| Message ID | 20210129090030.26976-1-nicolas.ferre@microchip.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 4940b9919119906ba37b3f00611fd5e9be587946 |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [GIT,PULL] ARM: at91: soc for 5.12 #2 | expand |
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 10:00:30 +0100, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com wrote: > Arnd, Olof, > > Here is the second batch of soc changes for 5.12. Actually first batch was > consumed as "fixes" following our discussion here: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/CAK8P3a1v=_4E40cZjZ-ff7vs84XE9XaxwdoGW7Rf+LYiA+TCTw@mail.gmail.com/ > Note that v5.11-rc1 is the root of this Pull-Request so the 2 first patches are > the ones already taken as fixes. > > [...] Merged into arm/drivers, thanks! merge commit: 4940b9919119906ba37b3f00611fd5e9be587946 Arnd
Hello: This pull request was applied to soc/soc.git (refs/heads/for-next): On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 10:00:30 +0100 you wrote: > From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> > > Arnd, Olof, > > Here is the second batch of soc changes for 5.12. Actually first batch was > consumed as "fixes" following our discussion here: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/CAK8P3a1v=_4E40cZjZ-ff7vs84XE9XaxwdoGW7Rf+LYiA+TCTw@mail.gmail.com/ > Note that v5.11-rc1 is the root of this Pull-Request so the 2 first patches are > the ones already taken as fixes. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [GIT,PULL] ARM: at91: soc for 5.12 #2 https://git.kernel.org/soc/soc/c/4940b9919119 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> Arnd, Olof, Here is the second batch of soc changes for 5.12. Actually first batch was consumed as "fixes" following our discussion here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/CAK8P3a1v=_4E40cZjZ-ff7vs84XE9XaxwdoGW7Rf+LYiA+TCTw@mail.gmail.com/ Note that v5.11-rc1 is the root of this Pull-Request so the 2 first patches are the ones already taken as fixes. The fixes are now in Linus' tree and this branch is merged in linux-next for an handful of days. However, tell me if you'd prefer that I merge the arm-soc "arm/fixes" branch before adding the at91 soc patches on top. Thanks, best regards, Nicolas The following changes since commit 5c8fe583cce542aa0b84adc939ce85293de36e5e: Linux 5.11-rc1 (2020-12-27 15:30:22 -0800) are available in the Git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/at91/linux.git tags/at91-soc-5.12-2 for you to fetch changes up to cd9168b4377932a6494d464db1ddd3f63e41fce3: drivers: soc: atmel: add spdx license identifier (2021-01-26 11:25:08 +0100) ---------------------------------------------------------------- AT91 SoC for 5.12 #2 - addition of SAMA7G5 identification to soc.c driver - enhancements to this soc.c driver ---------------------------------------------------------------- Claudiu Beznea (7): drivers: soc: atmel: add null entry at the end of at91_soc_allowed_list[] drivers: soc: atmel: use GENMASK drivers: soc: atmel: fix "__initconst should be placed after socs[]" warning drivers: soc: atmel: add per soc id and version match masks dt-bindings: atmel-sysreg: add "microchip, sama7g5-chipid" drivers: soc: atmel: add support for sama7g5 drivers: soc: atmel: add spdx license identifier Sudeep Holla (1): drivers: soc: atmel: Avoid calling at91_soc_init on non AT91 SoCs .../devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt | 2 +- drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c | 240 ++++++++++++++------- drivers/soc/atmel/soc.h | 19 +- 3 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)