Message ID | 20210128112028.64831-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | mm/hugetlb: Fix some comment typos | expand |
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 4:50 PM Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> wrote: > > Fix typos sasitfy to satisfy, reservtion to reservation, hugegpage to > hugepage and uniprocesor to uniprocessor in comments. > > Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> > --- > include/linux/hugetlb.h | 2 +- > mm/hugetlb.c | 6 +++--- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h > index ef5b144b8aac..95a5a239c8f2 100644 > --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h > +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ struct hugepage_subpool { > struct hstate *hstate; > long min_hpages; /* Minimum huge pages or -1 if no minimum. */ > long rsv_hpages; /* Pages reserved against global pool to */ > - /* sasitfy minimum size. */ > + /* satisfy minimum size. */ > }; > > struct resv_map { > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c > index 53ea65d1c5ab..c42c61c2653e 100644 > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c > @@ -1444,7 +1444,7 @@ static void __free_huge_page(struct page *page) > * reservation. If the page was associated with a subpool, there > * would have been a page reserved in the subpool before allocation > * via hugepage_subpool_get_pages(). Since we are 'restoring' the > - * reservtion, do not call hugepage_subpool_put_pages() as this will > + * reservation, do not call hugepage_subpool_put_pages() as this will > * remove the reserved page from the subpool. > */ > if (!restore_reserve) { > @@ -3715,7 +3715,7 @@ static unsigned long hugetlb_vm_op_pagesize(struct vm_area_struct *vma) > /* > * We cannot handle pagefaults against hugetlb pages at all. They cause > * handle_mm_fault() to try to instantiate regular-sized pages in the > - * hugegpage VMA. do_page_fault() is supposed to trap this, so BUG is we get > + * hugepage VMA. do_page_fault() is supposed to trap this, so BUG is we get > * this far. > */ > static vm_fault_t hugetlb_vm_op_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf) > @@ -4513,7 +4513,7 @@ u32 hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t idx) > } > #else > /* > - * For uniprocesor systems we always use a single mutex, so just > + * For uniprocessor systems we always use a single mutex, so just > * return 0 and avoid the hashing overhead. > */ > u32 hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t idx) > -- > 2.19.1 > >
diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h index ef5b144b8aac..95a5a239c8f2 100644 --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ struct hugepage_subpool { struct hstate *hstate; long min_hpages; /* Minimum huge pages or -1 if no minimum. */ long rsv_hpages; /* Pages reserved against global pool to */ - /* sasitfy minimum size. */ + /* satisfy minimum size. */ }; struct resv_map { diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c index 53ea65d1c5ab..c42c61c2653e 100644 --- a/mm/hugetlb.c +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c @@ -1444,7 +1444,7 @@ static void __free_huge_page(struct page *page) * reservation. If the page was associated with a subpool, there * would have been a page reserved in the subpool before allocation * via hugepage_subpool_get_pages(). Since we are 'restoring' the - * reservtion, do not call hugepage_subpool_put_pages() as this will + * reservation, do not call hugepage_subpool_put_pages() as this will * remove the reserved page from the subpool. */ if (!restore_reserve) { @@ -3715,7 +3715,7 @@ static unsigned long hugetlb_vm_op_pagesize(struct vm_area_struct *vma) /* * We cannot handle pagefaults against hugetlb pages at all. They cause * handle_mm_fault() to try to instantiate regular-sized pages in the - * hugegpage VMA. do_page_fault() is supposed to trap this, so BUG is we get + * hugepage VMA. do_page_fault() is supposed to trap this, so BUG is we get * this far. */ static vm_fault_t hugetlb_vm_op_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf) @@ -4513,7 +4513,7 @@ u32 hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t idx) } #else /* - * For uniprocesor systems we always use a single mutex, so just + * For uniprocessor systems we always use a single mutex, so just * return 0 and avoid the hashing overhead. */ u32 hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t idx)
Fix typos sasitfy to satisfy, reservtion to reservation, hugegpage to hugepage and uniprocesor to uniprocessor in comments. Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> --- include/linux/hugetlb.h | 2 +- mm/hugetlb.c | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)