Message ID | 20210123154056.48234-1-mirucam@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Finish converting git bisect to C part 3 | expand |
Miriam Rubio <mirucam@gmail.com> writes: > These patches correspond to a third part of patch series > of Outreachy project "Finish converting `git bisect` from shell to C" > started by Pranit Bauva and Tanushree Tumane > (https://public-inbox.org/git/pull.117.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com) and > continued by me. > > This third part is formed by reimplementations of some `git bisect` > subcommands and removal of some temporary subcommands. > > These patch series emails were generated from: > https://gitlab.com/mirucam/git/commits/git-bisect-work-part3_v2. Unfortunately, with this series in the 'seen' branch, the CI jobs seem to fail. cf. https://github.com/git/git/runs/1766239699?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:814
Hi Junio, El mar, 26 ene 2021 a las 2:58, Junio C Hamano (<gitster@pobox.com>) escribió: > > Miriam Rubio <mirucam@gmail.com> writes: > > > These patches correspond to a third part of patch series > > of Outreachy project "Finish converting `git bisect` from shell to C" > > started by Pranit Bauva and Tanushree Tumane > > (https://public-inbox.org/git/pull.117.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com) and > > continued by me. > > > > This third part is formed by reimplementations of some `git bisect` > > subcommands and removal of some temporary subcommands. > > > > These patch series emails were generated from: > > https://gitlab.com/mirucam/git/commits/git-bisect-work-part3_v2. > > Unfortunately, with this series in the 'seen' branch, the CI jobs > seem to fail. With the last patch series sent: https://public-inbox.org/git/20210125191710.45161-1-mirucam@gmail.com/ (branch: https://gitlab.com/mirucam/git/commits/git-bisect-work-part3_v3) all tests pass (executed with: prove -j5 --shuffle t[0-9]*.sh): -------- All tests successful. Files=916, Tests=22661, 1628 wallclock secs ( 7.93 usr 3.16 sys + 1106.15 cusr 1387.58 csys = 2504.82 CPU) Result: PASS ---------- > > cf. > https://github.com/git/git/runs/1766239699?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:814 I have seen that is "t3415-rebase-autosquash.sh" the test that fails in CI jobs. I have also executed it independently with no errors: ./t3415-rebase-autosquash.sh ok 1 - setup ok 2 - auto fixup (option) ok 3 - auto fixup (config) ok 4 - auto squash (option) ok 5 - auto squash (config) ok 6 - misspelled auto squash ok 7 - auto squash that matches 2 commits ok 8 - auto squash that matches a commit after the squash ok 9 - auto squash that matches a sha1 ok 10 - auto squash that matches longer sha1 ok 11 - use commit --fixup ok 12 - use commit --squash ok 13 - fixup! fixup! ok 14 - fixup! squash! ok 15 - squash! squash! ok 16 - squash! fixup! ok 17 - autosquash with custom inst format ok 18 - autosquash with empty custom instructionFormat ok 19 - autosquash with multiple empty patches ok 20 - extra spaces after fixup! ok 21 - wrapped original subject ok 22 - abort last squash ok 23 - fixup a fixup # passed all 23 test(s) 1..23 If I am missing something or I should do any other test please tell me, thank you, Miriam.
"Miriam R." <mirucam@gmail.com> writes: >> cf. >> https://github.com/git/git/runs/1766239699?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:814 > > I have seen that is "t3415-rebase-autosquash.sh" the test that fails in CI jobs. Sorry, a false alarm. This I think was caused by another topic, cm/rebase-i, and not the bisect topic.
El mar, 26 ene 2021 a las 20:12, Junio C Hamano (<gitster@pobox.com>) escribió: > > "Miriam R." <mirucam@gmail.com> writes: > > >> cf. > >> https://github.com/git/git/runs/1766239699?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:814 > > > > I have seen that is "t3415-rebase-autosquash.sh" the test that fails in CI jobs. > > Sorry, a false alarm. This I think was caused by another topic, > cm/rebase-i, and not the bisect topic. > Ok. Best, Miriam.