Message ID | 20210120125202.2187358-1-mkl@pengutronix.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 535d31593f5951f2cd344df7cb618ca48f67393f |
Headers | show |
Series | pull-request: can 2021-01-20 | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/tree_selection | success | Series ignored based on subject |
On 1/20/21 6:19 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >> this is a pull request of 3 patches for net/master. >> >> All three patches are by Vincent Mailhol and fix a potential use after free bug >> in the CAN device infrastructure, the vxcan driver, and the peak_usk driver. In >> the TX-path the skb is used to read from after it was passed to the networking >> stack with netif_rx_ni(). > > Pulled, thanks. > > Seems like the PR didn't show up in patchwork at all :S Hopefully I can > still pull reight manually without the scripts :) Fingers crossed. :D Today I noticed a lag of >4h on vger.kernel.org. Even this mail of yours hasn't made it to the linux-can list, yet. It's 3h delayed. >> Note: Patch 1/3 touches "drivers/net/can/dev.c". In net-next/master this file >> has been moved to drivers/net/can/dev/dev.c [1] and parts of it have been >> transfered into separate files. This may result in a merge conflict. Please >> carry this patch forward, the change is rather simple. Drop us a note if >> needed. Are any actions needed with regards to linux-next? > > Thanks for the note, I'm sending the PR to Linus now, so I think > linux-next may never see the the conflict. thanks, Marc
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 21:20:13 +0100 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 1/20/21 6:19 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > >> this is a pull request of 3 patches for net/master. > >> > >> All three patches are by Vincent Mailhol and fix a potential use after free bug > >> in the CAN device infrastructure, the vxcan driver, and the peak_usk driver. In > >> the TX-path the skb is used to read from after it was passed to the networking > >> stack with netif_rx_ni(). > > > > Pulled, thanks. > > > > Seems like the PR didn't show up in patchwork at all :S Hopefully I can > > still pull reight manually without the scripts :) > > Fingers crossed. :D > > Today I noticed a lag of >4h on vger.kernel.org. Even this mail of yours hasn't > made it to the linux-can list, yet. It's 3h delayed. It's been reported but it's unclear what's causing this one :( > >> Note: Patch 1/3 touches "drivers/net/can/dev.c". In net-next/master this file > >> has been moved to drivers/net/can/dev/dev.c [1] and parts of it have been > >> transfered into separate files. This may result in a merge conflict. Please > >> carry this patch forward, the change is rather simple. Drop us a note if > >> needed. Are any actions needed with regards to linux-next? > > > > Thanks for the note, I'm sending the PR to Linus now, so I think > > linux-next may never see the the conflict. The merge has been done now, could you double check?
Hello: This pull request was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master): On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:51:59 +0100 you wrote: > Hello Jakub, hello David, > > this is a pull request of 3 patches for net/master. > > All three patches are by Vincent Mailhol and fix a potential use after free bug > in the CAN device infrastructure, the vxcan driver, and the peak_usk driver. In > the TX-path the skb is used to read from after it was passed to the networking > stack with netif_rx_ni(). > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - pull-request: can 2021-01-20 https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/535d31593f59 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
On 1/20/21 9:36 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >>>> Note: Patch 1/3 touches "drivers/net/can/dev.c". In net-next/master this file >>>> has been moved to drivers/net/can/dev/dev.c [1] and parts of it have been >>>> transfered into separate files. This may result in a merge conflict. Please >>>> carry this patch forward, the change is rather simple. Drop us a note if >>>> needed. Are any actions needed with regards to linux-next? >>> >>> Thanks for the note, I'm sending the PR to Linus now, so I think >>> linux-next may never see the the conflict. > > The merge has been done now, could you double check? Looks good! Thanks, Marc