Message ID | 20201124071155.76868-2-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | drm: add DisplayPort connector | expand |
Hi Tomi, Thank you for the patch. On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:11:54AM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > Add binding for DisplayPort connector. A few notes: > > * Similar to hdmi-connector, it has hpd-gpios as an optional property, > as the HPD could also be handled by, e.g., the DP bridge. > > * dp-pwr-supply, which provides 3.3V on DP_PWR pin, is optional, as it > is not strictly required: standard DP cables do not even have the pin > connected. > > * Connector type. Full size and mini connectors are identical except for > the connector size and form, so I believe there is no functional need > for this property. But similar to 'label' property, it might be used > to present information about the connector to the userspace. > > * No eDP. There's really no "eDP connector", as it's always a custom > made connection between the DP and the DP panel, although the eDP spec > does offer a few suggested pin setups. So possibly there is no need for > edp-connector binding, but even if there is, I don't want to guess what > it could look like, and could it be part of the dp-connector binding. > > * No DP++. I'm not familiar with DP++. DP++ might need an i2c bus added > to the bindings. > > Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> > --- > .../display/connector/dp-connector.yaml | 55 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/connector/dp-connector.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/connector/dp-connector.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/connector/dp-connector.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..b5fc3e52899e > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/connector/dp-connector.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/connector/dp-connector.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: DisplayPort Connector > + > +maintainers: > + - Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + const: dp-connector > + > + label: true > + > + type: > + enum: > + - full-size > + - mini I wonder if "full" would be better than "full-size" to match "mini". Up to you. > + > + hpd-gpios: > + description: A GPIO line connected to HPD > + maxItems: 1 > + > + dp-pwr-supply: > + description: Power supply for the DP_PWR pin > + maxItems: 1 > + > + port: > + description: Connection to controller providing DP signals Now that the OF graph schema has landed, could you add the corresponding $ref ? Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> > + > +required: > + - compatible > + - type > + - port > + > +additionalProperties: false > + > +examples: > + - | > + connector { > + compatible = "dp-connector"; > + label = "dp0"; > + type = "full-size"; > + > + port { > + dp_connector_in: endpoint { > + remote-endpoint = <&dp_out>; > + }; > + }; > + }; > + > +...
On 30/11/2020 12:10, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Tomi, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:11:54AM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> Add binding for DisplayPort connector. A few notes: >> >> * Similar to hdmi-connector, it has hpd-gpios as an optional property, >> as the HPD could also be handled by, e.g., the DP bridge. >> >> * dp-pwr-supply, which provides 3.3V on DP_PWR pin, is optional, as it >> is not strictly required: standard DP cables do not even have the pin >> connected. >> >> * Connector type. Full size and mini connectors are identical except for >> the connector size and form, so I believe there is no functional need >> for this property. But similar to 'label' property, it might be used >> to present information about the connector to the userspace. >> >> * No eDP. There's really no "eDP connector", as it's always a custom >> made connection between the DP and the DP panel, although the eDP spec >> does offer a few suggested pin setups. So possibly there is no need for >> edp-connector binding, but even if there is, I don't want to guess what >> it could look like, and could it be part of the dp-connector binding. >> >> * No DP++. I'm not familiar with DP++. DP++ might need an i2c bus added >> to the bindings. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> >> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> >> --- >> .../display/connector/dp-connector.yaml | 55 +++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/connector/dp-connector.yaml >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/connector/dp-connector.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/connector/dp-connector.yaml >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..b5fc3e52899e >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/connector/dp-connector.yaml >> @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) >> +%YAML 1.2 >> +--- >> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/connector/dp-connector.yaml# >> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# >> + >> +title: DisplayPort Connector >> + >> +maintainers: >> + - Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> >> + >> +properties: >> + compatible: >> + const: dp-connector >> + >> + label: true >> + >> + type: >> + enum: >> + - full-size >> + - mini > > I wonder if "full" would be better than "full-size" to match "mini". Up > to you. The DP spec (and e.g. wikipedia) uses "full-size" and "mini". Well, the spec mostly uses "mDP", which is explained to mean "Mini DisplayPort". And full-size is used as "full-size DP". E.g. "The plug on either end may be a full-size DP plug or an mDP plug." We could use mDP here, but I think "mini" is more commonly used. And if we use mDP for mini, maybe we should use DP for the full-size. But then it's maybe a bit confusing. So I think "full-size" and "mini" match best to the spec and are still obvious for the human reader. Tomi
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/connector/dp-connector.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/connector/dp-connector.yaml new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..b5fc3e52899e --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/connector/dp-connector.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/connector/dp-connector.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# + +title: DisplayPort Connector + +maintainers: + - Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> + +properties: + compatible: + const: dp-connector + + label: true + + type: + enum: + - full-size + - mini + + hpd-gpios: + description: A GPIO line connected to HPD + maxItems: 1 + + dp-pwr-supply: + description: Power supply for the DP_PWR pin + maxItems: 1 + + port: + description: Connection to controller providing DP signals + +required: + - compatible + - type + - port + +additionalProperties: false + +examples: + - | + connector { + compatible = "dp-connector"; + label = "dp0"; + type = "full-size"; + + port { + dp_connector_in: endpoint { + remote-endpoint = <&dp_out>; + }; + }; + }; + +...
Add binding for DisplayPort connector. A few notes: * Similar to hdmi-connector, it has hpd-gpios as an optional property, as the HPD could also be handled by, e.g., the DP bridge. * dp-pwr-supply, which provides 3.3V on DP_PWR pin, is optional, as it is not strictly required: standard DP cables do not even have the pin connected. * Connector type. Full size and mini connectors are identical except for the connector size and form, so I believe there is no functional need for this property. But similar to 'label' property, it might be used to present information about the connector to the userspace. * No eDP. There's really no "eDP connector", as it's always a custom made connection between the DP and the DP panel, although the eDP spec does offer a few suggested pin setups. So possibly there is no need for edp-connector binding, but even if there is, I don't want to guess what it could look like, and could it be part of the dp-connector binding. * No DP++. I'm not familiar with DP++. DP++ might need an i2c bus added to the bindings. Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> --- .../display/connector/dp-connector.yaml | 55 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/connector/dp-connector.yaml -- Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki