Message ID | 1602799340-138152-1-git-send-email-jianxin.xiong@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | RDMA: Add dma-buf support | expand |
On 10/15/20 3:02 PM, Jianxin Xiong wrote: > This is the fifth version of the patch set. Changelog: > Hi, A minor point, but if you can tweak your email sending setup, it would be nice. Specifically, make follow-up patches a reply to the first item. That's a list convention, and git format-patch + git send-email *.patch is normally sufficient to make that happen, unless you override it by doing something like sending each patch separately...which is my first suspicion as to how this happened. These patches are difficult to link to, because they don't follow the convention of patches 1-5 being in-reply-to patch 0. So if we want to ask people outside of this list to take a peek (I was about to), we have to go collect 5 or 6 different lore.kernel.org URLs, one for each patch... Take a look on lore and you can see the problem. Here's patch 0, and there is no way from there to find the remaining patches: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/1602799340-138152-1-git-send-email-jianxin.xiong@intel.com/ thanks,
> -----Original Message----- > From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> > Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 6:42 PM > To: Xiong, Jianxin <jianxin.xiong@intel.com>; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>; Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>; Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>; Sumit Semwal > <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>; Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@amd.com>; Vetter, Daniel <daniel.vetter@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] RDMA: Add dma-buf support > > On 10/15/20 3:02 PM, Jianxin Xiong wrote: > > This is the fifth version of the patch set. Changelog: > > > > Hi, > > A minor point, but if you can tweak your email sending setup, it would be nice. > Specifically, make follow-up patches a reply to the first item. That's a list convention, and git format-patch + git send-email *.patch is > normally sufficient to make that happen, unless you override it by doing something like sending each patch separately...which is my first > suspicion as to how this happened. > > These patches are difficult to link to, because they don't follow the convention of patches 1-5 being in-reply-to patch 0. So if we want to > ask people outside of this list to take a peek (I was about to), we have to go collect 5 or 6 different lore.kernel.org URLs, one for each > patch... > > Take a look on lore and you can see the problem. Here's patch 0, and there is no way from there to find the remaining patches: > > https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/1602799340-138152-1-git-send-email-jianxin.xiong@intel.com/ > > Hi John, Thanks for pointing this out. I didn't realize sending out patches individually would cause the difference compared to sending with a single command. Only version 4 and 5 have this issue and I will switch back to my old script for the next version. Thanks, Jianxin > thanks, > -- > John Hubbard > NVIDIA >