Message ID | 20201104134408.19911-1-digetx@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v3] mfd: tps65910: Correct power-off programming sequence | expand |
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 04:44:08PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > This patch fixes system shutdown on a devices that use TPS65910 as a > system's power controller. In accordance to the TPS65910 datasheet, the > PMIC's state-machine transitions into the OFF state only when DEV_OFF > bit of DEVCTRL_REG is set. The ON / SLEEP states also should be cleared, > otherwise PMIC won't get into a proper state on shutdown. Devices like > Nexus 7 tablet and Ouya game console are now shutting down properly. [...] You might want to rebase on https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/9/26/397 as it's probably going to be accepted shortly. This just means replacing register accesses: tps65910_reg_*() -> regmap_*(). Best Regards, Michał Mirosław
05.11.2020 04:33, Michał Mirosław пишет: > On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 04:44:08PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> This patch fixes system shutdown on a devices that use TPS65910 as a >> system's power controller. In accordance to the TPS65910 datasheet, the >> PMIC's state-machine transitions into the OFF state only when DEV_OFF >> bit of DEVCTRL_REG is set. The ON / SLEEP states also should be cleared, >> otherwise PMIC won't get into a proper state on shutdown. Devices like >> Nexus 7 tablet and Ouya game console are now shutting down properly. > [...] > > You might want to rebase on https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/9/26/397 as it's > probably going to be accepted shortly. This just means replacing > register accesses: tps65910_reg_*() -> regmap_*(). I'll update this patch once yours series will hit linux-next, thanks!
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c index 11959021b50a..388214241558 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c @@ -436,12 +436,18 @@ static void tps65910_power_off(void) tps65910 = dev_get_drvdata(&tps65910_i2c_client->dev); + /* + * Note that the PWR_OFF bit needs to be set separately, before + * transitioning to the OFF state. It enables the "sequential" + * power-off mode on TPS65911, it's a NO-OP on TPS65910. + */ if (tps65910_reg_set_bits(tps65910, TPS65910_DEVCTRL, DEVCTRL_PWR_OFF_MASK) < 0) return; - tps65910_reg_clear_bits(tps65910, TPS65910_DEVCTRL, - DEVCTRL_DEV_ON_MASK); + tps65910_reg_update_bits(tps65910, TPS65910_DEVCTRL, + DEVCTRL_DEV_OFF_MASK | DEVCTRL_DEV_ON_MASK, + DEVCTRL_DEV_OFF_MASK); } static int tps65910_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,