@@ -35,8 +35,9 @@ static DECLARE_RWSEM(asymmetric_key_parsers_sem);
/**
* find_asymmetric_key - Find a key by ID.
* @keyring: The keys to search.
- * @id_0: The first ID to look for or NULL.
- * @id_1: The second ID to look for or NULL.
+ * @id_0: The primary ID to look for or NULL.
+ * @id_1: The first fallback ID to look for or NULL.
+ * @id_2: The second fallback ID to look for or NULL.
* @partial: Use partial match if true, exact if false.
*
* Find a key in the given keyring by identifier. The preferred identifier is
@@ -46,6 +47,7 @@ static DECLARE_RWSEM(asymmetric_key_parsers_sem);
struct key *find_asymmetric_key(struct key *keyring,
const struct asymmetric_key_id *id_0,
const struct asymmetric_key_id *id_1,
+ const struct asymmetric_key_id *id_2,
bool partial)
{
struct key *key;
@@ -54,22 +56,30 @@ struct key *find_asymmetric_key(struct key *keyring,
char *req, *p;
int len;
- BUG_ON(!id_0 && !id_1);
+ BUG_ON(!id_0 && !id_1 && !id_2);
if (id_0) {
lookup = id_0->data;
len = id_0->len;
- } else {
+ } else if (id_1) {
lookup = id_1->data;
len = id_1->len;
+ } else {
+ lookup = id_2->data;
+ len = id_2->len;
}
/* Construct an identifier "id:<keyid>". */
- p = req = kmalloc(2 + 1 + len * 2 + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+ p = req = kmalloc(4 + 1 + len * 2 + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!req)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- if (partial) {
+ if (!id_0 && !id_1) {
+ *p++ = 'n';
+ *p++ = 'a';
+ *p++ = 'm';
+ *p++ = 'e';
+ } else if (partial) {
*p++ = 'i';
*p++ = 'd';
} else {
@@ -183,8 +193,8 @@ bool asymmetric_key_id_partial(const struct asymmetric_key_id *kid1,
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(asymmetric_key_id_partial);
/**
- * asymmetric_match_key_ids - Search asymmetric key IDs
- * @kids: The list of key IDs to check
+ * asymmetric_match_key_ids - Search asymmetric key IDs 1 & 2
+ * @kids: The pair of key IDs to check
* @match_id: The key ID we're looking for
* @match: The match function to use
*/
@@ -198,7 +208,7 @@ static bool asymmetric_match_key_ids(
if (!kids || !match_id)
return false;
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kids->id); i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
if (match(kids->id[i], match_id))
return true;
return false;
@@ -242,7 +252,7 @@ struct asymmetric_key_id *asymmetric_key_hex_to_key_id(const char *id)
}
/*
- * Match asymmetric keys by an exact match on an ID.
+ * Match asymmetric keys by an exact match on one of the first two IDs.
*/
static bool asymmetric_key_cmp(const struct key *key,
const struct key_match_data *match_data)
@@ -255,7 +265,7 @@ static bool asymmetric_key_cmp(const struct key *key,
}
/*
- * Match asymmetric keys by a partial match on an IDs.
+ * Match asymmetric keys by a partial match on one of the first two IDs.
*/
static bool asymmetric_key_cmp_partial(const struct key *key,
const struct key_match_data *match_data)
@@ -267,6 +277,18 @@ static bool asymmetric_key_cmp_partial(const struct key *key,
asymmetric_key_id_partial);
}
+/*
+ * Match asymmetric keys by an exact match on the third IDs.
+ */
+static bool asymmetric_key_cmp_name(const struct key *key,
+ const struct key_match_data *match_data)
+{
+ const struct asymmetric_key_ids *kids = asymmetric_key_ids(key);
+ const struct asymmetric_key_id *match_id = match_data->preparsed;
+
+ return kids && asymmetric_key_id_same(kids->id[2], match_id);
+}
+
/*
* Preparse the match criterion. If we don't set lookup_type and cmp,
* the default will be an exact match on the key description.
@@ -274,8 +296,9 @@ static bool asymmetric_key_cmp_partial(const struct key *key,
* There are some specifiers for matching key IDs rather than by the key
* description:
*
- * "id:<id>" - find a key by partial match on any available ID
- * "ex:<id>" - find a key by exact match on any available ID
+ * "id:<id>" - find a key by partial match on one of the first two IDs
+ * "ex:<id>" - find a key by exact match on one of the first two IDs
+ * "name:<id>" - find a key by exact match on the third ID
*
* These have to be searched by iteration rather than by direct lookup because
* the key is hashed according to its description.
@@ -299,6 +322,13 @@ static int asymmetric_key_match_preparse(struct key_match_data *match_data)
spec[1] == 'x' &&
spec[2] == ':') {
id = spec + 3;
+ } else if (spec[0] == 'n' &&
+ spec[1] == 'a' &&
+ spec[2] == 'm' &&
+ spec[3] == 'e' &&
+ spec[4] == ':') {
+ id = spec + 5;
+ cmp = asymmetric_key_cmp_name;
} else {
goto default_match;
}
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static int pkcs7_validate_trust_one(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7,
* keys.
*/
key = find_asymmetric_key(trust_keyring,
- x509->id, x509->skid, false);
+ x509->id, x509->skid, NULL, false);
if (!IS_ERR(key)) {
/* One of the X.509 certificates in the PKCS#7 message
* is apparently the same as one we already trust.
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static int pkcs7_validate_trust_one(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7,
key = find_asymmetric_key(trust_keyring,
last->sig->auth_ids[0],
last->sig->auth_ids[1],
- false);
+ NULL, false);
if (!IS_ERR(key)) {
x509 = last;
pr_devel("sinfo %u: Root cert %u signer is key %x\n",
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static int pkcs7_validate_trust_one(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7,
* the signed info directly.
*/
key = find_asymmetric_key(trust_keyring,
- sinfo->sig->auth_ids[0], NULL, false);
+ sinfo->sig->auth_ids[0], NULL, NULL, false);
if (!IS_ERR(key)) {
pr_devel("sinfo %u: Direct signer is key %x\n",
sinfo->index, key_serial(key));
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ int restrict_link_by_signature(struct key *dest_keyring,
sig = payload->data[asym_auth];
if (!sig)
return -ENOPKG;
- if (!sig->auth_ids[0] && !sig->auth_ids[1])
+ if (!sig->auth_ids[0] && !sig->auth_ids[1] && !sig->auth_ids[2])
return -ENOKEY;
if (ca_keyid && !asymmetric_key_id_partial(sig->auth_ids[1], ca_keyid))
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ int restrict_link_by_signature(struct key *dest_keyring,
/* See if we have a key that signed this one. */
key = find_asymmetric_key(trust_keyring,
sig->auth_ids[0], sig->auth_ids[1],
- false);
+ sig->auth_ids[2], false);
if (IS_ERR(key))
return -ENOKEY;
@@ -108,11 +108,11 @@ int restrict_link_by_signature(struct key *dest_keyring,
return ret;
}
-static bool match_either_id(const struct asymmetric_key_ids *pair,
+static bool match_either_id(const struct asymmetric_key_id **pair,
const struct asymmetric_key_id *single)
{
- return (asymmetric_key_id_same(pair->id[0], single) ||
- asymmetric_key_id_same(pair->id[1], single));
+ return (asymmetric_key_id_same(pair[0], single) ||
+ asymmetric_key_id_same(pair[1], single));
}
static int key_or_keyring_common(struct key *dest_keyring,
@@ -140,20 +140,22 @@ static int key_or_keyring_common(struct key *dest_keyring,
sig = payload->data[asym_auth];
if (!sig)
return -ENOPKG;
- if (!sig->auth_ids[0] && !sig->auth_ids[1])
+ if (!sig->auth_ids[0] && !sig->auth_ids[1] && !sig->auth_ids[2])
return -ENOKEY;
if (trusted) {
if (trusted->type == &key_type_keyring) {
/* See if we have a key that signed this one. */
key = find_asymmetric_key(trusted, sig->auth_ids[0],
- sig->auth_ids[1], false);
+ sig->auth_ids[1],
+ sig->auth_ids[2], false);
if (IS_ERR(key))
key = NULL;
} else if (trusted->type == &key_type_asymmetric) {
- const struct asymmetric_key_ids *signer_ids;
+ const struct asymmetric_key_id **signer_ids;
- signer_ids = asymmetric_key_ids(trusted);
+ signer_ids = (const struct asymmetric_key_id **)
+ asymmetric_key_ids(trusted)->id;
/*
* The auth_ids come from the candidate key (the
@@ -164,22 +166,29 @@ static int key_or_keyring_common(struct key *dest_keyring,
* The signer_ids are identifiers for the
* signing key specified for dest_keyring.
*
- * The first auth_id is the preferred id, and
- * the second is the fallback. If only one
- * auth_id is present, it may match against
- * either signer_id. If two auth_ids are
- * present, the first auth_id must match one
- * signer_id and the second auth_id must match
- * the second signer_id.
+ * The first auth_id is the preferred id, 2nd and
+ * 3rd are the fallbacks. If excatly one of
+ * auth_ids[0] and auth_ids[1] is present, it may
+ * match either signer_ids[0] or signed_ids[1].
+ * If both are present the first one may match
+ * either signed_id but the second one must match
+ * the second signer_id. If neither of them is
+ * available, auth_ids[2] is matched against
+ * signer_ids[2] as a fallback.
*/
- if (!sig->auth_ids[0] || !sig->auth_ids[1]) {
+ if (!sig->auth_ids[0] && !sig->auth_ids[1]) {
+ if (asymmetric_key_id_same(signer_ids[2],
+ sig->auth_ids[2]))
+ key = __key_get(trusted);
+
+ } else if (!sig->auth_ids[0] || !sig->auth_ids[1]) {
const struct asymmetric_key_id *auth_id;
auth_id = sig->auth_ids[0] ?: sig->auth_ids[1];
if (match_either_id(signer_ids, auth_id))
key = __key_get(trusted);
- } else if (asymmetric_key_id_same(signer_ids->id[1],
+ } else if (asymmetric_key_id_same(signer_ids[1],
sig->auth_ids[1]) &&
match_either_id(signer_ids,
sig->auth_ids[0])) {
@@ -193,7 +202,8 @@ static int key_or_keyring_common(struct key *dest_keyring,
if (check_dest && !key) {
/* See if the destination has a key that signed this one. */
key = find_asymmetric_key(dest_keyring, sig->auth_ids[0],
- sig->auth_ids[1], false);
+ sig->auth_ids[1], sig->auth_ids[2],
+ false);
if (IS_ERR(key))
key = NULL;
}
@@ -415,8 +415,18 @@ int x509_note_issuer(void *context, size_t hdrlen,
const void *value, size_t vlen)
{
struct x509_parse_context *ctx = context;
+ struct asymmetric_key_id *kid;
+
ctx->cert->raw_issuer = value;
ctx->cert->raw_issuer_size = vlen;
+
+ if (!ctx->cert->sig->auth_ids[2]) {
+ kid = asymmetric_key_generate_id(value, vlen, "", 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(kid))
+ return PTR_ERR(kid);
+ ctx->cert->sig->auth_ids[2] = kid;
+ }
+
return x509_fabricate_name(ctx, hdrlen, tag, &ctx->cert->issuer, vlen);
}
@@ -221,6 +221,13 @@ static int x509_key_preparse(struct key_preparsed_payload *prep)
goto error_free_desc;
kids->id[0] = cert->id;
kids->id[1] = cert->skid;
+ kids->id[2] = asymmetric_key_generate_id(cert->raw_subject,
+ cert->raw_subject_size,
+ "", 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(kids->id[2])) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(kids->id[2]);
+ goto error_free_kids;
+ }
/* We're pinning the module by being linked against it */
__module_get(public_key_subtype.owner);
@@ -237,8 +244,11 @@ static int x509_key_preparse(struct key_preparsed_payload *prep)
cert->skid = NULL;
cert->sig = NULL;
desc = NULL;
+ kids = NULL;
ret = 0;
+error_free_kids:
+ kfree(kids);
error_free_desc:
kfree(desc);
error_free_cert:
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ extern void public_key_free(struct public_key *key);
* Public key cryptography signature data
*/
struct public_key_signature {
- struct asymmetric_key_id *auth_ids[2];
+ struct asymmetric_key_id *auth_ids[3];
u8 *s; /* Signature */
u32 s_size; /* Number of bytes in signature */
u8 *digest;
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ struct asymmetric_key_id {
};
struct asymmetric_key_ids {
- void *id[2];
+ void *id[3];
};
extern bool asymmetric_key_id_same(const struct asymmetric_key_id *kid1,
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ const struct asymmetric_key_ids *asymmetric_key_ids(const struct key *key)
extern struct key *find_asymmetric_key(struct key *keyring,
const struct asymmetric_key_id *id_0,
const struct asymmetric_key_id *id_1,
+ const struct asymmetric_key_id *id_2,
bool partial);
/*
There are non-root X.509 v3 certificates in use there that contain no Authority Key Identifier extension (RFC5280 section 4.2.1.1) which the kernel asymmetric key code relies on for any lookup and verification. Such certificates are generated by openssl if you don't explicitly tell it to include the extension. Looking at RFC5280 4.2.1.1 it says: "This extension is used where an issuer has multiple signing keys [...]" making it sound like the extension is optional if the issuer uses only one signing key. It also says: "The keyIdentifier field of the authorityKeyIdentifier extension MUST be included in all certificates [...]" now making it sound like it's mandatory for everyone. It doesn't say it as explicitly as it does for the Subject Key Identifier extension though (4.2.1.2). Openssl offers no code comments explaining why neither of the two is included by default. It marks a certificate as V3 as soon as *any* extension is included. In this patch I add lookups by just the Distinguished Names in the certificate to handle this, I believe this is what (2) in the struct asymmetric_key_id (include/keys/asymmetric-type.h) talks about. I add a third key ID in asymmetric_key_ids and I attempt to keep the logic intact whenever either of the first two IDs is present in the subject key (the ones derived from the AKID in the case of the the x509 public key subtype.) Lookups are still unambiguous provided that the CAs respect the condition that the AKID may only be omitted if they use a single signing key. I didn't apply the third ID logic to the certificate chain veritification in pkcs7_verify.c, the AKID extensions is still required there. Signed-off-by: Andrew Zaborowski <andrew.zaborowski@intel.com> --- crypto/asymmetric_keys/asymmetric_type.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++------ crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_trust.c | 6 +-- crypto/asymmetric_keys/restrict.c | 48 +++++++++++-------- crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c | 10 ++++ crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c | 10 ++++ include/crypto/public_key.h | 2 +- include/keys/asymmetric-type.h | 3 +- 7 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)