diff mbox series

[5/7] bpf: Add BPF_FETCH field / create atomic_fetch_add instruction

Message ID 20201123173202.1335708-6-jackmanb@google.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series Atomics for eBPF | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Not a local patch

Commit Message

Brendan Jackman Nov. 23, 2020, 5:32 p.m. UTC
This value can be set in bpf_insn.imm, for BPF_ATOMIC instructions,
in order to have the previous value of the atomically-modified memory
location loaded into the src register after an atomic op is carried
out.

Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c    | 21 ++++++++++---------
 include/linux/filter.h         |  9 +++++++++
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |  3 +++
 kernel/bpf/core.c              | 17 ++++++++++++++--
 kernel/bpf/disasm.c            |  6 ++++++
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c          | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 tools/include/linux/filter.h   | 10 ++++++++-
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |  3 +++
 8 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

Comments

kernel test robot Nov. 23, 2020, 9:12 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Brendan,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master]
[also build test WARNING on bpf/master powerpc/next linus/master v5.10-rc5 next-20201123]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Brendan-Jackman/Atomics-for-eBPF/20201124-013549
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
config: arc-randconfig-s031-20201123 (attached as .config)
compiler: arc-elf-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce:
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # apt-get install sparse
        # sparse version: v0.6.3-134-gb59dbdaf-dirty
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/b2b5923320904ef8c33183e8e88042588eb99397
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Brendan-Jackman/Atomics-for-eBPF/20201124-013549
        git checkout b2b5923320904ef8c33183e8e88042588eb99397
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' ARCH=arc 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>


"sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)"
   kernel/bpf/core.c:209:49: sparse: sparse: arithmetics on pointers to functions
   kernel/bpf/core.c:1521:43: sparse: sparse: arithmetics on pointers to functions
   kernel/bpf/core.c:1526:48: sparse: sparse: arithmetics on pointers to functions
   kernel/bpf/core.c:1742:77: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs
   kernel/bpf/core.c: note: in included file (through include/trace/trace_events.h, include/trace/define_trace.h, include/trace/events/xdp.h, ...):
   include/trace/events/xdp.h:308:1: sparse: sparse: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
   include/trace/events/xdp.h:335:1: sparse: sparse: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
   include/trace/events/xdp.h:369:1: sparse: sparse: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
>> kernel/bpf/core.c:1656:60: sparse: sparse: non size-preserving integer to pointer cast

vim +1656 kernel/bpf/core.c

  1628	
  1629		STX_ATOMIC_W:
  1630			switch (IMM) {
  1631			case BPF_ADD:
  1632				/* lock xadd *(u32 *)(dst_reg + off16) += src_reg */
  1633				atomic_add((u32) SRC, (atomic_t *)(unsigned long)
  1634					   (DST + insn->off));
  1635				break;
  1636			case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH:
  1637				SRC = (u32) atomic_fetch_add(
  1638					(u32) SRC,
  1639					(atomic_t *)(unsigned long) (DST + insn->off));
  1640				break;
  1641			default:
  1642				goto default_label;
  1643			}
  1644			CONT;
  1645	
  1646		STX_ATOMIC_DW:
  1647			switch (IMM) {
  1648			case BPF_ADD:
  1649				/* lock xadd *(u64 *)(dst_reg + off16) += src_reg */
  1650				atomic64_add((u64) SRC, (atomic64_t *)(unsigned long)
  1651					     (DST + insn->off));
  1652				break;
  1653			case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH:
  1654				SRC = (u64) atomic64_fetch_add(
  1655					(u64) SRC,
> 1656					(atomic64_t *)(s64) (DST + insn->off));
  1657				break;
  1658			default:
  1659				goto default_label;
  1660			}
  1661			CONT;
  1662	
  1663		default_label:
  1664			/* If we ever reach this, we have a bug somewhere. Die hard here
  1665			 * instead of just returning 0; we could be somewhere in a subprog,
  1666			 * so execution could continue otherwise which we do /not/ want.
  1667			 *
  1668			 * Note, verifier whitelists all opcodes in bpf_opcode_in_insntable().
  1669			 */
  1670			pr_warn("BPF interpreter: unknown opcode %02x (imm: 0x%x)\n",
  1671				insn->code, insn->imm);
  1672			BUG_ON(1);
  1673			return 0;
  1674	}
  1675	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
kernel test robot Nov. 23, 2020, 9:51 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Brendan,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master]
[also build test WARNING on bpf/master powerpc/next linus/master v5.10-rc5 next-20201123]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Brendan-Jackman/Atomics-for-eBPF/20201124-013549
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
config: m68k-randconfig-r005-20201123 (attached as .config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/b2b5923320904ef8c33183e8e88042588eb99397
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Brendan-Jackman/Atomics-for-eBPF/20201124-013549
        git checkout b2b5923320904ef8c33183e8e88042588eb99397
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=m68k 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:11,
                    from include/linux/list.h:9,
                    from include/linux/preempt.h:11,
                    from arch/m68k/include/asm/irqflags.h:6,
                    from include/linux/irqflags.h:16,
                    from arch/m68k/include/asm/atomic.h:6,
                    from include/linux/atomic.h:7,
                    from include/linux/filter.h:10,
                    from kernel/bpf/core.c:21:
   include/linux/scatterlist.h: In function 'sg_set_buf':
   arch/m68k/include/asm/page_no.h:33:50: warning: ordered comparison of pointer with null pointer [-Wextra]
      33 | #define virt_addr_valid(kaddr) (((void *)(kaddr) >= (void *)PAGE_OFFSET) && \
         |                                                  ^~
   include/linux/compiler.h:78:42: note: in definition of macro 'unlikely'
      78 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
         |                                          ^
   include/linux/scatterlist.h:143:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUG_ON'
     143 |  BUG_ON(!virt_addr_valid(buf));
         |  ^~~~~~
   include/linux/scatterlist.h:143:10: note: in expansion of macro 'virt_addr_valid'
     143 |  BUG_ON(!virt_addr_valid(buf));
         |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/bpf/core.c: At top level:
   kernel/bpf/core.c:1358:12: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_probe_read_kernel' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    1358 | u64 __weak bpf_probe_read_kernel(void *dst, u32 size, const void *unsafe_ptr)
         |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   In file included from kernel/bpf/core.c:21:
   kernel/bpf/core.c: In function '___bpf_prog_run':
   include/linux/filter.h:899:3: warning: cast between incompatible function types from 'u64 (*)(u64,  u64,  u64,  u64,  u64)' {aka 'long long unsigned int (*)(long long unsigned int,  long long unsigned int,  long long unsigned int,  long long unsigned int,  long long unsigned int)'} to 'u64 (*)(u64,  u64,  u64,  u64,  u64,  const struct bpf_insn *)' {aka 'long long unsigned int (*)(long long unsigned int,  long long unsigned int,  long long unsigned int,  long long unsigned int,  long long unsigned int,  const struct bpf_insn *)'} [-Wcast-function-type]
     899 |  ((u64 (*)(u64, u64, u64, u64, u64, const struct bpf_insn *)) \
         |   ^
   kernel/bpf/core.c:1526:13: note: in expansion of macro '__bpf_call_base_args'
    1526 |   BPF_R0 = (__bpf_call_base_args + insn->imm)(BPF_R1, BPF_R2,
         |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> kernel/bpf/core.c:1656:5: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
    1656 |     (atomic64_t *)(s64) (DST + insn->off));
         |     ^
   In file included from kernel/bpf/core.c:21:
   kernel/bpf/core.c: In function 'bpf_patch_call_args':
   include/linux/filter.h:899:3: warning: cast between incompatible function types from 'u64 (*)(u64,  u64,  u64,  u64,  u64)' {aka 'long long unsigned int (*)(long long unsigned int,  long long unsigned int,  long long unsigned int,  long long unsigned int,  long long unsigned int)'} to 'u64 (*)(u64,  u64,  u64,  u64,  u64,  const struct bpf_insn *)' {aka 'long long unsigned int (*)(long long unsigned int,  long long unsigned int,  long long unsigned int,  long long unsigned int,  long long unsigned int,  const struct bpf_insn *)'} [-Wcast-function-type]
     899 |  ((u64 (*)(u64, u64, u64, u64, u64, const struct bpf_insn *)) \
         |   ^
   kernel/bpf/core.c:1743:3: note: in expansion of macro '__bpf_call_base_args'
    1743 |   __bpf_call_base_args;
         |   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

vim +1656 kernel/bpf/core.c

  1628	
  1629		STX_ATOMIC_W:
  1630			switch (IMM) {
  1631			case BPF_ADD:
  1632				/* lock xadd *(u32 *)(dst_reg + off16) += src_reg */
  1633				atomic_add((u32) SRC, (atomic_t *)(unsigned long)
  1634					   (DST + insn->off));
  1635				break;
  1636			case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH:
  1637				SRC = (u32) atomic_fetch_add(
  1638					(u32) SRC,
  1639					(atomic_t *)(unsigned long) (DST + insn->off));
  1640				break;
  1641			default:
  1642				goto default_label;
  1643			}
  1644			CONT;
  1645	
  1646		STX_ATOMIC_DW:
  1647			switch (IMM) {
  1648			case BPF_ADD:
  1649				/* lock xadd *(u64 *)(dst_reg + off16) += src_reg */
  1650				atomic64_add((u64) SRC, (atomic64_t *)(unsigned long)
  1651					     (DST + insn->off));
  1652				break;
  1653			case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH:
  1654				SRC = (u64) atomic64_fetch_add(
  1655					(u64) SRC,
> 1656					(atomic64_t *)(s64) (DST + insn->off));
  1657				break;
  1658			default:
  1659				goto default_label;
  1660			}
  1661			CONT;
  1662	
  1663		default_label:
  1664			/* If we ever reach this, we have a bug somewhere. Die hard here
  1665			 * instead of just returning 0; we could be somewhere in a subprog,
  1666			 * so execution could continue otherwise which we do /not/ want.
  1667			 *
  1668			 * Note, verifier whitelists all opcodes in bpf_opcode_in_insntable().
  1669			 */
  1670			pr_warn("BPF interpreter: unknown opcode %02x (imm: 0x%x)\n",
  1671				insn->code, insn->imm);
  1672			BUG_ON(1);
  1673			return 0;
  1674	}
  1675	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Alexei Starovoitov Nov. 24, 2020, 6:52 a.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 05:32:00PM +0000, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> @@ -3644,8 +3649,21 @@ static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_i
>  		return err;
>  
>  	/* check whether we can write into the same memory */
> -	return check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
> -				BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, -1, true);
> +	err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
> +			       BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, -1, true);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	if (!(insn->imm & BPF_FETCH))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* check and record load of old value into src reg  */
> +	err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, DST_OP);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +	regs[insn->src_reg].type = SCALAR_VALUE;

check_reg_arg() will call mark_reg_unknown() which will set type to SCALAR_VALUE.
What is the point of another assignment?
Brendan Jackman Nov. 24, 2020, 10:48 a.m. UTC | #4
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:52:57PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 05:32:00PM +0000, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> > @@ -3644,8 +3649,21 @@ static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_i
> >  		return err;
> >  
> >  	/* check whether we can write into the same memory */
> > -	return check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
> > -				BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, -1, true);
> > +	err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
> > +			       BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, -1, true);
> > +	if (err)
> > +		return err;
> > +
> > +	if (!(insn->imm & BPF_FETCH))
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	/* check and record load of old value into src reg  */
> > +	err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, DST_OP);
> > +	if (err)
> > +		return err;
> > +	regs[insn->src_reg].type = SCALAR_VALUE;
> 
> check_reg_arg() will call mark_reg_unknown() which will set type to SCALAR_VALUE.
> What is the point of another assignment?

Yep, this is just an oversight - thanks, will remove.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 0ff2416d99b6..b475bf525424 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1255,22 +1255,25 @@  st:			if (is_imm8(insn->off))
 
 		case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W:
 		case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW:
-			if (insn->imm != BPF_ADD) {
+			if (BPF_OP(insn->imm) != BPF_ADD) {
 				pr_err("bpf_jit: unknown opcode %02x\n", insn->imm);
 				return -EFAULT;
 			}
 
-			/* XADD: lock *(u32/u64*)(dst_reg + off) += src_reg */
+			EMIT1(0xF0); /* lock prefix */
 
-			if (BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_W) {
-				/* Emit 'lock add dword ptr [rax + off], eax' */
-				if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg))
-					EMIT3(0xF0, add_2mod(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x01);
-				else
-					EMIT2(0xF0, 0x01);
+			maybe_emit_rex(&prog, dst_reg, src_reg,
+				       BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_DW);
+
+			/* emit opcode */
+			if (insn->imm & BPF_FETCH) {
+				/* src_reg = sync_fetch_and_add(*(dst_reg + off), src_reg); */
+				EMIT2(0x0F, 0xC1);
 			} else {
-				EMIT3(0xF0, add_2mod(0x48, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x01);
+				/* lock *(u32/u64*)(dst_reg + off) += src_reg */
+				EMIT1(0x01);
 			}
+
 			emit_modrm_dstoff(&prog, dst_reg, src_reg, insn->off);
 			break;
 
diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index ce19988fb312..bf0ff3649f46 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -270,6 +270,15 @@  static inline bool insn_is_zext(const struct bpf_insn *insn)
 		.imm   = BPF_ADD })
 #define BPF_STX_XADD BPF_ATOMIC_ADD /* alias */
 
+/* Atomic memory add with fetch, src_reg = sync_fetch_and_add(*(dst_reg + off), src_reg); */
+
+#define BPF_ATOMIC_FETCH_ADD(SIZE, DST, SRC, OFF)		\
+	((struct bpf_insn) {					\
+		.code  = BPF_STX | BPF_SIZE(SIZE) | BPF_ATOMIC,	\
+		.dst_reg = DST,					\
+		.src_reg = SRC,					\
+		.off   = OFF,					\
+		.imm   = BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH })
 
 /* Memory store, *(uint *) (dst_reg + off16) = imm32 */
 
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index dcd08783647d..ec7f415f331b 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ 
 #define BPF_CALL	0x80	/* function call */
 #define BPF_EXIT	0x90	/* function return */
 
+/* atomic op type fields (stored in immediate) */
+#define BPF_FETCH	0x01	/* fetch previous value into src reg */
+
 /* Register numbers */
 enum {
 	BPF_REG_0 = 0,
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 48b192a8edce..49a2a533db60 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -1627,21 +1627,34 @@  static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn, u64 *stack)
 #undef LDX_PROBE
 
 	STX_ATOMIC_W:
-		switch (insn->imm) {
+		switch (IMM) {
 		case BPF_ADD:
 			/* lock xadd *(u32 *)(dst_reg + off16) += src_reg */
 			atomic_add((u32) SRC, (atomic_t *)(unsigned long)
 				   (DST + insn->off));
+			break;
+		case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH:
+			SRC = (u32) atomic_fetch_add(
+				(u32) SRC,
+				(atomic_t *)(unsigned long) (DST + insn->off));
+			break;
 		default:
 			goto default_label;
 		}
 		CONT;
+
 	STX_ATOMIC_DW:
-		switch (insn->imm) {
+		switch (IMM) {
 		case BPF_ADD:
 			/* lock xadd *(u64 *)(dst_reg + off16) += src_reg */
 			atomic64_add((u64) SRC, (atomic64_t *)(unsigned long)
 				     (DST + insn->off));
+			break;
+		case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH:
+			SRC = (u64) atomic64_fetch_add(
+				(u64) SRC,
+				(atomic64_t *)(s64) (DST + insn->off));
+			break;
 		default:
 			goto default_label;
 		}
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
index 37c8d6e9b4cc..669cef265493 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
@@ -160,6 +160,12 @@  void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_insn_cbs *cbs,
 				bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3],
 				insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
 				insn->src_reg);
+		} else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC &&
+			   insn->imm == (BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH)) {
+			verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) r%d = atomic_fetch_add(*(%s *)(r%d %+d), r%d)\n",
+				insn->code, insn->src_reg,
+				bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3],
+				insn->dst_reg, insn->off, insn->src_reg);
 		} else {
 			verbose(cbs->private_data, "BUG_%02x\n", insn->code);
 		}
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 609cc5e9571f..14f5053daf22 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -3600,9 +3600,14 @@  static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn
 
 static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_insn *insn)
 {
+	struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env);
 	int err;
 
-	if (insn->imm != BPF_ADD) {
+	switch (insn->imm) {
+	case BPF_ADD:
+	case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH:
+		break;
+	default:
 		verbose(env, "BPF_ATOMIC uses invalid atomic opcode %02x\n", insn->imm);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -3631,7 +3636,7 @@  static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_i
 	    is_pkt_reg(env, insn->dst_reg) ||
 	    is_flow_key_reg(env, insn->dst_reg) ||
 	    is_sk_reg(env, insn->dst_reg)) {
-		verbose(env, "atomic stores into R%d %s is not allowed\n",
+		verbose(env, "BPF_ATOMIC stores into R%d %s is not allowed\n",
 			insn->dst_reg,
 			reg_type_str[reg_state(env, insn->dst_reg)->type]);
 		return -EACCES;
@@ -3644,8 +3649,21 @@  static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_i
 		return err;
 
 	/* check whether we can write into the same memory */
-	return check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
-				BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, -1, true);
+	err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
+			       BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, -1, true);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	if (!(insn->imm & BPF_FETCH))
+		return 0;
+
+	/* check and record load of old value into src reg  */
+	err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, DST_OP);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+	regs[insn->src_reg].type = SCALAR_VALUE;
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int __check_stack_boundary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
@@ -9490,12 +9508,6 @@  static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		} else if (class == BPF_STX) {
 			enum bpf_reg_type *prev_dst_type, dst_reg_type;
 
-			if (((BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM &&
-			      BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_ATOMIC) || insn->imm != 0)) {
-				verbose(env, "BPF_STX uses reserved fields\n");
-				return -EINVAL;
-			}
-
 			if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC) {
 				err = check_atomic(env, env->insn_idx, insn);
 				if (err)
@@ -9504,6 +9516,11 @@  static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 				continue;
 			}
 
+			if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM && insn->imm != 0) {
+				verbose(env, "BPF_STX uses reserved fields\n");
+				return -EINVAL;
+			}
+
 			/* check src1 operand */
 			err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP);
 			if (err)
diff --git a/tools/include/linux/filter.h b/tools/include/linux/filter.h
index 95ff51d97f25..8f2707ebab18 100644
--- a/tools/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/tools/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -180,7 +180,15 @@ 
 		.imm   = BPF_ADD })
 #define BPF_STX_XADD BPF_ATOMIC_ADD /* alias */
 
-/* Memory store, *(uint *) (dst_reg + off16) = imm32 */
+/* Atomic memory add with fetch, src_reg = sync_fetch_and_add(*(dst_reg + off), src_reg); */
+
+#define BPF_ATOMIC_FETCH_ADD(SIZE, DST, SRC, OFF)		\
+	((struct bpf_insn) {					\
+		.code  = BPF_STX | BPF_SIZE(SIZE) | BPF_ATOMIC,	\
+		.dst_reg = DST,					\
+		.src_reg = SRC,					\
+		.off   = OFF,					\
+		.imm   = BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH })
 
 #define BPF_ST_MEM(SIZE, DST, OFF, IMM)				\
 	((struct bpf_insn) {					\
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index dcd08783647d..ec7f415f331b 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ 
 #define BPF_CALL	0x80	/* function call */
 #define BPF_EXIT	0x90	/* function return */
 
+/* atomic op type fields (stored in immediate) */
+#define BPF_FETCH	0x01	/* fetch previous value into src reg */
+
 /* Register numbers */
 enum {
 	BPF_REG_0 = 0,