| Message ID | 20201130133129.1024662-8-djrscally@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add functionality to ipu3-cio2 driver allowing software_node connections to sensors on platforms designed for Windows | expand |
Hi Daniel and Heikki, Thank you for the patch. On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:31:18PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote: > From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> > > From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> > There seems to be one From: line too many. You can drop the one in the commit message, git-format-patch will add it automatically. > This implements the remaining .graph_* callbacks in the > fwnode operations vector for the software nodes. That makes s/vector/structure/ ? > the fwnode_graph*() functions available in the drivers also > when software nodes are used. > > The implementation tries to mimic the "OF graph" as much as > possible, but there is no support for the "reg" device > property. The ports will need to have the index in their > name which starts with "port" (for example "port0", "port1", > ...) and endpoints will use the index of the software node > that is given to them during creation. The port nodes can > also be grouped under a specially named "ports" subnode, > just like in DT, if necessary. I'm not very familiar with swnodes, but could we name ports port@n instead of portn to mimic OF nodes ? > The remote-endpoints are reference properties under the > endpoint nodes that are named "remote-endpoint". > > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> > Co-developed-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com> > --- > changes since RFC v3: > - Simplified software_node_get_next_endpoint() a little > - Squared away references in software_node_get_next_endpoint() > and swnode_graph_find_next_port(), since they were affected by > the change to the earlier patch that had *get_next_child() also > put the previous reference. > - Dropped Andy's R-b, since the code changed. > changes in RFC v3: > - removed software_node_device_is_available > - moved the change to software_node_get_next_child to a separate > patch > - switched to use fwnode_handle_put() in graph_get_next_endpoint() > instead of software_node_put() > > changes in RFC v2: > - added software_node_device_is_available > - altered software_node_get_next_child to get references > - altered software_node_get_next_endpoint to release references > to ports and avoid passing invalid combinations of swnodes to > software_node_get_next_child > - altered swnode_graph_find_next_port to release port rather than > old > > drivers/base/swnode.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/swnode.c b/drivers/base/swnode.c > index 9bd0bb77ad5b..0c7a8d6b9ea8 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/swnode.c > +++ b/drivers/base/swnode.c > @@ -540,6 +540,110 @@ software_node_get_reference_args(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, > return 0; > } > > +static struct fwnode_handle * > +swnode_graph_find_next_port(const struct fwnode_handle *parent, > + struct fwnode_handle *port) > +{ > + struct fwnode_handle *old = port; > + > + while ((port = software_node_get_next_child(parent, old))) { > + if (!strncmp(to_swnode(port)->node->name, "port", 4)) > + return port; > + old = port; > + } > + > + return NULL; > +} > + > +static struct fwnode_handle * > +software_node_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, > + struct fwnode_handle *endpoint) > +{ > + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); > + struct fwnode_handle *old = endpoint; > + struct fwnode_handle *parent; > + struct fwnode_handle *port; > + > + if (!swnode) > + return NULL; > + > + if (endpoint) { > + port = software_node_get_parent(endpoint); > + parent = software_node_get_parent(port); > + } else { > + parent = software_node_get_named_child_node(fwnode, "ports"); > + if (!parent) > + parent = software_node_get(&swnode->fwnode); > + > + port = swnode_graph_find_next_port(parent, NULL); > + } > + > + for (; port; port = swnode_graph_find_next_port(parent, port)) { > + endpoint = software_node_get_next_child(port, old); > + if (endpoint) { > + fwnode_handle_put(port); > + break; > + } > + > + /* No more endpoints for that port, so stop passing old */ > + old = NULL; > + } > + > + fwnode_handle_put(parent); > + > + return endpoint; > +} > + > +static struct fwnode_handle * > +software_node_graph_get_remote_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode) > +{ > + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); > + const struct software_node_ref_args *ref; > + const struct property_entry *prop; > + > + if (!swnode) > + return NULL; > + > + prop = property_entry_get(swnode->node->properties, "remote-endpoint"); > + if (!prop || prop->type != DEV_PROP_REF || prop->is_inline) > + return NULL; > + > + ref = prop->pointer; > + > + return software_node_get(software_node_fwnode(ref[0].node)); > +} > + > +static struct fwnode_handle * > +software_node_graph_get_port_parent(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode) > +{ > + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); > + struct fwnode_handle *parent; > + > + if (!strcmp(swnode->parent->node->name, "ports")) > + parent = &swnode->parent->parent->fwnode; > + else > + parent = &swnode->parent->fwnode; > + > + return software_node_get(parent); > +} > + > +static int > +software_node_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, > + struct fwnode_endpoint *endpoint) > +{ > + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); > + int ret; > + > + ret = kstrtou32(swnode->parent->node->name + 4, 10, &endpoint->port); If we use port@, s/4/5/. But I suppose we also want to support the case where a single port is used, with its name set to "port" ? The logic would then need to be a tad more complex. Not sure if the consistency is worth the additional complexity, up to you. > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + endpoint->id = swnode->id; > + endpoint->local_fwnode = fwnode; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static const struct fwnode_operations software_node_ops = { > .get = software_node_get, > .put = software_node_put, > @@ -551,7 +655,11 @@ static const struct fwnode_operations software_node_ops = { > .get_parent = software_node_get_parent, > .get_next_child_node = software_node_get_next_child, > .get_named_child_node = software_node_get_named_child_node, > - .get_reference_args = software_node_get_reference_args > + .get_reference_args = software_node_get_reference_args, > + .graph_get_next_endpoint = software_node_graph_get_next_endpoint, > + .graph_get_remote_endpoint = software_node_graph_get_remote_endpoint, > + .graph_get_port_parent = software_node_graph_get_port_parent, > + .graph_parse_endpoint = software_node_graph_parse_endpoint, > }; > > /* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
Hi Laurent On 30/11/2020 16:25, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Daniel and Heikki, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:31:18PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote: >> From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> >> >> From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> >> > There seems to be one From: line too many. You can drop the one in the > commit message, git-format-patch will add it automatically. Ah! Thanks, sorry about that >> This implements the remaining .graph_* callbacks in the >> fwnode operations vector for the software nodes. That makes > s/vector/structure/ ? Yeah, sure. >> the fwnode_graph*() functions available in the drivers also >> when software nodes are used. >> >> The implementation tries to mimic the "OF graph" as much as >> possible, but there is no support for the "reg" device >> property. The ports will need to have the index in their >> name which starts with "port" (for example "port0", "port1", >> ...) and endpoints will use the index of the software node >> that is given to them during creation. The port nodes can >> also be grouped under a specially named "ports" subnode, >> just like in DT, if necessary. > I'm not very familiar with swnodes, but could we name ports port@n > instead of portn to mimic OF nodes ? Yes, I don't see any reason why not. > >> The remote-endpoints are reference properties under the >> endpoint nodes that are named "remote-endpoint". >> >> Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> >> Co-developed-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com> >> --- >> changes since RFC v3: >> - Simplified software_node_get_next_endpoint() a little >> - Squared away references in software_node_get_next_endpoint() >> and swnode_graph_find_next_port(), since they were affected by >> the change to the earlier patch that had *get_next_child() also >> put the previous reference. >> - Dropped Andy's R-b, since the code changed. >> changes in RFC v3: >> - removed software_node_device_is_available >> - moved the change to software_node_get_next_child to a separate >> patch >> - switched to use fwnode_handle_put() in graph_get_next_endpoint() >> instead of software_node_put() >> >> changes in RFC v2: >> - added software_node_device_is_available >> - altered software_node_get_next_child to get references >> - altered software_node_get_next_endpoint to release references >> to ports and avoid passing invalid combinations of swnodes to >> software_node_get_next_child >> - altered swnode_graph_find_next_port to release port rather than >> old >> >> drivers/base/swnode.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/base/swnode.c b/drivers/base/swnode.c >> index 9bd0bb77ad5b..0c7a8d6b9ea8 100644 >> --- a/drivers/base/swnode.c >> +++ b/drivers/base/swnode.c >> @@ -540,6 +540,110 @@ software_node_get_reference_args(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, >> return 0; >> } >> >> +static struct fwnode_handle * >> +swnode_graph_find_next_port(const struct fwnode_handle *parent, >> + struct fwnode_handle *port) >> +{ >> + struct fwnode_handle *old = port; >> + >> + while ((port = software_node_get_next_child(parent, old))) { >> + if (!strncmp(to_swnode(port)->node->name, "port", 4)) >> + return port; >> + old = port; >> + } >> + >> + return NULL; >> +} >> + >> +static struct fwnode_handle * >> +software_node_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, >> + struct fwnode_handle *endpoint) >> +{ >> + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); >> + struct fwnode_handle *old = endpoint; >> + struct fwnode_handle *parent; >> + struct fwnode_handle *port; >> + >> + if (!swnode) >> + return NULL; >> + >> + if (endpoint) { >> + port = software_node_get_parent(endpoint); >> + parent = software_node_get_parent(port); >> + } else { >> + parent = software_node_get_named_child_node(fwnode, "ports"); >> + if (!parent) >> + parent = software_node_get(&swnode->fwnode); >> + >> + port = swnode_graph_find_next_port(parent, NULL); >> + } >> + >> + for (; port; port = swnode_graph_find_next_port(parent, port)) { >> + endpoint = software_node_get_next_child(port, old); >> + if (endpoint) { >> + fwnode_handle_put(port); >> + break; >> + } >> + >> + /* No more endpoints for that port, so stop passing old */ >> + old = NULL; >> + } >> + >> + fwnode_handle_put(parent); >> + >> + return endpoint; >> +} >> + >> +static struct fwnode_handle * >> +software_node_graph_get_remote_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode) >> +{ >> + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); >> + const struct software_node_ref_args *ref; >> + const struct property_entry *prop; >> + >> + if (!swnode) >> + return NULL; >> + >> + prop = property_entry_get(swnode->node->properties, "remote-endpoint"); >> + if (!prop || prop->type != DEV_PROP_REF || prop->is_inline) >> + return NULL; >> + >> + ref = prop->pointer; >> + >> + return software_node_get(software_node_fwnode(ref[0].node)); >> +} >> + >> +static struct fwnode_handle * >> +software_node_graph_get_port_parent(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode) >> +{ >> + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); >> + struct fwnode_handle *parent; >> + >> + if (!strcmp(swnode->parent->node->name, "ports")) >> + parent = &swnode->parent->parent->fwnode; >> + else >> + parent = &swnode->parent->fwnode; >> + >> + return software_node_get(parent); >> +} >> + >> +static int >> +software_node_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, >> + struct fwnode_endpoint *endpoint) >> +{ >> + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = kstrtou32(swnode->parent->node->name + 4, 10, &endpoint->port); > If we use port@, s/4/5/. But I suppose we also want to support the case > where a single port is used, with its name set to "port" ? The logic > would then need to be a tad more complex. Not sure if the consistency is > worth the additional complexity, up to you. I'm conflicted; consistency is good but in my mind keeping the name as "port@0" for a single port rather than dropping the suffix is the better approach anyway. >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + >> + endpoint->id = swnode->id; >> + endpoint->local_fwnode = fwnode; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> static const struct fwnode_operations software_node_ops = { >> .get = software_node_get, >> .put = software_node_put, >> @@ -551,7 +655,11 @@ static const struct fwnode_operations software_node_ops = { >> .get_parent = software_node_get_parent, >> .get_next_child_node = software_node_get_next_child, >> .get_named_child_node = software_node_get_named_child_node, >> - .get_reference_args = software_node_get_reference_args >> + .get_reference_args = software_node_get_reference_args, >> + .graph_get_next_endpoint = software_node_graph_get_next_endpoint, >> + .graph_get_remote_endpoint = software_node_graph_get_remote_endpoint, >> + .graph_get_port_parent = software_node_graph_get_port_parent, >> + .graph_parse_endpoint = software_node_graph_parse_endpoint, >> }; >> >> /* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
diff --git a/drivers/base/swnode.c b/drivers/base/swnode.c index 9bd0bb77ad5b..0c7a8d6b9ea8 100644 --- a/drivers/base/swnode.c +++ b/drivers/base/swnode.c @@ -540,6 +540,110 @@ software_node_get_reference_args(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, return 0; } +static struct fwnode_handle * +swnode_graph_find_next_port(const struct fwnode_handle *parent, + struct fwnode_handle *port) +{ + struct fwnode_handle *old = port; + + while ((port = software_node_get_next_child(parent, old))) { + if (!strncmp(to_swnode(port)->node->name, "port", 4)) + return port; + old = port; + } + + return NULL; +} + +static struct fwnode_handle * +software_node_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, + struct fwnode_handle *endpoint) +{ + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); + struct fwnode_handle *old = endpoint; + struct fwnode_handle *parent; + struct fwnode_handle *port; + + if (!swnode) + return NULL; + + if (endpoint) { + port = software_node_get_parent(endpoint); + parent = software_node_get_parent(port); + } else { + parent = software_node_get_named_child_node(fwnode, "ports"); + if (!parent) + parent = software_node_get(&swnode->fwnode); + + port = swnode_graph_find_next_port(parent, NULL); + } + + for (; port; port = swnode_graph_find_next_port(parent, port)) { + endpoint = software_node_get_next_child(port, old); + if (endpoint) { + fwnode_handle_put(port); + break; + } + + /* No more endpoints for that port, so stop passing old */ + old = NULL; + } + + fwnode_handle_put(parent); + + return endpoint; +} + +static struct fwnode_handle * +software_node_graph_get_remote_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode) +{ + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); + const struct software_node_ref_args *ref; + const struct property_entry *prop; + + if (!swnode) + return NULL; + + prop = property_entry_get(swnode->node->properties, "remote-endpoint"); + if (!prop || prop->type != DEV_PROP_REF || prop->is_inline) + return NULL; + + ref = prop->pointer; + + return software_node_get(software_node_fwnode(ref[0].node)); +} + +static struct fwnode_handle * +software_node_graph_get_port_parent(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode) +{ + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); + struct fwnode_handle *parent; + + if (!strcmp(swnode->parent->node->name, "ports")) + parent = &swnode->parent->parent->fwnode; + else + parent = &swnode->parent->fwnode; + + return software_node_get(parent); +} + +static int +software_node_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, + struct fwnode_endpoint *endpoint) +{ + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode); + int ret; + + ret = kstrtou32(swnode->parent->node->name + 4, 10, &endpoint->port); + if (ret) + return ret; + + endpoint->id = swnode->id; + endpoint->local_fwnode = fwnode; + + return 0; +} + static const struct fwnode_operations software_node_ops = { .get = software_node_get, .put = software_node_put, @@ -551,7 +655,11 @@ static const struct fwnode_operations software_node_ops = { .get_parent = software_node_get_parent, .get_next_child_node = software_node_get_next_child, .get_named_child_node = software_node_get_named_child_node, - .get_reference_args = software_node_get_reference_args + .get_reference_args = software_node_get_reference_args, + .graph_get_next_endpoint = software_node_graph_get_next_endpoint, + .graph_get_remote_endpoint = software_node_graph_get_remote_endpoint, + .graph_get_port_parent = software_node_graph_get_port_parent, + .graph_parse_endpoint = software_node_graph_parse_endpoint, }; /* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */