diff mbox series

net: mac802154: Fix null pointer dereference

Message ID 20210303162757.763502-1-paskripkin@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Awaiting Upstream
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series net: mac802154: Fix null pointer dereference | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/cover_letter success Link
netdev/fixes_present success Link
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be net-next
netdev/subject_prefix warning Target tree name not specified in the subject
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 1 maintainers not CCed: kuba@kernel.org
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Link
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_fixes success Link
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 8 lines checked
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/header_inline success Link
netdev/stable success Stable not CCed

Commit Message

Pavel Skripkin March 3, 2021, 4:27 p.m. UTC
syzbot found general protection fault in crypto_destroy_tfm()[1].
It was caused by wrong clean up loop in llsec_key_alloc().
If one of the tfm array members won't be initialized it will cause
NULL dereference in crypto_destroy_tfm().

Call Trace:
 crypto_free_aead include/crypto/aead.h:191 [inline] [1]
 llsec_key_alloc net/mac802154/llsec.c:156 [inline]
 mac802154_llsec_key_add+0x9e0/0xcc0 net/mac802154/llsec.c:249
 ieee802154_add_llsec_key+0x56/0x80 net/mac802154/cfg.c:338
 rdev_add_llsec_key net/ieee802154/rdev-ops.h:260 [inline]
 nl802154_add_llsec_key+0x3d3/0x560 net/ieee802154/nl802154.c:1584
 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x228/0x320 net/netlink/genetlink.c:739
 genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:783 [inline]
 genl_rcv_msg+0x328/0x580 net/netlink/genetlink.c:800
 netlink_rcv_skb+0x153/0x420 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2502
 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:811
 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1312 [inline]
 netlink_unicast+0x533/0x7d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1338
 netlink_sendmsg+0x856/0xd90 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1927
 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:654 [inline]
 sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x120 net/socket.c:674
 ____sys_sendmsg+0x6e8/0x810 net/socket.c:2350
 ___sys_sendmsg+0xf3/0x170 net/socket.c:2404
 __sys_sendmsg+0xe5/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2433
 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+12cf5fbfdeba210a89dd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
---
 net/mac802154/llsec.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Alexander Aring March 4, 2021, 2:40 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 11:28, Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> syzbot found general protection fault in crypto_destroy_tfm()[1].
> It was caused by wrong clean up loop in llsec_key_alloc().
> If one of the tfm array members won't be initialized it will cause
> NULL dereference in crypto_destroy_tfm().
>
> Call Trace:
>  crypto_free_aead include/crypto/aead.h:191 [inline] [1]
>  llsec_key_alloc net/mac802154/llsec.c:156 [inline]
>  mac802154_llsec_key_add+0x9e0/0xcc0 net/mac802154/llsec.c:249
>  ieee802154_add_llsec_key+0x56/0x80 net/mac802154/cfg.c:338
>  rdev_add_llsec_key net/ieee802154/rdev-ops.h:260 [inline]
>  nl802154_add_llsec_key+0x3d3/0x560 net/ieee802154/nl802154.c:1584
>  genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x228/0x320 net/netlink/genetlink.c:739
>  genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:783 [inline]
>  genl_rcv_msg+0x328/0x580 net/netlink/genetlink.c:800
>  netlink_rcv_skb+0x153/0x420 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2502
>  genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:811
>  netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1312 [inline]
>  netlink_unicast+0x533/0x7d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1338
>  netlink_sendmsg+0x856/0xd90 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1927
>  sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:654 [inline]
>  sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x120 net/socket.c:674
>  ____sys_sendmsg+0x6e8/0x810 net/socket.c:2350
>  ___sys_sendmsg+0xf3/0x170 net/socket.c:2404
>  __sys_sendmsg+0xe5/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2433
>  do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: syzbot+12cf5fbfdeba210a89dd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> ---
>  net/mac802154/llsec.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mac802154/llsec.c b/net/mac802154/llsec.c
> index 585d33144c33..6709f186f777 100644
> --- a/net/mac802154/llsec.c
> +++ b/net/mac802154/llsec.c
> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ llsec_key_alloc(const struct ieee802154_llsec_key *template)
>  err_tfm0:
>         crypto_free_sync_skcipher(key->tfm0);
>  err_tfm:
> -       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(key->tfm); i++)
> +       for (; i >= 0; i--)
>                 if (key->tfm[i])

I think this need to be:

if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(key->tfm[i]))

otherwise we still run into issues for the current iterator when
key->tfm[i] is in range of IS_ERR().

- Alex
Pavel Skripkin March 4, 2021, 9:23 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi, thanks for your reply!

On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 21:40 -0500, Alexander Aring wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 11:28, Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > syzbot found general protection fault in crypto_destroy_tfm()[1].
> > It was caused by wrong clean up loop in llsec_key_alloc().
> > If one of the tfm array members won't be initialized it will cause
> > NULL dereference in crypto_destroy_tfm().
> > 
> > Call Trace:
> >  crypto_free_aead include/crypto/aead.h:191 [inline] [1]
> >  llsec_key_alloc net/mac802154/llsec.c:156 [inline]
> >  mac802154_llsec_key_add+0x9e0/0xcc0 net/mac802154/llsec.c:249
> >  ieee802154_add_llsec_key+0x56/0x80 net/mac802154/cfg.c:338
> >  rdev_add_llsec_key net/ieee802154/rdev-ops.h:260 [inline]
> >  nl802154_add_llsec_key+0x3d3/0x560 net/ieee802154/nl802154.c:1584
> >  genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x228/0x320 net/netlink/genetlink.c:739
> >  genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:783 [inline]
> >  genl_rcv_msg+0x328/0x580 net/netlink/genetlink.c:800
> >  netlink_rcv_skb+0x153/0x420 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2502
> >  genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:811
> >  netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1312 [inline]
> >  netlink_unicast+0x533/0x7d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1338
> >  netlink_sendmsg+0x856/0xd90 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1927
> >  sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:654 [inline]
> >  sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x120 net/socket.c:674
> >  ____sys_sendmsg+0x6e8/0x810 net/socket.c:2350
> >  ___sys_sendmsg+0xf3/0x170 net/socket.c:2404
> >  __sys_sendmsg+0xe5/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2433
> >  do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
> >  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com>
> > Reported-by: syzbot+12cf5fbfdeba210a89dd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > ---
> >  net/mac802154/llsec.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/mac802154/llsec.c b/net/mac802154/llsec.c
> > index 585d33144c33..6709f186f777 100644
> > --- a/net/mac802154/llsec.c
> > +++ b/net/mac802154/llsec.c
> > @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ llsec_key_alloc(const struct
> > ieee802154_llsec_key *template)
> >  err_tfm0:
> >         crypto_free_sync_skcipher(key->tfm0);
> >  err_tfm:
> > -       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(key->tfm); i++)
> > +       for (; i >= 0; i--)
> >                 if (key->tfm[i])
> 
> I think this need to be:
> 
> if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(key->tfm[i]))
> 
> otherwise we still run into issues for the current iterator when
> key->tfm[i] is in range of IS_ERR().

Oh... I got it completly wrong, I'm sorry. If it's still not fixed,
I'll send rigth patch for that.

> 
> - Alex
Alexander Aring March 4, 2021, 2:22 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi,

On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 04:23, Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com> wrote:
...
> >
> > I think this need to be:
> >
> > if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(key->tfm[i]))
> >
> > otherwise we still run into issues for the current iterator when
> > key->tfm[i] is in range of IS_ERR().
>
> Oh... I got it completly wrong, I'm sorry. If it's still not fixed,
> I'll send rigth patch for that.
>

please resend your patch. We will review again.

- Alex
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/mac802154/llsec.c b/net/mac802154/llsec.c
index 585d33144c33..6709f186f777 100644
--- a/net/mac802154/llsec.c
+++ b/net/mac802154/llsec.c
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@  llsec_key_alloc(const struct ieee802154_llsec_key *template)
 err_tfm0:
 	crypto_free_sync_skcipher(key->tfm0);
 err_tfm:
-	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(key->tfm); i++)
+	for (; i >= 0; i--)
 		if (key->tfm[i])
 			crypto_free_aead(key->tfm[i]);