Message ID | 20210211153353.29094-4-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | arm64: ARMv8.5-A: MTE: Add async mode support | expand |
Hi Vincenzo,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on next-20210211]
[cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core xlnx/master arm/for-next soc/for-next kvmarm/next linus/master hnaz-linux-mm/master v5.11-rc7 v5.11-rc6 v5.11-rc5 v5.11-rc7]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Vincenzo-Frascino/arm64-ARMv8-5-A-MTE-Add-async-mode-support/20210212-004947
base: 671176b0016c80b3943cb5387312c886aba3308d
config: riscv-randconfig-s031-20210209 (attached as .config)
compiler: riscv64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce:
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# apt-get install sparse
# sparse version: v0.6.3-215-g0fb77bb6-dirty
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/df25c9583cd523a49f2407e0aeee55bdec24a14e
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Vincenzo-Frascino/arm64-ARMv8-5-A-MTE-Add-async-mode-support/20210212-004947
git checkout df25c9583cd523a49f2407e0aeee55bdec24a14e
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' ARCH=riscv
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
riscv64-linux-ld: mm/kasan/report.o: in function `.L0 ':
report.c:(.text+0x480): undefined reference to `kasan_flag_async'
>> riscv64-linux-ld: report.c:(.text+0x5c4): undefined reference to `kasan_flag_async'
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 9:04 PM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote: > > Hi Vincenzo, > > I love your patch! Yet something to improve: > > [auto build test ERROR on next-20210211] > [cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core xlnx/master arm/for-next soc/for-next kvmarm/next linus/master hnaz-linux-mm/master v5.11-rc7 v5.11-rc6 v5.11-rc5 v5.11-rc7] > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Vincenzo-Frascino/arm64-ARMv8-5-A-MTE-Add-async-mode-support/20210212-004947 > base: 671176b0016c80b3943cb5387312c886aba3308d > config: riscv-randconfig-s031-20210209 (attached as .config) > compiler: riscv64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0 > reproduce: > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > # apt-get install sparse > # sparse version: v0.6.3-215-g0fb77bb6-dirty > # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/df25c9583cd523a49f2407e0aeee55bdec24a14e > git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux > git fetch --no-tags linux-review Vincenzo-Frascino/arm64-ARMv8-5-A-MTE-Add-async-mode-support/20210212-004947 > git checkout df25c9583cd523a49f2407e0aeee55bdec24a14e > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' ARCH=riscv > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > riscv64-linux-ld: mm/kasan/report.o: in function `.L0 ': > report.c:(.text+0x480): undefined reference to `kasan_flag_async' > >> riscv64-linux-ld: report.c:(.text+0x5c4): undefined reference to `kasan_flag_async' Let's do something like this (untested): https://github.com/xairy/linux/commit/91354d34b30ceedbc1b6417f1ff253de90618a97
Hi Andrey, On 2/11/21 8:13 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: >>>> riscv64-linux-ld: report.c:(.text+0x5c4): undefined reference to `kasan_flag_async' > Let's do something like this (untested): > > https://github.com/xairy/linux/commit/91354d34b30ceedbc1b6417f1ff253de90618a97 Could you reproduce this? I tried yesterday before posting the patches and my conclusion was that kbuild robot is testing on the wrong tree. I give it another go today, if you have more details based on your testing feel free to share.
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:21 PM Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> wrote: > > Hi Andrey, > > On 2/11/21 8:13 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > >>>> riscv64-linux-ld: report.c:(.text+0x5c4): undefined reference to `kasan_flag_async' > > Let's do something like this (untested): > > > > https://github.com/xairy/linux/commit/91354d34b30ceedbc1b6417f1ff253de90618a97 > > Could you reproduce this? I tried yesterday before posting the patches and my > conclusion was that kbuild robot is testing on the wrong tree. > > I give it another go today, if you have more details based on your testing feel > free to share. I haven't tried reproducing, but the error makes sense. There's no definition of kasan_flag_async for KASAN modes other than HW_TAGS.
diff --git a/include/linux/kasan.h b/include/linux/kasan.h index 14f72ec96492..d53ea3c047bc 100644 --- a/include/linux/kasan.h +++ b/include/linux/kasan.h @@ -376,6 +376,12 @@ static inline void *kasan_reset_tag(const void *addr) #endif /* CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS || CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS*/ +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS + +void kasan_report_async(void); + +#endif /* CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS */ + #ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS void __init kasan_init_sw_tags(void); #else diff --git a/mm/kasan/report.c b/mm/kasan/report.c index 87b271206163..f147633f1f2b 100644 --- a/mm/kasan/report.c +++ b/mm/kasan/report.c @@ -87,7 +87,8 @@ static void start_report(unsigned long *flags) static void end_report(unsigned long *flags, unsigned long addr) { - trace_error_report_end(ERROR_DETECTOR_KASAN, addr); + if (!kasan_flag_async) + trace_error_report_end(ERROR_DETECTOR_KASAN, addr); pr_err("==================================================================\n"); add_taint(TAINT_BAD_PAGE, LOCKDEP_NOW_UNRELIABLE); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&report_lock, *flags); @@ -360,6 +361,20 @@ void kasan_report_invalid_free(void *object, unsigned long ip) end_report(&flags, (unsigned long)object); } +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS +void kasan_report_async(void) +{ + unsigned long flags; + + start_report(&flags); + pr_err("BUG: KASAN: invalid-access\n"); + pr_err("Asynchronous mode enabled: no access details available\n"); + pr_err("\n"); + dump_stack(); + end_report(&flags, 0); +} +#endif /* CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS */ + static void __kasan_report(unsigned long addr, size_t size, bool is_write, unsigned long ip) {