Message ID | 20201004133818.2947-1-krzk@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 8bc946b1a1c2a23b0ee15b84da89da24d1b27cba |
Headers | show |
Series | [GIT,PULL] ARM: dts: exynos: Third round for v5.10 | expand |
Hello: This pull request was applied to soc/soc.git (refs/heads/arm/fixes): On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 15:38:18 +0200 you wrote: > Hi, > > On top of previous pull request. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [GIT,PULL] ARM: dts: exynos: Third round for v5.10 https://git.kernel.org/soc/soc/c/8bc946b1a1c2 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 03:38:18PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Hi, > > On top of previous pull request. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof Dear Arnd and Olof, I got a notification from Patchwork that this was merged but I cannot find it in your for-next or fixes. Shall I resend it? Best regards, Krzysztof > > > The following changes since commit 6995a4c46331e39646e1bbe4418acf5cf00ef536: > > ARM: dts: s5pv210: replace deprecated "gpios" i2c-gpio property in Goni (2020-09-16 19:17:25 +0200) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git tags/samsung-dt-5.10-3 > > for you to fetch changes up to 944752bf9083b95fd02c8e240dbc62a24008bdc9: > > ARM: dts: exynos: Add a placeholder for a MAC address (2020-10-01 20:45:36 +0200) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Samsung DTS ARM changes for v5.10, part three > > 1. Revert a commit from earlier pull request adding input clock to CMU. > It causes probe reordering of clkout and CMU clocks drivers. The > clkout driver does not handle probe deferral thus this reorder causes > its probe failure. The proper solution is actually to convert clkout > driver to a regular module driver supporting probe deferral, but > before this happens revert is simpler approach to fix Odroid U3 boot. > 2. Add a placeholder for USB Ethernet adapter's MAC address on Odroid > XU3 board. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Krzysztof Kozlowski (1): > ARM: dts: exynos: revert "add input clock to CMU in Exynos4412 Odroid" > > Łukasz Stelmach (1): > ARM: dts: exynos: Add a placeholder for a MAC address > > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-odroid-common.dtsi | 1 - > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3.dts | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 8:21 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 03:38:18PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On top of previous pull request. > > > > Best regards, > > Krzysztof > > Dear Arnd and Olof, > > I got a notification from Patchwork that this was merged but I cannot > find it in your for-next or fixes. > > Shall I resend it? > Yes, please do. Do we need these commits in v5.10, or are they for v5.11 at this point? Arnd
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 22:26, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 8:21 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 03:38:18PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On top of previous pull request. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Krzysztof > > > > Dear Arnd and Olof, > > > > I got a notification from Patchwork that this was merged but I cannot > > find it in your for-next or fixes. > > > > Shall I resend it? > > > > Yes, please do. Do we need these commits in v5.10, or are they > for v5.11 at this point? The revert is actually a fix so it should go to v5.10. The other one could wait but I think there is no need to split them. Best regards, Krzysztof
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 22:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 22:26, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 8:21 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 03:38:18PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On top of previous pull request. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Krzysztof > > > > > > Dear Arnd and Olof, > > > > > > I got a notification from Patchwork that this was merged but I cannot > > > find it in your for-next or fixes. > > > > > > Shall I resend it? > > > > > > > Yes, please do. Do we need these commits in v5.10, or are they > > for v5.11 at this point? > > The revert is actually a fix so it should go to v5.10. The other one > could wait but I think there is no need to split them. The pull request was on top of previous ones so if I am rebasing, then let's just apply the fix for v5.10 and the second one I will roll to the next cycle. I'll send the fix as a separate patch. Best regards, Krzysztof