   bus/fsl_mc: Do not rely on caller to provide non NULL mc_io
> > > >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Export IRQ pool handling functions to be used by VFIO
> > > >>>   bus/fsl-mc: Add a new version for dprc_get_obj_region command
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc-driver.c      | 190 ++++++++++++++++----------
> > > >>>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc.c             | 141 +++++++++++++++----
> > > >>>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-allocator.c |  12 +-
> > > >>>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c       |  64 ++++++++-
> > > >>>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-private.h   |  31 ++---
> > > >>>  drivers/bus/fsl-mc/mc-io.c            |   7 +-
> > > >>>  include/linux/fsl/mc.h                |  41 +++++-
> > > >>>  7 files changed, 359 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
> > > >>>  
> > > >>
> > > >> For the series:
> > > >> Reviewed-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
> > > >> Acked-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>  
> > > > 
> > > > Do you want me to take these patches in my tree, or are they going to
> > > > Linus some other way?  
> > > 
> > > I'm prefectly fine with you picking up the patches through your tree.  
> > 
> > Great, now queued up.
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Diana has a vfio bus driver for fsl-mc devices queued up in my tree as
> well.  After a linux-next build failure due to our branches being
> applied in the wrong order, Stephen advised that the proper way to
> handle this is to merge a shared branch with this series.  Do you have
> a pull request imminent with this series or if not, would you mind
> pushing such a branch?  Thanks,

This should all now be in Linus's tree, so I don't think you need any
shared branch anymore :)

thanks,

greg k-h