| Message ID | 1614070452-91054-1-git-send-email-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | drm/ttm/ttm_bo: make ttm_bo_glob_use_count static | expand |
Am 23.02.21 um 09:54 schrieb Jiapeng Chong: > Fix the following sparse warning: > > drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:53:10: warning: symbol > 'ttm_bo_glob_use_count' was not declared. Should it be static? IIRC we already have a patch for this on the mailing list and the mutex can be static as well. Christian. > > Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> > Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c > index b65f4b1..107dd13 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c > @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ > * ttm_global_mutex - protecting the global BO state > */ > DEFINE_MUTEX(ttm_global_mutex); > -unsigned ttm_bo_glob_use_count; > +static unsigned ttm_bo_glob_use_count; > struct ttm_bo_global ttm_bo_glob; > EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_glob); >
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c index b65f4b1..107dd13 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ * ttm_global_mutex - protecting the global BO state */ DEFINE_MUTEX(ttm_global_mutex); -unsigned ttm_bo_glob_use_count; +static unsigned ttm_bo_glob_use_count; struct ttm_bo_global ttm_bo_glob; EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_glob);
Fix the following sparse warning: drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:53:10: warning: symbol 'ttm_bo_glob_use_count' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)