Message ID | 20201214123823.3949-1-ionela.voinescu@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | cppc_cpufreq: fix, clarify and improve support | expand |
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:38:19PM +0000, Ionela Voinescu wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm sending v2 of some of the patches at [1] in light of the discussions > at [2]. > > v2: > - Patches 1-3 are trivial rebase on linux next 20201211, with conflicts > fixed after eliminating what previously was "[PATCH 4/8] cppc_cpufreq: > replace per-cpu structures with lists." Therefore, I have kept > Viresh's acks. > > - Patch 4 is a merge between: > - [PATCH 4/8] cppc_cpufreq: replace per-cpu structures with lists > - [PATCH] cppc_cpufreq: optimise memory allocation for HW and NONE > coordination > both found at [1]. > > This functionality was introducing the problem at [2] and it's fixed > in this version by bailing out of driver registration if a _CPC entry > is not found for a CPU. > > Yousaf, it would be great if you can test this and make sure it > matches your expectations. > > Rafael, Viresh if you think this last patch introduces too many > changes, you can skip it for 5.11 which is around the corner and > have more time for review for 5.12. I've added more eyes in the review > list. > > > All patches are based on linux next 20201211 after patch at [3] is > applied. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20201105125524.4409-1-ionela.voinescu@arm.com/#t > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20201210142139.20490-1-yousaf.kaukab@suse.com/ > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20201214120740.10948-1-ionela.voinescu@arm.com/ > > Ionela Voinescu (4): > cppc_cpufreq: use policy->cpu as driver of frequency setting > cppc_cpufreq: clarify support for coordination types > cppc_cpufreq: expose information on frequency domains > cppc_cpufreq: replace per-cpu data array with a list > > .../ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 3 +- > drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 141 ++++++------ > drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 204 ++++++++++-------- > include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 6 +- > 4 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 173 deletions(-) For the whole series: Tested-by: Mian Yousaf Kaukab <ykaukab@suse.de>
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 5:14 PM Mian Yousaf Kaukab <ykaukab@suse.de> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:38:19PM +0000, Ionela Voinescu wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > I'm sending v2 of some of the patches at [1] in light of the discussions > > at [2]. > > > > v2: > > - Patches 1-3 are trivial rebase on linux next 20201211, with conflicts > > fixed after eliminating what previously was "[PATCH 4/8] cppc_cpufreq: > > replace per-cpu structures with lists." Therefore, I have kept > > Viresh's acks. > > > > - Patch 4 is a merge between: > > - [PATCH 4/8] cppc_cpufreq: replace per-cpu structures with lists > > - [PATCH] cppc_cpufreq: optimise memory allocation for HW and NONE > > coordination > > both found at [1]. > > > > This functionality was introducing the problem at [2] and it's fixed > > in this version by bailing out of driver registration if a _CPC entry > > is not found for a CPU. > > > > Yousaf, it would be great if you can test this and make sure it > > matches your expectations. > > > > Rafael, Viresh if you think this last patch introduces too many > > changes, you can skip it for 5.11 which is around the corner and > > have more time for review for 5.12. I've added more eyes in the review > > list. > > > > > > All patches are based on linux next 20201211 after patch at [3] is > > applied. > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20201105125524.4409-1-ionela.voinescu@arm.com/#t > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20201210142139.20490-1-yousaf.kaukab@suse.com/ > > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20201214120740.10948-1-ionela.voinescu@arm.com/ > > > > Ionela Voinescu (4): > > cppc_cpufreq: use policy->cpu as driver of frequency setting > > cppc_cpufreq: clarify support for coordination types > > cppc_cpufreq: expose information on frequency domains > > cppc_cpufreq: replace per-cpu data array with a list > > > > .../ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 3 +- > > drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 141 ++++++------ > > drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 204 ++++++++++-------- > > include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 6 +- > > 4 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 173 deletions(-) > > For the whole series: > Tested-by: Mian Yousaf Kaukab <ykaukab@suse.de> All patches applied as 5.11-rc material, thanks!
On Tuesday 15 Dec 2020 at 19:21:01 (+0100), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 5:14 PM Mian Yousaf Kaukab <ykaukab@suse.de> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:38:19PM +0000, Ionela Voinescu wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > I'm sending v2 of some of the patches at [1] in light of the discussions > > > at [2]. > > > > > > v2: > > > - Patches 1-3 are trivial rebase on linux next 20201211, with conflicts > > > fixed after eliminating what previously was "[PATCH 4/8] cppc_cpufreq: > > > replace per-cpu structures with lists." Therefore, I have kept > > > Viresh's acks. > > > > > > - Patch 4 is a merge between: > > > - [PATCH 4/8] cppc_cpufreq: replace per-cpu structures with lists > > > - [PATCH] cppc_cpufreq: optimise memory allocation for HW and NONE > > > coordination > > > both found at [1]. > > > > > > This functionality was introducing the problem at [2] and it's fixed > > > in this version by bailing out of driver registration if a _CPC entry > > > is not found for a CPU. > > > > > > Yousaf, it would be great if you can test this and make sure it > > > matches your expectations. > > > > > > Rafael, Viresh if you think this last patch introduces too many > > > changes, you can skip it for 5.11 which is around the corner and > > > have more time for review for 5.12. I've added more eyes in the review > > > list. > > > > > > > > > All patches are based on linux next 20201211 after patch at [3] is > > > applied. > > > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20201105125524.4409-1-ionela.voinescu@arm.com/#t > > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20201210142139.20490-1-yousaf.kaukab@suse.com/ > > > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20201214120740.10948-1-ionela.voinescu@arm.com/ > > > > > > Ionela Voinescu (4): > > > cppc_cpufreq: use policy->cpu as driver of frequency setting > > > cppc_cpufreq: clarify support for coordination types > > > cppc_cpufreq: expose information on frequency domains > > > cppc_cpufreq: replace per-cpu data array with a list > > > > > > .../ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 3 +- > > > drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 141 ++++++------ > > > drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 204 ++++++++++-------- > > > include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 6 +- > > > 4 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 173 deletions(-) > > > > For the whole series: > > Tested-by: Mian Yousaf Kaukab <ykaukab@suse.de> > > All patches applied as 5.11-rc material, thanks! Many thanks, guys! Ionela.