Message ID | 20201013142448.v2.2.I7b22281453b8a18ab16ef2bfd4c641fb1cc6a92c@changeid (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 9cb4c67d7717135d6f4600a49ab07b470ea4ee2f |
Headers | show |
Series | i2c: i2c-qcom-geni: More properly fix the DMA race | expand |
On Tue 13 Oct 16:25 CDT 2020, Douglas Anderson wrote: > This reverts commit 02b9aec59243c6240fc42884acc958602146ddf6. > > As talked about in the patch ("soc: qcom: geni: More properly switch > to DMA mode"), swapping the order of geni_se_setup_m_cmd() and > geni_se_xx_dma_prep() can sometimes cause corrupted transfers. Thus > we traded one problem for another. Now that we've debugged the > problem further and fixed the geni helper functions to more disable > FIFO interrupts when we move to DMA mode we can revert it and end up > with (hopefully) zero problems! > > To be explicit, the patch ("soc: qcom: geni: More properly switch > to DMA mode") is a prerequisite for this one. > > Fixes: 02b9aec59243 ("i2c: i2c-qcom-geni: Fix DMA transfer race") > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Akash Asthana <akashast@codeaurora.org> > Tested-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> Wolfram, would you like to pick this patch or would you prefer that it goes together with the other two through the soc tree? Per Doug's description it has a functional dependency on patch 1, but as long as all three patches makes it into v5.11 I'm okay with either way. Regards, Bjorn > --- > > (no changes since v1) > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c > index dead5db3315a..32b2a9921b14 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c > @@ -367,6 +367,7 @@ static int geni_i2c_rx_one_msg(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, struct i2c_msg *msg, > geni_se_select_mode(se, GENI_SE_FIFO); > > writel_relaxed(len, se->base + SE_I2C_RX_TRANS_LEN); > + geni_se_setup_m_cmd(se, I2C_READ, m_param); > > if (dma_buf && geni_se_rx_dma_prep(se, dma_buf, len, &rx_dma)) { > geni_se_select_mode(se, GENI_SE_FIFO); > @@ -374,8 +375,6 @@ static int geni_i2c_rx_one_msg(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, struct i2c_msg *msg, > dma_buf = NULL; > } > > - geni_se_setup_m_cmd(se, I2C_READ, m_param); > - > time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&gi2c->done, XFER_TIMEOUT); > if (!time_left) > geni_i2c_abort_xfer(gi2c); > @@ -409,6 +408,7 @@ static int geni_i2c_tx_one_msg(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, struct i2c_msg *msg, > geni_se_select_mode(se, GENI_SE_FIFO); > > writel_relaxed(len, se->base + SE_I2C_TX_TRANS_LEN); > + geni_se_setup_m_cmd(se, I2C_WRITE, m_param); > > if (dma_buf && geni_se_tx_dma_prep(se, dma_buf, len, &tx_dma)) { > geni_se_select_mode(se, GENI_SE_FIFO); > @@ -416,8 +416,6 @@ static int geni_i2c_tx_one_msg(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, struct i2c_msg *msg, > dma_buf = NULL; > } > > - geni_se_setup_m_cmd(se, I2C_WRITE, m_param); > - > if (!dma_buf) /* Get FIFO IRQ */ > writel_relaxed(1, se->base + SE_GENI_TX_WATERMARK_REG); > > -- > 2.28.0.1011.ga647a8990f-goog >
> Wolfram, would you like to pick this patch or would you prefer that it > goes together with the other two through the soc tree? Actually, I prefer the soc tree because of the functional dependency. I am not aware of any pending qcom-geni patches, yet I think an immutable branch for me to pull in would be nice in this case. Could you provide one for me?
On Mon 26 Oct 10:13 CDT 2020, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > Wolfram, would you like to pick this patch or would you prefer that it > > goes together with the other two through the soc tree? > > Actually, I prefer the soc tree because of the functional dependency. I > am not aware of any pending qcom-geni patches, yet I think an immutable > branch for me to pull in would be nice in this case. Could you provide > one for me? > Sounds good, please find the series applied on top of v5.10-rc1 at: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/qcom/linux.git tags/20201013212531.428538-1-dianders@chromium.org I've merged the same into the qcom tree for 5.11. Regards, Bjorn
> Sounds good, please find the series applied on top of v5.10-rc1 at: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/qcom/linux.git tags/20201013212531.428538-1-dianders@chromium.org Thanks, pulled.
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c index dead5db3315a..32b2a9921b14 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c @@ -367,6 +367,7 @@ static int geni_i2c_rx_one_msg(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, struct i2c_msg *msg, geni_se_select_mode(se, GENI_SE_FIFO); writel_relaxed(len, se->base + SE_I2C_RX_TRANS_LEN); + geni_se_setup_m_cmd(se, I2C_READ, m_param); if (dma_buf && geni_se_rx_dma_prep(se, dma_buf, len, &rx_dma)) { geni_se_select_mode(se, GENI_SE_FIFO); @@ -374,8 +375,6 @@ static int geni_i2c_rx_one_msg(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, struct i2c_msg *msg, dma_buf = NULL; } - geni_se_setup_m_cmd(se, I2C_READ, m_param); - time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&gi2c->done, XFER_TIMEOUT); if (!time_left) geni_i2c_abort_xfer(gi2c); @@ -409,6 +408,7 @@ static int geni_i2c_tx_one_msg(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, struct i2c_msg *msg, geni_se_select_mode(se, GENI_SE_FIFO); writel_relaxed(len, se->base + SE_I2C_TX_TRANS_LEN); + geni_se_setup_m_cmd(se, I2C_WRITE, m_param); if (dma_buf && geni_se_tx_dma_prep(se, dma_buf, len, &tx_dma)) { geni_se_select_mode(se, GENI_SE_FIFO); @@ -416,8 +416,6 @@ static int geni_i2c_tx_one_msg(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, struct i2c_msg *msg, dma_buf = NULL; } - geni_se_setup_m_cmd(se, I2C_WRITE, m_param); - if (!dma_buf) /* Get FIFO IRQ */ writel_relaxed(1, se->base + SE_GENI_TX_WATERMARK_REG);