diff mbox series

Bluetooth: af_bluetooth: checkpatch: fix indentation and alignment

Message ID 20210127150520.3459346-1-xorphitus@fastmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Bluetooth: af_bluetooth: checkpatch: fix indentation and alignment | expand

Commit Message

Tomoyuki Matsushita Jan. 27, 2021, 3:05 p.m. UTC
Signed-off-by: Tomoyuki Matsushita <xorphitus@fastmail.com>
---
 net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Comments

bluez.test.bot@gmail.com Jan. 27, 2021, 4:15 p.m. UTC | #1
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!

Dear submitter,

Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=423011

---Test result---

##############################
    Test: CheckPatch - PASS
    

    ##############################
    Test: CheckGitLint - FAIL
    workflow: Add workflow files for ci
1: T1 Title exceeds max length (92>72): "Merge c32d33d306459f1f1f0f7230d82d304eae2f0010 into 8dbf268701d36b2408d92423bd65f41e5699b541"
3: B6 Body message is missing

Bluetooth: af_bluetooth: checkpatch: fix indentation and alignment
1: T1 Title exceeds max length (92>72): "Merge c32d33d306459f1f1f0f7230d82d304eae2f0010 into 8dbf268701d36b2408d92423bd65f41e5699b541"
3: B6 Body message is missing


    ##############################
    Test: CheckBuildK - PASS
    

    ##############################
    Test: CheckTestRunner: Setup - PASS
    

    ##############################
    Test: CheckTestRunner: l2cap-tester - PASS
    Total: 40, Passed: 34 (85.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 6

    ##############################
    Test: CheckTestRunner: bnep-tester - PASS
    Total: 1, Passed: 1 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

    ##############################
    Test: CheckTestRunner: mgmt-tester - PASS
    Total: 416, Passed: 402 (96.6%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 14

    ##############################
    Test: CheckTestRunner: rfcomm-tester - PASS
    Total: 9, Passed: 9 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

    ##############################
    Test: CheckTestRunner: sco-tester - PASS
    Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

    ##############################
    Test: CheckTestRunner: smp-tester - PASS
    Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

    ##############################
    Test: CheckTestRunner: userchan-tester - PASS
    Total: 3, Passed: 3 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

    

---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
Joe Perches Jan. 27, 2021, 8:03 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 00:05 +0900, Tomoyuki Matsushita wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Tomoyuki Matsushita <xorphitus@fastmail.com>

checkpatch is pretty stupid so whatever it recommends needs to
be looked at carefully by a human and fixed appropriately.

> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c b/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c
[]
> @@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ __poll_t bt_sock_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
>  		mask |= EPOLLHUP;
>  
> 
>  	if (sk->sk_state == BT_CONNECT ||
> -			sk->sk_state == BT_CONNECT2 ||
> +	    sk->sk_state == BT_CONNECT2 ||
>  			sk->sk_state == BT_CONFIG)

checkpatch only warns on the alignment of the second line of multi-line statements.
Please make sure all lines of the multi-line statements are aligned.
bluez.test.bot@gmail.com Jan. 27, 2021, 10:12 p.m. UTC | #3
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!

Dear submitter,

Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=423011

---Test result---

##############################
    Test: CheckPatch - FAIL
    Bluetooth: af_bluetooth: checkpatch: fix indentation and alignment
WARNING: Missing commit description - Add an appropriate one

total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 74 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

"[PATCH] Bluetooth: af_bluetooth: checkpatch: fix indentation and" has style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.


    ##############################
    Test: CheckGitLint - PASS
    

    ##############################
    Test: CheckBuildK - PASS
    

    ##############################
    Test: CheckTestRunner: Setup - PASS
    

    ##############################
    Test: CheckTestRunner: l2cap-tester - PASS
    Total: 40, Passed: 34 (85.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 6

    ##############################
    Test: CheckTestRunner: bnep-tester - PASS
    Total: 1, Passed: 1 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

    ##############################
    Test: CheckTestRunner: mgmt-tester - PASS
    Total: 416, Passed: 402 (96.6%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 14

    ##############################
    Test: CheckTestRunner: rfcomm-tester - PASS
    Total: 9, Passed: 9 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

    ##############################
    Test: CheckTestRunner: sco-tester - PASS
    Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

    ##############################
    Test: CheckTestRunner: smp-tester - PASS
    Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

    ##############################
    Test: CheckTestRunner: userchan-tester - PASS
    Total: 3, Passed: 3 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0

    

---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c b/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c
index 4ef6a54403aa..968ea03d863f 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c
@@ -72,8 +72,8 @@  void bt_sock_reclassify_lock(struct sock *sk, int proto)
 	BUG_ON(!sock_allow_reclassification(sk));
 
 	sock_lock_init_class_and_name(sk,
-			bt_slock_key_strings[proto], &bt_slock_key[proto],
-				bt_key_strings[proto], &bt_lock_key[proto]);
+				      bt_slock_key_strings[proto], &bt_slock_key[proto],
+				      bt_key_strings[proto], &bt_lock_key[proto]);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(bt_sock_reclassify_lock);
 
@@ -451,7 +451,7 @@  static inline __poll_t bt_accept_poll(struct sock *parent)
 }
 
 __poll_t bt_sock_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
-			  poll_table *wait)
+		      poll_table *wait)
 {
 	struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
 	__poll_t mask = 0;
@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@  __poll_t bt_sock_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
 		mask |= EPOLLHUP;
 
 	if (sk->sk_state == BT_CONNECT ||
-			sk->sk_state == BT_CONNECT2 ||
+	    sk->sk_state == BT_CONNECT2 ||
 			sk->sk_state == BT_CONFIG)
 		return mask;
 
@@ -508,7 +508,7 @@  int bt_sock_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
 		amount = sk->sk_sndbuf - sk_wmem_alloc_get(sk);
 		if (amount < 0)
 			amount = 0;
-		err = put_user(amount, (int __user *) arg);
+		err = put_user(amount, (int __user *)arg);
 		break;
 
 	case TIOCINQ:
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@  int bt_sock_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
 		skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
 		amount = skb ? skb->len : 0;
 		release_sock(sk);
-		err = put_user(amount, (int __user *) arg);
+		err = put_user(amount, (int __user *)arg);
 		break;
 
 	default:
@@ -637,7 +637,7 @@  static int bt_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 	struct bt_sock_list *l = PDE_DATA(file_inode(seq->file));
 
 	if (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN) {
-		seq_puts(seq ,"sk               RefCnt Rmem   Wmem   User   Inode  Parent");
+		seq_puts(seq, "sk               RefCnt Rmem   Wmem   User   Inode  Parent");
 
 		if (l->custom_seq_show) {
 			seq_putc(seq, ' ');
@@ -657,7 +657,7 @@  static int bt_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 			   sk_wmem_alloc_get(sk),
 			   from_kuid(seq_user_ns(seq), sock_i_uid(sk)),
 			   sock_i_ino(sk),
-			   bt->parent? sock_i_ino(bt->parent): 0LU);
+			   bt->parent ? sock_i_ino(bt->parent) : 0LU);
 
 		if (l->custom_seq_show) {
 			seq_putc(seq, ' ');
@@ -678,7 +678,7 @@  static const struct seq_operations bt_seq_ops = {
 
 int bt_procfs_init(struct net *net, const char *name,
 		   struct bt_sock_list *sk_list,
-		   int (* seq_show)(struct seq_file *, void *))
+		   int (*seq_show)(struct seq_file *, void *))
 {
 	sk_list->custom_seq_show = seq_show;
 
@@ -694,7 +694,7 @@  void bt_procfs_cleanup(struct net *net, const char *name)
 #else
 int bt_procfs_init(struct net *net, const char *name,
 		   struct bt_sock_list *sk_list,
-		   int (* seq_show)(struct seq_file *, void *))
+		   int (*seq_show)(struct seq_file *, void *))
 {
 	return 0;
 }