| Message ID | 20201210085505.21575-1-a@unstable.cc (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Awaiting Upstream |
| Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
| Headers | show |
| Series | wireguard: avoid double unlikely() notation when using IS_ERR() | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| netdev/cover_letter | success | Link |
| netdev/fixes_present | success | Link |
| netdev/patch_count | success | Link |
| netdev/tree_selection | success | Guessed tree name to be net-next |
| netdev/subject_prefix | warning | Target tree name not specified in the subject |
| netdev/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| netdev/verify_signedoff | success | Link |
| netdev/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| netdev/build_32bit | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/verify_fixes | success | Link |
| netdev/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 24 lines checked |
| netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/header_inline | success | Link |
| netdev/stable | success | Stable not CCed |
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 9:56 AM Antonio Quartulli <a@unstable.cc> wrote: > > The definition of IS_ERR() already applies the unlikely() notation > when checking the error status of the passed pointer. For this > reason there is no need to have the same notation outside of > IS_ERR() itself. > > Clean up code by removing redundant notation. Thanks for the patch. I can confirm this doesn't change the codgen at all. I've queued this up in wireguard's staging tree, and I'll push it back out as part of the next series. Jason
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireguard/device.c b/drivers/net/wireguard/device.c index a3ed49cd95c3..cd51a2afa28e 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireguard/device.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/device.c @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t wg_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) } else { struct sk_buff *segs = skb_gso_segment(skb, 0); - if (unlikely(IS_ERR(segs))) { + if (IS_ERR(segs)) { ret = PTR_ERR(segs); goto err_peer; } diff --git a/drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c b/drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c index c33e2c81635f..e9c35130846c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static int send4(struct wg_device *wg, struct sk_buff *skb, ip_rt_put(rt); rt = ip_route_output_flow(sock_net(sock), &fl, sock); } - if (unlikely(IS_ERR(rt))) { + if (IS_ERR(rt)) { ret = PTR_ERR(rt); net_dbg_ratelimited("%s: No route to %pISpfsc, error %d\n", wg->dev->name, &endpoint->addr, ret); @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static int send6(struct wg_device *wg, struct sk_buff *skb, } dst = ipv6_stub->ipv6_dst_lookup_flow(sock_net(sock), sock, &fl, NULL); - if (unlikely(IS_ERR(dst))) { + if (IS_ERR(dst)) { ret = PTR_ERR(dst); net_dbg_ratelimited("%s: No route to %pISpfsc, error %d\n", wg->dev->name, &endpoint->addr, ret);
The definition of IS_ERR() already applies the unlikely() notation when checking the error status of the passed pointer. For this reason there is no need to have the same notation outside of IS_ERR() itself. Clean up code by removing redundant notation. Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli <a@unstable.cc> --- drivers/net/wireguard/device.c | 2 +- drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)