Message ID | 20201022202355.3529836-1-samitolvanen@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | scs: switch to vmapped shadow stacks | expand |
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 01:23:53PM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote: > As discussed a few months ago [1][2], virtually mapped shadow call stacks > are better for safety and robustness. This series dusts off the VMAP > option from the original SCS patch series and switches the kernel to use > virtually mapped shadow stacks unconditionally when SCS is enabled. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200515172355.GD23334@willie-the-truck/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200427220942.GB80713@google.com/ > > > Sami Tolvanen (2): > scs: switch to vmapped shadow stacks > arm64: scs: use vmapped IRQ and SDEI shadow stacks Will, Mark. Any objections to this series? If not, I can queue it for 5.11 via the arm64 tree. Thanks.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 05:35:24PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 01:23:53PM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote: > > As discussed a few months ago [1][2], virtually mapped shadow call stacks > > are better for safety and robustness. This series dusts off the VMAP > > option from the original SCS patch series and switches the kernel to use > > virtually mapped shadow stacks unconditionally when SCS is enabled. > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200515172355.GD23334@willie-the-truck/ > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200427220942.GB80713@google.com/ > > > > > > Sami Tolvanen (2): > > scs: switch to vmapped shadow stacks > > arm64: scs: use vmapped IRQ and SDEI shadow stacks > > Will, Mark. Any objections to this series? If not, I can queue it for > 5.11 via the arm64 tree. It's on my list to review, but I have a tonne of other things I have to get to first. Will