Message ID | 20210204183433.1431202-1-axelrasmussen@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | userfaultfd: add minor fault handling | expand |
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:34 AM Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> wrote: > > Changelog > ========= > > v3->v4: > - Reordered if() branches in hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte, so the conditions are > simpler and easier to read. > - Reverted most of the mfill_atomic_pte change (the anon / shmem path). Just > return -EINVAL for CONTINUE, and set zeropage = (mode == > MCOPY_ATOMIC_ZEROPAGE), so we can keep the delta small. > - Split out adding #ifdef CONFIG_USERFAULTFD to a separate patch (instead of > lumping it together with adding UFFDIO_CONTINUE). Also, extended it to make > the same change for shmem as well as suggested by Hugh Dickins. > - Fixed signature of hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte for !CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE > (signature must be the same in either case). > - Rebased onto a newer version of Peter's patches to disable huge PMD sharing. Apologies for the email noise, of course immediately after doing git send-email I realized I forgot to document one item here: - Relaxed restriction for minor registration to allow any hugetlb VMAs, not just those with VM_SHARED. Fixed setting VM_WRITE flag in a CONTINUE ioctl for non-VM_SHARED VMAs. > > v2->v3: > - Added #ifdef CONFIG_USERFAULTFD around hugetlb helper functions, to fix build > errors when building without CONFIG_USERFAULTFD set. > > v1->v2: > - Fixed a bug in the hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte retry case. We now plumb in the > enum mcopy_atomic_mode, so we can differentiate between the three cases this > function needs to handle: > 1) We're doing a COPY op, and need to allocate a page, add to cache, etc. > 2) We're doing a COPY op, but allocation in this function failed previously; > we're in the retry path. The page was allocated, but not e.g. added to page > cache, so that still needs to be done. > 3) We're doing a CONTINUE op, we need to look up an existing page instead of > allocating a new one. > - Rebased onto a newer version of Peter's patches to disable huge PMD sharing, > which fixes syzbot complaints on some non-x86 architectures. > - Moved __VM_UFFD_FLAGS into userfaultfd_k.h, so inline helpers can use it. > - Renamed UFFD_FEATURE_MINOR_FAULT_HUGETLBFS to UFFD_FEATURE_MINOR_HUGETLBFS, > for consistency with other existing feature flags. > - Moved the userfaultfd_minor hook in hugetlb.c into the else block, so we don't > have to explicitly check for !new_page. > > RFC->v1: > - Rebased onto Peter Xu's patches for disabling huge PMD sharing for certain > userfaultfd-registered areas. > - Added commits which update documentation, and add a self test which exercises > the new feature. > - Fixed reporting CONTINUE as a supported ioctl even for non-MINOR ranges. > > Overview > ======== > > This series adds a new userfaultfd registration mode, > UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MINOR. This allows userspace to intercept "minor" faults. > By "minor" fault, I mean the following situation: > > Let there exist two mappings (i.e., VMAs) to the same page(s) (shared memory). > One of the mappings is registered with userfaultfd (in minor mode), and the > other is not. Via the non-UFFD mapping, the underlying pages have already been > allocated & filled with some contents. The UFFD mapping has not yet been > faulted in; when it is touched for the first time, this results in what I'm > calling a "minor" fault. As a concrete example, when working with hugetlbfs, we > have huge_pte_none(), but find_lock_page() finds an existing page. > > We also add a new ioctl to resolve such faults: UFFDIO_CONTINUE. The idea is, > userspace resolves the fault by either a) doing nothing if the contents are > already correct, or b) updating the underlying contents using the second, > non-UFFD mapping (via memcpy/memset or similar, or something fancier like RDMA, > or etc...). In either case, userspace issues UFFDIO_CONTINUE to tell the kernel > "I have ensured the page contents are correct, carry on setting up the mapping". > > Use Case > ======== > > Consider the use case of VM live migration (e.g. under QEMU/KVM): > > 1. While a VM is still running, we copy the contents of its memory to a > target machine. The pages are populated on the target by writing to the > non-UFFD mapping, using the setup described above. The VM is still running > (and therefore its memory is likely changing), so this may be repeated > several times, until we decide the target is "up to date enough". > > 2. We pause the VM on the source, and start executing on the target machine. > During this gap, the VM's user(s) will *see* a pause, so it is desirable to > minimize this window. > > 3. Between the last time any page was copied from the source to the target, and > when the VM was paused, the contents of that page may have changed - and > therefore the copy we have on the target machine is out of date. Although we > can keep track of which pages are out of date, for VMs with large amounts of > memory, it is "slow" to transfer this information to the target machine. We > want to resume execution before such a transfer would complete. > > 4. So, the guest begins executing on the target machine. The first time it > touches its memory (via the UFFD-registered mapping), userspace wants to > intercept this fault. Userspace checks whether or not the page is up to date, > and if not, copies the updated page from the source machine, via the non-UFFD > mapping. Finally, whether a copy was performed or not, userspace issues a > UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl to tell the kernel "I have ensured the page contents > are correct, carry on setting up the mapping". > > We don't have to do all of the final updates on-demand. The userfaultfd manager > can, in the background, also copy over updated pages once it receives the map of > which pages are up-to-date or not. > > Interaction with Existing APIs > ============================== > > Because it's possible to combine registration modes (e.g. a single VMA can be > userfaultfd-registered MINOR | MISSING), and because it's up to userspace how to > resolve faults once they are received, I spent some time thinking through how > the existing API interacts with the new feature. > > UFFDIO_CONTINUE cannot be used to resolve non-minor faults, as it does not > allocate a new page. If UFFDIO_CONTINUE is used on a non-minor fault: > > - For non-shared memory or shmem, -EINVAL is returned. > - For hugetlb, -EFAULT is returned. > > UFFDIO_COPY and UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE cannot be used to resolve minor faults. Without > modifications, the existing codepath assumes a new page needs to be allocated. > This is okay, since userspace must have a second non-UFFD-registered mapping > anyway, thus there isn't much reason to want to use these in any case (just > memcpy or memset or similar). > > - If UFFDIO_COPY is used on a minor fault, -EEXIST is returned. > - If UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE is used on a minor fault, -EEXIST is returned (or -EINVAL > in the case of hugetlb, as UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE is unsupported in any case). > - UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT simply doesn't work with shared memory, and returns > -ENOENT in that case (regardless of the kind of fault). > > Dependencies > ============ > > I've included 4 commits from Peter Xu's larger series > (https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/1366017/) in this series. My changes > depend on his work, to disable huge PMD sharing for MINOR registered userfaultfd > areas. I included the 4 commits directly because a) it lets this series just be > applied and work as-is, and b) they are fairly standalone, and could potentially > be merged even without the rest of the larger series Peter submitted. Thanks > Peter! > > Also, although it doesn't affect minor fault handling, I did notice that the > userfaultfd self test sometimes experienced memory corruption > (https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/1356755/). For anyone testing this > series, it may be useful to apply that series first to fix the selftest > flakiness. That series doesn't have to be merged into mainline / maintaner > branches before mine, though. > > Future Work > =========== > > Currently the patchset only supports hugetlbfs. There is no reason it can't work > with shmem, but I expect hugetlbfs to be much more commonly used since we're > talking about backing guest memory for VMs. I plan to implement shmem support in > a follow-up patch series. > > Axel Rasmussen (6): > userfaultfd: add minor fault registration mode > userfaultfd: disable huge PMD sharing for MINOR registered VMAs > userfaultfd: hugetlbfs: only compile UFFD helpers if config enabled > userfaultfd: add UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl > userfaultfd: update documentation to describe minor fault handling > userfaultfd/selftests: add test exercising minor fault handling > > Peter Xu (4): > hugetlb: Pass vma into huge_pte_alloc() and huge_pmd_share() > hugetlb/userfaultfd: Forbid huge pmd sharing when uffd enabled > mm/hugetlb: Move flush_hugetlb_tlb_range() into hugetlb.h > hugetlb/userfaultfd: Unshare all pmds for hugetlbfs when register wp > > Documentation/admin-guide/mm/userfaultfd.rst | 107 ++++++---- > arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 7 +- > arch/ia64/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 3 +- > arch/mips/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 4 +- > arch/parisc/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 2 +- > arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 3 +- > arch/s390/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 2 +- > arch/sh/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 2 +- > arch/sparc/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 6 +- > fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 1 + > fs/userfaultfd.c | 196 ++++++++++++++++--- > include/linux/hugetlb.h | 22 ++- > include/linux/mm.h | 1 + > include/linux/mmu_notifier.h | 1 + > include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h | 49 ++++- > include/trace/events/mmflags.h | 1 + > include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h | 36 +++- > mm/hugetlb.c | 113 +++++++---- > mm/userfaultfd.c | 51 +++-- > tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c | 147 +++++++++++++- > 20 files changed, 601 insertions(+), 153 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.30.0.365.g02bc693789-goog >
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 10:34:23AM -0800, Axel Rasmussen wrote: > - Split out adding #ifdef CONFIG_USERFAULTFD to a separate patch (instead of > lumping it together with adding UFFDIO_CONTINUE). Also, extended it to make > the same change for shmem as well as suggested by Hugh Dickins. It seems you didn't extend it to shmem yet. :) But I think it's fine - it can always be done as a separate patch then when you work on shmem, or even post it along. Thanks,
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 4:03 PM Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 10:34:23AM -0800, Axel Rasmussen wrote: > > - Split out adding #ifdef CONFIG_USERFAULTFD to a separate patch (instead of > > lumping it together with adding UFFDIO_CONTINUE). Also, extended it to make > > the same change for shmem as well as suggested by Hugh Dickins. > > It seems you didn't extend it to shmem yet. :) But I think it's fine - it can > always be done as a separate patch then when you work on shmem, or even post it > along. Thanks, Ah, indeed, sorry about this. I had originally planned to only do hugetlb, but then added shmem based on Hugh's comments. And then, later reverted the shmem parts as per the original plan, after some additional discussion with Hugh. I wrote the changelog entry somewhere in the middle of that, and forgot to update it. :) > > -- > Peter Xu >