| Message ID | 20210209062131.2300005-2-tientzu@chromium.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Restricted DMA | expand |
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 02:21:18PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote: > This can be dropped if Christoph's swiotlb cleanups are landed. > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20210207160934.2955931-1-hch@lst.de/T/#m7124f29b6076d462101fcff6433295157621da09 FYI, I've also started looking into additional cleanups based on your struct in this branch, but I'd like to wait for all the previous changes to settle first: http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git/shortlog/refs/heads/swiotlb-struct
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/svm.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/svm.c index 7b739cc7a8a9..c10c51d49f3d 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/svm.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/svm.c @@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ void __init svm_swiotlb_init(void) if (vstart && !swiotlb_init_with_tbl(vstart, io_tlb_nslabs, false)) return; - if (io_tlb_start) - memblock_free_early(io_tlb_start, + if (vstart) + memblock_free_early(vstart, PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT)); panic("SVM: Cannot allocate SWIOTLB buffer"); } diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c index 2b385c1b4a99..91f8c68d1a9b 100644 --- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c +++ b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c @@ -192,8 +192,8 @@ int __ref xen_swiotlb_init(int verbose, bool early) /* * IO TLB memory already allocated. Just use it. */ - if (io_tlb_start != 0) { - xen_io_tlb_start = phys_to_virt(io_tlb_start); + if (is_swiotlb_active()) { + xen_io_tlb_start = phys_to_virt(get_swiotlb_start()); goto end; } diff --git a/include/linux/swiotlb.h b/include/linux/swiotlb.h index d9c9fc9ca5d2..83200f3b042a 100644 --- a/include/linux/swiotlb.h +++ b/include/linux/swiotlb.h @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ void __init swiotlb_exit(void); unsigned int swiotlb_max_segment(void); size_t swiotlb_max_mapping_size(struct device *dev); bool is_swiotlb_active(void); +phys_addr_t get_swiotlb_start(void); void __init swiotlb_adjust_size(unsigned long new_size); #else #define swiotlb_force SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c index 7c42df6e6100..e180211f6ad9 100644 --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c @@ -719,6 +719,11 @@ bool is_swiotlb_active(void) return io_tlb_end != 0; } +phys_addr_t get_swiotlb_start(void) +{ + return io_tlb_start; +} + #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS static int __init swiotlb_create_debugfs(void)
Add a new function, get_swiotlb_start(), and remove external access to io_tlb_start, so we can entirely hide struct swiotlb inside of swiotlb.c in the following patches. Signed-off-by: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org> --- arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/svm.c | 4 ++-- drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 4 ++-- include/linux/swiotlb.h | 1 + kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 5 +++++ 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) -- This can be dropped if Christoph's swiotlb cleanups are landed. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20210207160934.2955931-1-hch@lst.de/T/#m7124f29b6076d462101fcff6433295157621da09 2.30.0.478.g8a0d178c01-goog