Message ID | 20201115192951.1073632-4-jic23@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/9] dt-bindings:iio:qcom-spmi-vadc drop incorrect io-channel-ranges from example | expand |
On 11/15/2020 11:29 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> > > This property applies to consumers of io-channels. In this case we > have a provider so the property is not used. > > Not dt_schema will now detect this as an error due to a dependency > between this property and the io-channels property. > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> > Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Applied to devicetree/next, with the second paragraph fixed to: """ Recent changes to dt-schema result int his being reported as an error as a dependency is enforced between this property and io-channels. """" since it did not look like a correct sentence making sense otherwise. PS: please make sure you run get_maintainer.pl, this patch did not land in our patchwork instance since bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com was not copied. Thanks you
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 19:23:21 -0800 Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/15/2020 11:29 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> > > > > This property applies to consumers of io-channels. In this case we > > have a provider so the property is not used. > > > > Not dt_schema will now detect this as an error due to a dependency > > between this property and the io-channels property. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> > > Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> > > Applied to devicetree/next, with the second paragraph fixed to: > > """ > Recent changes to dt-schema result int his being reported as an error > as a dependency is enforced between this property and io-channels. > """" > > since it did not look like a correct sentence making sense otherwise. Oops. I shouldn't write patch descriptions on a Sunday evening. Indeed it was garbage. > > PS: please make sure you run get_maintainer.pl, this patch did not land > in our patchwork instance since bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com > was not copied. Sorry, these cross tree patch series are a bit of a pain to deal with but I should have picked up on that one. Jonathan > > Thanks you
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm-cygnus.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm-cygnus.dtsi index dacaef2c14ca..0025c88f660c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm-cygnus.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm-cygnus.dtsi @@ -591,7 +591,6 @@ touchscreen: touchscreen@180a6000 { adc: adc@180a6000 { compatible = "brcm,iproc-static-adc"; #io-channel-cells = <1>; - io-channel-ranges; adc-syscon = <&ts_adc_syscon>; clocks = <&asiu_clks BCM_CYGNUS_ASIU_ADC_CLK>; clock-names = "tsc_clk";