@@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ static void fill_remaining_elem_value(struct snd_ctl_elem_value *control,
{
size_t offset = value_sizes[info->type] * info->count;
- offset = (offset + sizeof(u32) - 1) / sizeof(u32);
+ offset = DIV_ROUND_UP(offset, sizeof(u32));
memset32((u32 *)control->value.bytes.data + offset, pattern,
sizeof(control->value) / sizeof(u32) - offset);
}
@@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ static int sanity_check_elem_value(struct snd_card *card,
/* check whether the remaining area kept untouched */
offset = value_sizes[info->type] * info->count;
- offset = (offset + sizeof(u32) - 1) / sizeof(u32);
+ offset = DIV_ROUND_UP(offset, sizeof(u32));
p = (u32 *)control->value.bytes.data + offset;
for (; offset < sizeof(control->value) / sizeof(u32); offset++, p++) {
if (*p != pattern) {
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ int snd_seq_event_dup(struct snd_seq_pool *pool, struct snd_seq_event *event,
extlen = 0;
if (snd_seq_ev_is_variable(event)) {
extlen = event->data.ext.len & ~SNDRV_SEQ_EXT_MASK;
- ncells = (extlen + sizeof(struct snd_seq_event) - 1) / sizeof(struct snd_seq_event);
+ ncells = DIV_ROUND_UP(extlen, sizeof(struct snd_seq_event));
}
if (ncells >= pool->total_elements)
return -ENOMEM;
Use DIV_ROUND_UP() instead of open-coding it. This documents intent and makes it more clear what is going on for the casual reviewer. Generated using the following the Coccinelle semantic patch. // <smpl> @@ expression x, y; @@ -(((x) + (y) - 1) / (y)) +DIV_ROUND_UP(x, y) // </smpl> Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> --- sound/core/control.c | 4 ++-- sound/core/seq/seq_memory.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)