Message ID | 20210127071020.18052-1-adam@adamharvey.name (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | cifs: ignore the noauto option if it is provided | expand |
Hi Adam, Adam Harvey <adam@adamharvey.name> writes: > In 24e0a1eff9e2, the noauto option was missed when migrating to the new > mount API. As a result, users with noauto in their fstab mount options > are now unable to mount cifs filesystems, as they'll receive an "Unknown > parameter" error. > > This restores the old behaviour of ignoring noauto if it's given. I was looking at other fs code and it seems no one explicitely parses auto/noauto. Any idea why? This looks like it could be handled somewhere else. Also I would have expected fsparam_flag_no("auto", Opt_ignore) to allow for both auto and noauto. Cheers,
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 02:56, Aurélien Aptel <aaptel@suse.com> wrote: > > Hi Adam, > > Adam Harvey <adam@adamharvey.name> writes: > > In 24e0a1eff9e2, the noauto option was missed when migrating to the new > > mount API. As a result, users with noauto in their fstab mount options > > are now unable to mount cifs filesystems, as they'll receive an "Unknown > > parameter" error. > > > > This restores the old behaviour of ignoring noauto if it's given. > > I was looking at other fs code and it seems no one explicitely parses > auto/noauto. Any idea why? This looks like it could be handled somewhere > else. Honestly, I have no idea. I'm just a regular user trying to get his music share to mount on 5.11-rc5. :) > Also I would have expected fsparam_flag_no("auto", Opt_ignore) to allow > for both auto and noauto. Good catch! I misread the fstab manpage last night and thought there wasn't a matching "auto". I'll send an updated patch that supports both. Thanks, Adam
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 12:06, Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com> wrote:
> I didn't see anything logged in dmesg (when I tried it on 5.11-rc today) indicating it was a problem (it still tried the mount).Maybe it is stripped out by user space?
I did get a dmesg message when I tried it on 5.11.0-rc5. Here's my setup:
In /etc/fstab:
//10.42.84.1/shared /external cifs
noauto,user,rw,guest,uid=1000,gid=1000,vers=1.0 0 0
When I /mount external (with cifs-utils 6.11 installed, should that
matter), I get this in dmesg:
Jan 26 21:11:17 nosecam kernel: cifs: Unknown parameter 'noauto'
And the mount fails.
Adam
diff --git a/fs/cifs/fs_context.c b/fs/cifs/fs_context.c index 076bcadc756a..0edde5c66985 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/fs_context.c +++ b/fs/cifs/fs_context.c @@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ const struct fs_parameter_spec smb3_fs_parameters[] = { fsparam_flag("noatime", Opt_ignore), fsparam_flag("relatime", Opt_ignore), fsparam_flag("_netdev", Opt_ignore), + fsparam_flag("noauto", Opt_ignore), fsparam_flag_no("suid", Opt_ignore), fsparam_flag_no("exec", Opt_ignore), fsparam_flag_no("dev", Opt_ignore),
In 24e0a1eff9e2, the noauto option was missed when migrating to the new mount API. As a result, users with noauto in their fstab mount options are now unable to mount cifs filesystems, as they'll receive an "Unknown parameter" error. This restores the old behaviour of ignoring noauto if it's given. Fixes: 24e0a1eff9e2 ("cifs: switch to new mount api") Signed-off-by: Adam Harvey <adam@adamharvey.name> --- fs/cifs/fs_context.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)